RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      고려시대의 사송(詞訟) 인식과 운영 = A Study on Perception and Operation of Civil Procedure in Goryeo Dynasty

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107150344

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This thesis examined the perception of Sasong (Civil Procedure) and its operation in Goryeo dynasty. It seems that Sasong wasn't severe during the early Goryeo dynasty. But it increased significantly and piled up according to social changes since the 12th century. There was not choice to use a lot of historical records of the latter period due to the lack of records related to Sasong in the earlier period. So it should be distinguished between what was common in the whole period of Goryeo and the new phenomenon appeared in the latter period.
      It considered that political ideal is to realize a society without Sasong according to Confucian ideology. However, in reality, it acknowledged the inevitability of Sasong and operated the Sasong system to resolve Woneok (resentment). In Confucianism, Woneok was recognized as a cause of natural disasters. The state legally protected Sasong rights and emphasized that the judge should make fair and speedy trial. It operated the Sangpi system (the system to prevent conflicts of interest) for fairness while the plaintiff and the defendant were given equal chance to plead before the court, and judged according to the rule of evidence. And it set the deadline legally to prevent the delay in judgment. If disagreeing with the results of the trial, it could be taking retrials or appeals. But as Sasong increased sharply, it began to limit the repetition of Sasong at the last period.
      It valued justification and moral feelings as the standard of judicial hearing and decision. However, if considering moral feelings, it may be criticized as making by personal feelings and may not be able to strictly apply the law. So it generally tended to value the objective documentary evidences and to judge in accordance with laws and regulations.
      번역하기

      This thesis examined the perception of Sasong (Civil Procedure) and its operation in Goryeo dynasty. It seems that Sasong wasn't severe during the early Goryeo dynasty. But it increased significantly and piled up according to social changes since the ...

      This thesis examined the perception of Sasong (Civil Procedure) and its operation in Goryeo dynasty. It seems that Sasong wasn't severe during the early Goryeo dynasty. But it increased significantly and piled up according to social changes since the 12th century. There was not choice to use a lot of historical records of the latter period due to the lack of records related to Sasong in the earlier period. So it should be distinguished between what was common in the whole period of Goryeo and the new phenomenon appeared in the latter period.
      It considered that political ideal is to realize a society without Sasong according to Confucian ideology. However, in reality, it acknowledged the inevitability of Sasong and operated the Sasong system to resolve Woneok (resentment). In Confucianism, Woneok was recognized as a cause of natural disasters. The state legally protected Sasong rights and emphasized that the judge should make fair and speedy trial. It operated the Sangpi system (the system to prevent conflicts of interest) for fairness while the plaintiff and the defendant were given equal chance to plead before the court, and judged according to the rule of evidence. And it set the deadline legally to prevent the delay in judgment. If disagreeing with the results of the trial, it could be taking retrials or appeals. But as Sasong increased sharply, it began to limit the repetition of Sasong at the last period.
      It valued justification and moral feelings as the standard of judicial hearing and decision. However, if considering moral feelings, it may be criticized as making by personal feelings and may not be able to strictly apply the law. So it generally tended to value the objective documentary evidences and to judge in accordance with laws and regulations.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 임상혁, "조선전기 민사소송과 소송이론의 전개" 서울대학교 대학원 2000

      2 채웅석, "고려후기 사송(詞訟)의 범람과 국가의 대책" 한국사연구회 (187) : 143-185, 2019

      3 任相爀, "高麗의 裁判에 관한 考察" 서울大學校 大學院 1993

      4 金容燮, "高麗時期의 量田制" 韓國中世農業史硏究" 2000

      5 李景植, "高麗時期土地制度硏究" 지식산업사 2012

      6 盧明鎬, "高麗時代의 土地相續" 6 : 1989

      7 朴京安, "高麗後期 土地制度硏究" 혜안 1996

      8 金龍善, "高麗墓誌銘集成" 한림대출판부 2012

      9 李仁在, "高麗 中·後期 收租地奪占의 類型과 性格" 93 : 1996

      10 박병호, "韓國法制史" 한국방송통신대출판부 1990

      1 임상혁, "조선전기 민사소송과 소송이론의 전개" 서울대학교 대학원 2000

      2 채웅석, "고려후기 사송(詞訟)의 범람과 국가의 대책" 한국사연구회 (187) : 143-185, 2019

      3 任相爀, "高麗의 裁判에 관한 考察" 서울大學校 大學院 1993

      4 金容燮, "高麗時期의 量田制" 韓國中世農業史硏究" 2000

      5 李景植, "高麗時期土地制度硏究" 지식산업사 2012

      6 盧明鎬, "高麗時代의 土地相續" 6 : 1989

      7 朴京安, "高麗後期 土地制度硏究" 혜안 1996

      8 金龍善, "高麗墓誌銘集成" 한림대출판부 2012

      9 李仁在, "高麗 中·後期 收租地奪占의 類型과 性格" 93 : 1996

      10 박병호, "韓國法制史" 한국방송통신대출판부 1990

      11 朴晉勳, "韓國史의 構造와 展開" 혜안 2000

      12 崔承4熙, "韓國古文書硏究" 韓國精神文化硏究院 1983

      13 노명호, "韓國古代中世古文書硏究(上)" 서울대출판부 2000

      14 仁井田陞, "唐令拾遺" 東京大學出版會 1964

      15 鄭光, "吏學指南" 태학사 2002

      16 范忠信, "中國法律文化探究" 一潮閣 1996

      17 채웅석, "『고려사』형법지 역주" 신서원 2009

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.92 0.92 0.81
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.78 0.81 1.498 0.27
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼