RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      소규모 그래픽 디자인 스튜디오의 역할과 생존 모델의 성립: 2010~2015년을 중심으로

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109237787

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background : From the late 1990s to the early 2000s, the industrial structure of South Korean society, including design, began to be reorganized due to economic crises such as the foreign exchange crisis. In particular, the subjects performing graphic...

      Background : From the late 1990s to the early 2000s, the industrial structure of South Korean society, including design, began to be reorganized due to economic crises such as the foreign exchange crisis. In particular, the subjects performing graphic design were continuously being miniaturized. Small studios that appeared in the mid-2000s began to stand out in the field of culture and arts and achieved cultural achievements. However, in the 2010s, doubts began to arise about the sustainability of small studios. This study aims to reveal that in the 2010s, the members and culture of small studios matured and began to specify and systematize their roles and survival models.
      Methods : This study first analyzed the limitations and sustainability issues of small-scale studios raised in the exhibition Graphic Design, 2005-2015, Seoul from various angles. Afterwards, we analyzed articles, interviews, and writings published in magazines, academic journals, daily newspapers, and books in the design field to track the activities of small studios from the early to mid-2010s. We took a closer look at the strategy and the process of building a survival model through it.
      Results : In the 2010s, small studios were not limited to just a few cases, and new production entities continued to emerge. First, from the beginning, members of the small studio did not stop at performing design services but showed autonomous and experimental work, demonstrating capabilities on par with artists in the field of culture and arts. As a result, they were able to acquire the status of equal collaborators from the planning stage on projects in the field of culture and arts. Based on this, starting in the 2010s, small studios were able to win projects from cultural and artistic institutions in various fields in South Korea. Second, the small studio discovered new cultural production and consumption groups by faithfully understanding and analyzing the economic, social, and cultural background of the time and presented a new role model in the publishing field. By making literary books recognized as preferred consumption products, the small studio succeeded in commercializing content for the taste community, and later spread into a movement of small studios adopting similar methodologies. Third, they proposed a communication method that shortened the complex decision-making process in corporate communication and maximized the creativity of small studios. This could be of great significance in overcoming the limitations of small studios that find it difficult to pursue profits.
      Conclusions : Small studios that emerged in the 2000s were attracting attention by producing autonomous and experimental work. Entering the 2010s, small studios have established new roles and survival models by systematizing methodologies and strategies and carrying out various projects in the fields of culture and arts, publishing, and corporate communication. This has allowed small studios to become more common and a common role and survival model since the late 2010s.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼