朝日 文士의 朝鮮 山과 日本 富士山 優劣 比較 硏究 - 通信使行 시기의 문학적 기록을 중심으로 = A Comparative Study about Superiority and Inferiority between Mountains in Chosun and Mt. Fuji by Litererary Men in Chosun and Japan - Mainly Focused on Literary Works of Dispatch of Envoy period

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study is for comparison of superiority and inferiority between mountains in Chosun and Mt. Fuji by literary men from 4th to 11th dispatch of envoy. This study tried to clear up comparison standard and an aspect of pressing moment convincing that Mt. Baekdu and Mt. Kumkang was pride to Chosun’s literary men and so was Mt. Fuji to those of Japan. It is as follows.
Literary men in Chosun and Japan were in no mood to compare between Mt. Baekdu and Mt. Fuji because they thought two mountains were mother and child relationships. Even though there were no effective measures except Mt. Baekdu to take the initiative, Chosun’s literary men restrain themselves because they were afraid to take criticism for holding their own comparative objectives from Japanese literary men. Mt. Baekdu was not in the same class as Mt. Fuji from the beginning so Japanese literary men tried not to compare two mountains because they were afraid to suffer a loss than profit from blame of denying the source of a mountain. Though the intention was vary from Chosun to Japan, it seemed to become consuetudinary not to compare Mt. Baekdu and Mt. Fuji. Because of this, comparison of superiority and inferiority between Mt. Kumkang and Mt. Fuji was the central axis between the two countries.
In this comparative study, Japan set up a standard of mysterious aspect and height of the mountain. On the other hand, Chosun chose mysterious aspect and various shapes as a standard so the comparative standards between the two countries were different from the beginning. Chosun’s literary men doubted Seobul and the wonder children and tried to belittle mysterious aspect of Mt. Fuji. It threw Japenese literary men into confusion. So they presented the grounds that shrine of Seobul remained and the descendants of wonder children were still lived as Mr. Jin in Japan. Japanese literary men challenged to those of Chosun putting up the height of Mt. Fuji. But it was the best thing that Chosun’s literary men gave them tit for tat with 12,000 peaks of Mt. Kumkang which had various shapes. This was the most contradictory part of this comparative study and it was impossible to fill up the gap between the two. According to strangeness putting up mysterious aspect, height and an external shape, Mt. Kumkang was similar to extraordinariness but Mt. Fuji was to oddness.
Literary men of the two countries never gave up their own comparative standards and therefore the comparative aspect showed an obvious differences. It was regrettable that they did the comparative study without any mutual agreement. But it was meaningful to confirm the fact that the two countries compared two mountains with their each and every standards for a long time.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study is for comparison of superiority and inferiority between mountains in Chosun and Mt. Fuji by literary men from 4th to 11th dispatch of envoy. This study tried to clear up comparison standard and an aspect of pressing moment convincing that Mt. Baekdu and Mt. Kumkang was pride to Chosun’s literary men and so was Mt. Fuji to those of Japan. It is as follows.
Literary men in Chosun and Japan were in no mood to compare between Mt. Baekdu and Mt. Fuji because they thought two mountains were mother and child relationships. Even though there were no effective measures except Mt. Baekdu to take the initiative, Chosun’s literary men restrain themselves because they were afraid to take criticism for holding their own comparative objectives from Japanese literary men. Mt. Baekdu was not in the same class as Mt. Fuji from the beginning so Japanese literary men tried not to compare two mountains because they were afraid to suffer a loss than profit from blame of denying the source of a mountain. Though the intention was vary from Chosun to Japan, it seemed to become consuetudinary not to compare Mt. Baekdu and Mt. Fuji. Because of this, comparison of superiority and inferiority between Mt. Kumkang and Mt. Fuji was the central axis between the two countries.
In this comparative study, Japan set up a standard of mysterious aspect and height of the mountain. On the other hand, Chosun chose mysterious aspect and various shapes as a standard so the comparative standards between the two countries were different from the beginning. Chosun’s literary men doubted Seobul and the wonder children and tried to belittle mysterious aspect of Mt. Fuji. It threw Japenese literary men into confusion. So they presented the grounds that shrine of Seobul remained and the descendants of wonder children were still lived as Mr. Jin in Japan. Japanese literary men challenged to those of Chosun putting up the height of Mt. Fuji. But it was the best thing that Chosun’s literary men gave them tit for tat with 12,000 peaks of Mt. Kumkang which had various shapes. This was the most contradictory part of this comparative study and it was impossible to fill up the gap between the two. According to strangeness putting up mysterious aspect, height and an external shape, Mt. Kumkang was similar to extraordinariness but Mt. Fuji was to oddness.
Literary men of the two countries never gave up their own comparative standards and therefore the comparative aspect showed an obvious differences. It was regrettable that they did the comparative study without any mutual agreement. But it was meaningful to confirm the fact that the two countries compared two mountains with their each and every standards for a long time.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "兩關唱和集"

2 구지현, "필담을 통한 한일 문사 교류의 전개와 양상-赤間關을 중심으로" 延世大學校 國學硏究院 138 : 269-302, 2007

3 李慧淳, "조선통신사의 문학" 이화여자대학교 출판부 1996

4 정응수, "조선통신사가 바라본 후지산(富士山)(1)-1차 통신사부터 5차 통신사까지를 중심으로" 한국일본문화학회 27 : 1-16, 2005

5 趙絅, "龍洲先生遺稿" 민족문화추진회 1992

6 申維翰, "靑泉集" 민족문화추진회 1997

7 "長門癸甲問"

8 魯認, "錦溪集" 민족문화추진회 1991

9 林? 等編, "通航一覽"

10 趙泰億, "謙齋集" 민족문화추진회 1997

11 南龍翼, "聞見別錄" 민족문화추진회 1975

12 黃, "漫浪集" 민족문화추진회 1993

13 趙, "海?日記" 민족문화추진회 1975

14 "桑韓唱酬集"

15 "桑韓唱和塤?集"

16 金世濂, "東溟先生集" 민족문화추진회 1992

17 洪汝河, "木齋集" 민족문화추진회 1994

18 上田 正昭?辛基秀?仲尾, "朝鮮通信使とその時代" 明石書店 2001

19 李元植, "朝鮮通信使" 民音社 1991

20 임채명, "朝日 文士의 筆談唱酬에 나타난 富士山 인식 양상-7차 使行(1682년)을 중심으로" 檀國大學校 日本硏究所 24 : 159-186, 2008

21 曺命采, "奉使日本時聞見錄" 민족문화추진회 1975

22 南龍翼, "壺谷集" 민족문화추진회 1994

23 "善隣風雅後編"

24 "和韓唱酬集"

25 李慧淳, "18세기 韓日文士의 金剛山-富士山의 우열 논쟁과 그 의미" 한국한문학연구회 14 : 203-221, 1991