한국과 일본의 조세법률주의 비교연구 = A Comparative Study of "Taxation by Statutory Law" in Korea and Japan

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

`Taxation by statutory law` principle both in Korea and Japan is a sort of an offspring of the more general principle of `administration by statutory law`, which requires statutory law for the government to restrict on people`s liberty and property and also gives priority to the statutory law over the determination either by the administration or by the judiciary when both are in conflict. Both principles that a taxable event should be prescribed by statutory law and that such taxable event should be prescribed in definite and clear terms come from the common principle of `taxation by statutory law`. Historically viewed all those principles originated from the German `Grundsatz der Gesetzmaßigkeit des Besteuerung`, which means `principle of legal taxation` and is somehow different from `taxation by statutory law` in its nuance. The reason why the term `taxation by statutory law` rather than `principle of legal taxation` is used both countries may be found in their individual constitutions both of which have almost the same provision that `a tax and its tax rate should be stipulated by a statutory law`. Notwithstanding such historically common grounds found in the 3 countries, the term `taxation by statutory law` in both countries affect the administration and especially the judiciary to apply tax laws in a more conservative manner than in Germany that the legal forms and structures taxpayers construct are generally respected with only a few exceptions for the purpose of taxation. Such attitudes, although they have their own merits, have to be compromised in harmony with the `equality principle`, which nowadays requires a `substantial equality` and therefore gives apparently more room for the administration or the judiciary to disregard or reconstruct the legal relations taxpayers have built for the purpose of applying tax laws.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이태로, "조세법강의" 박영사 2009

2 임승순, "조세법" 박영사 2009

3 이동식, "재산제세사무처리규정(국세청훈령)의 법규성. in: 조세판례백선"

4 최명근, "세법학총론" 세경사 2005

5 이창희, "세법강의" 박영사 2008

6 김성수, "세법" 법문사 2003

7 오윤, "세무조사제도개혁방안"

8 김완석, "부진정소급과세의 위헌성. in: 조세판례백선" 박영사 2005

9 北野弘久, "稅法問題事例硏究" 勁草書房 2005

10 金子宏, "租稅法 (제10판)" 弘文堂 2005

11 中村芳昭, "租稅法" 法學書院 2008

12 Tipke, "Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt"

13 Rolf Ax, "Thomas Groshe & Juergen Melchior, Abgabenordnung und Finanzgerichts－ordnung"

14 Frnas Vanistendael, "Legal Framework for Taxation, Tax law Design and Drafting"

15 Wolfgang Blumers, "Germany, Advance rulings, Cahiers"

16 Hugh J. Ault, "Comparative Income Taxation"

17 Carlo Romano, "Advance Tax Rulings and Principles - Towards a European Tax Rulings System?"

18 Ax, "Abgabenordnung und Finanzgerichtsordnung"