RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      내국민대우원칙에 따른 중국 외자기업법제 개편논의와 전망

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103042049

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The WTO system made all membership countries to follow the international trade regulations system, and the fundamental measures of China on joining WTO is to complete its market economy law system to match the needs of market economy and WTO demands. ...

      The WTO system made all membership countries to follow the international trade regulations system, and the fundamental measures of China on joining WTO is to complete its market economy law system to match the needs of market economy and WTO demands.
      China's foreign investment law still includes articles that are contrary to national treatment and basic principles of WTO despite the revision in year 2000 and 2001. Also, there were no change or actual improvements done on the collision and contradiction between laws, and those with their superior ordinances as well as disharmony between foreigners investment enterprise and company laws, and other civil, mercantile laws. This situation is negatively and passively influencing China's politic issues called as creation of a healthy, clear foreign investment inducing environment.
      However, in August 2006, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress commenced the discussion on the amendment of the Income Taxes Act that unifies the enterprise income taxes of domestic and foreign enterprises and this law is expected to take effect as of 2008. Such movement for unifying the income taxes of foreign and domestic capital corporations is directly related, in terms of depth and timing, to the long-debated topic of the amendment of China's foreign investment law system.
      The concern with the China's foreign investment law is the fact that, rather than treating foreign investors with disadvantage and prejudice, the domestic enterprises are being held in unfavorable positions because the foreign investments are being granted with too much privilege. Therefore the process of the national treatment became essential in revolutionizing the China's foreign investment law system.
      China, which has become the country in possession of the most foreign exchange, changed their attitude from what they used to passively and reluctantly seek for the need of amending the National Treatment as a mandatory WTO measure to what they now try to actively rationalize the need for an amendment that complies with the National Treatment while the academia is pursuing a balanced combination of the China's Transcendental National Treatment and the WTO's National Treatment.
      Even if the Income Taxes Act that unifies the income taxes of foreign-domestic enterprises is introduced, considering the positive roles that foreign enterprises are responsible for and the priority that the WTO grants to developing countries in terms of their investment, a Unified Corporation Act that will effectively demonstrate the national treatment in a short period of time seems difficult.
      Considering the fact that the WTO National Treatment is in gradual progress and that China is familiar with procedural unified law translation by disperse lawmaking, the Code of Foreign Investment Unification theory seems like a more reasonable and feasible amendment method than the mono-track system amendment theory or the standard corporation act amendment theory.
      Taking into account WTO international trade regulations, world trends of economy globalization, and the Chinese macro-economy, China, hereafter, is expected to concentrate all efforts in improving the environment of hosting foreign capitals by heading towards the ‘national treatment for global convenience’ rather than the ‘ultimate treatment for the Chinese tradition.’ Meanwhile, the country is viewed to change from 'code system' to 'mono-track system' after changing its China's foreign investment law system from 'dual-track system' to 'code system'.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 吳津, "論入世與我國外資立法的完善" (4) : 2004

      2 肖, "論入世與我國外資立法的完善" (2) : 2004

      3 문준조, "중국의 WTO가입과 법제정비에 관한 연구" 한국법제연구원 2001

      4 윤상직, "외국인직접투자제도해설" 2005

      5 조영정, "국제통상법의 이해" 무역경영사 1999

      6 최승환, "국제경제법 제3판" 법영사 2006

      7 鄭偉, "關于完善中國外商投資法的幾点建議" (6) : 2004

      8 余塋, "經濟全球化背景下我國外資法的調整與走向" (9) : 2004

      9 余塋, "經濟全球化背景下我國外資法的調整與走向" (9) : 2004

      10 余先予, "涉外經濟法總論" 法律出版社 2004

      1 吳津, "論入世與我國外資立法的完善" (4) : 2004

      2 肖, "論入世與我國外資立法的完善" (2) : 2004

      3 문준조, "중국의 WTO가입과 법제정비에 관한 연구" 한국법제연구원 2001

      4 윤상직, "외국인직접투자제도해설" 2005

      5 조영정, "국제통상법의 이해" 무역경영사 1999

      6 최승환, "국제경제법 제3판" 법영사 2006

      7 鄭偉, "關于完善中國外商投資法的幾点建議" (6) : 2004

      8 余塋, "經濟全球化背景下我國外資法的調整與走向" (9) : 2004

      9 余塋, "經濟全球化背景下我國外資法的調整與走向" (9) : 2004

      10 余先予, "涉外經濟法總論" 法律出版社 2004

      11 解薇, "我國外資立法體系的現狀與重構" (11) : 2004

      12 馬忠法李路根, "我國外商投資企業法存在的問題及其對策" 2004

      13 陳安, "國際經濟法專論 下" 高等敎育出版社 2002

      14 魏國君, "國際經濟法學" 北京大學出版社 2003

      15 曾明强翁杰, "入世後中國外資立法若干問題探析" (6) : 2004

      16 顧敏康, "以公司法爲本, 中國外資法體系" (4) : 2000

      17 鐘立國, "中國 WTO法律制度的適用" 吉林人民出版社 2002

      18 주중국 한국대사관, "htttp://www.koreaemb.org.cn"

      19 WT0, "http://www.wto.org/"

      20 WT0, "http://www.wto.org/"

      21 中國 國家外換管理局, "http://www.safe.gov.cn/"

      22 中國 商務部, "http://www.mofcom.gov.cn/"

      23 中國 最高人民法院, "http://www.court.gov.cn/"

      24 中國 法律法規信息系統, "http://law.npc.gov.cn:87/home"

      25 安麗, "WTO規則與中國外資法重構" 89 (89): 2002

      26 劉筍, "WTO法律規則體系對國際投資法的影向" 中國法制出版社 2001

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (계속평가)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2019-12-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
      2018-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2017-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2016-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-06-08 학술지등록 한글명 : 통상법률
      외국어명 : International Trade Law
      KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.41 0.41 0.25
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.26 0.26 0.508 0.17
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼