In modern Korean Grammar, the most grammarians insist that the ending ko is the adverbial one. But I declare, in thin paper, that ko is the connective ending.
So, If I state the semantic structure of ko, it is as following.
1.to has the structure of...
In modern Korean Grammar, the most grammarians insist that the ending ko is the adverbial one. But I declare, in thin paper, that ko is the connective ending.
So, If I state the semantic structure of ko, it is as following.
1.to has the structure of two kinds, one is static and the other is dynamic.
2.The static one has the meaning of state, Continuance and desire.
3.The dynamic one has the meaning of progress, perfect, reduplication.
4.The okyntactic structures of progress and desire are different from those of state, continuance, perfect and reduplication.
6.The tree diagrams of progress and desire are as following.
◁그림삽입▷ (원문을 참조하세요)