Extracorporeal circulation (ECC) is an integral part of cardiac surgery. Yet, the contact with artificial surfaces, mechanical stress, shear, and suction forces within the ECC pose a pronounced risk for damaging the corpuscular components of the blood...
Extracorporeal circulation (ECC) is an integral part of cardiac surgery. Yet, the contact with artificial surfaces, mechanical stress, shear, and suction forces within the ECC pose a pronounced risk for damaging the corpuscular components of the blood. These suction forces may be reduced by a repositioning of the roller pumps employed below the reservoir. Furthermore, the repeated compression of the involved silicone tubing is likely to cause degradation. We present our observations regarding changes in the ECC performance following this degradation process. In vitro experiments were performed in a standard as well as a simplified ECC setup and included measurements of pressure, effective flow, and tubing restoring force over a time frame of 12 hours with two different pump positions utilizing transit time flow measurement. Suction forces within the tubing could be significantly reduced by shifting the pump position below the reservoir. Regardless of the setup, the tubing showed significant loss of restoring force as well as effective flow over time. A shift of the pump position within the ECC setup can be recommended to prevent blood damaging negative pressures. Further research is necessary to evaluate the exact cause of the reduction of restoring force overtime as well as its risks for the patients. Finally, our results underline the importance of transit time flow measurements to collect reliable flow data.
This study aims to evaluate four pacemaker pocket cleaning methods for preventing implantation‐related infections. This single‐center trial prospectively randomized 910 patients undergoing first‐time pacemaker implantation or replacement into four pocket cleaning methods: hemocoagulase (group A, n = 228), gentamicin (group B, n = 228), hemocoagulase plus gentamicin (group C, n = 227), and normal saline (group D, n = 227). The application of hemocoagulase, gentamicin, hemocoagulase plus gentamicin, or normal saline on the presoaked gauze before implantation was equally effective in preventing pocket‐associated infections.