RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Evaluation of Thermal Hysteresis Activity of Ice-binding Proteins Using Ice-etching and Molecular Docking

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105258887

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Ice-binding proteins have an affinity for ice. They create a gap between the melting and freezing points by inhibiting the growth of ice, known as thermal hysteresis (TH). Interestingly, moderately active LeIBP and hyperactive FfIBP are almost identical in primary and tertiary structures, but differ in TH activity. The TH of FfIBP is tenfold higher than that of LeIBP, due to a subtle difference in their ice-binding motifs. To further evaluate the difference in TH, the interactions were investigated by ice-etching and molecular docking. Ice-etching showed that FfIBP binds to the primary and secondary prism, pyramidal, and basal planes; previously, LeIBP was found to bind to the basal and primary prism planes. Docking analysis using shape complementarity (Sc) showed that the hyperactive FfIBP had higher Sc values for all four ice planes than LeIBP, which is comparable with TH. Docking can be used to describe the hyperactivity of IBPs.
      번역하기

      Ice-binding proteins have an affinity for ice. They create a gap between the melting and freezing points by inhibiting the growth of ice, known as thermal hysteresis (TH). Interestingly, moderately active LeIBP and hyperactive FfIBP are almost identic...

      Ice-binding proteins have an affinity for ice. They create a gap between the melting and freezing points by inhibiting the growth of ice, known as thermal hysteresis (TH). Interestingly, moderately active LeIBP and hyperactive FfIBP are almost identical in primary and tertiary structures, but differ in TH activity. The TH of FfIBP is tenfold higher than that of LeIBP, due to a subtle difference in their ice-binding motifs. To further evaluate the difference in TH, the interactions were investigated by ice-etching and molecular docking. Ice-etching showed that FfIBP binds to the primary and secondary prism, pyramidal, and basal planes; previously, LeIBP was found to bind to the basal and primary prism planes. Docking analysis using shape complementarity (Sc) showed that the hyperactive FfIBP had higher Sc values for all four ice planes than LeIBP, which is comparable with TH. Docking can be used to describe the hyperactivity of IBPs.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Ritchie, D. W., 26 : 2398-, 2010

      2 Do, H., 68 : 806-, 2012

      3 Cheng, J., 473 : 4011-, 2016

      4 Momma, K., 44 : 1272-, 2011

      5 Graham, L. A., 47 : 2051-, 2008

      6 Mok, Y. F., 49 : 2593-, 2010

      7 Lin, F. H., 50 : 4467-, 2011

      8 Sun, T., 343 : 795-, 2014

      9 Scotter, A. J., 53 : 229-, 2006

      10 Kim, H. J., 27-, 2017

      1 Ritchie, D. W., 26 : 2398-, 2010

      2 Do, H., 68 : 806-, 2012

      3 Cheng, J., 473 : 4011-, 2016

      4 Momma, K., 44 : 1272-, 2011

      5 Graham, L. A., 47 : 2051-, 2008

      6 Mok, Y. F., 49 : 2593-, 2010

      7 Lin, F. H., 50 : 4467-, 2011

      8 Sun, T., 343 : 795-, 2014

      9 Scotter, A. J., 53 : 229-, 2006

      10 Kim, H. J., 27-, 2017

      11 Davies, P. L., 548-, 2014

      12 Bar Dolev, M., 85 : 515-, 2016

      13 Raymond, J. A., 108 : E198-, 2011

      14 Raymond, J. A., 7 : e35968-, 2012

      15 Raymond, J. A., 61 : 214-, 2007

      16 Kristiansen, E., 51 : 262-, 2005

      17 Fletcher, G. L., 63 : 359-, 2001

      18 Lee, S. G., 667-, 2013

      19 Graham, L. A., 388 : 727-, 1997

      20 Graether, S. P., 406 : 325-, 2000

      21 Hanada, Y., 2011

      22 Raymond, J. A., 74 : 2589-, 1977

      23 Knight, C. A., 59 : 409-, 1991

      24 Drori, R., 11 : 20140526-, 2014

      25 Pertaya, N., 95 : 333-, 2008

      26 Park, K. S., 64 : 286-, 2012

      27 Lee, J. H., 287 : 11460-, 2012

      28 Do, H., 70 : 1061-, 2014

      29 Nishimiya, Y., 278 : 32307-, 2003

      30 Baardsnes, J., 278 : 38942-, 2003

      31 Jia, Z., 27 : 101-, 2002

      32 Nutt, D. R., 130 : 13066-, 2008

      33 Garnham, C. P., 108 : 7363-, 2011

      34 Leinala, E. K., 10 : 619-, 2002

      35 Doucet, D., 267 : 6082-, 2000

      36 Graether, S. P., 81 : 1677-, 2001

      37 Bartels-Rausch, T., 84 : 885-, 2012

      38 Fortes, A. D., 120 : 11376-, 2004

      39 Hew, C. L., 203 : 33-, 1992

      40 Garnham, C. P., 49 : 9063-, 2010

      41 Howard, E. I., 24 : 724-, 2011

      42 Hanada, Y., 281 : 3576-, 2014

      43 Lee, J. K., 60 : 222-, 2010

      44 Lawrence, M. C., 234 : 946-, 1993

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.21 0.21 0.18
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.18 0.14 0.364 0.05
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼