RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      지각된 가치에 기반 한 브랜드 명성에 관한 실증적 연구 = An Empirical Study on Brand Reputation Based on Perceived Value

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103799365

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In a study of existing brand reputation and brand reputation is high, low, good, bad, positive, negative, and explains that the absolute level of reputation and brand levels compared with competing brands. Such a level that previous studies have confi...

      In a study of existing brand reputation and brand reputation is high, low, good, bad, positive, negative, and explains that the absolute level of reputation and brand levels compared with competing brands. Such a level that previous studies have confirmed the presence of brand reputation, brand reputation, theoretically proven that description, the lack of research on the factors that lead to brand reputation, a strategy utilizing the brand reputation and brand reputation management has limitations have. So this study overcomes the limitations of existing research, the, to be able to develop and utilize strategies and manage brand reputation in the development theory, many researchers have commonly perceived value that describes the brand reputation is causing the brand reputation cause as a component of brand reputation that will be explained to the empirical validation.
      For the formative indicator in the structural equation model, the indicators can be defined in the properties of the latent variables, as the cause of the difference of latent variables which severity indicators that verification is possible. Therefore, this study was to utilize the formative indicator to verify that the indicators for the four perceived value (quality, price, emotional, and social) can be defined by the characteristics of the brand reputation to cause a brand reputation. In order to verify the formative indicators AMOS shall be verified through the formative indicators and reflective indicator in mixed MIMIC model. And the results are verified by the MIMIC model was verified by leveraging Two-Construct models to ensure that you have a theoretical construct validity. Questionnaire for this study was carried out by direct survey approach targeting two weeks, Kyung Hee University undergraduate and graduate students. 198 of 216 survey questionnaires are available utilizing the proportion of women (63.6%) was higher than in men (36.4%).
      Results are four kinds of perceived value (quality, price, emotional, social) have been identified as factors explaining the nature of the brand configured to cause a renowned brand reputation. Even theoretically correct perceived value factors identified factors that lead to brand reputation through a proven brand trust, brand reputation has been confirmed to have a positive impact on the brand you trust. Important factors for the four perceived value to induce brand reputation ranking of importance (quality, price, emotional, and social) are perceived quality, perceived social, perceived price, perceived feelings were confirmed by the order. Perceived value is a perception that the product level for the price the consumer wants, in previous studies of higher quality, perceived value positively asserted that higher prices higher perceived negatively. Perceived price identified as an important factor in causing the brand reputation is negative (-) by indicating the direction of the case to induce the brand reputation and quality without the high price because the perceived positive perception of social status, build brand reputation is negatively that it can be can be inferred from the findings.
      This was based on the perceived value of brand reputation is the result of empirical studies is that consumers think the price or brand reputation functionally superior quality than the emotional part, and it was confirmed that there is a greater significance to strengthen the social status. If the symbol of excellent features and social status through the results of this study and of the products that increase the quality products and trusted brands such as car less sensitive to price, on a positive impact on the purchasing process for consumers to take advantage of brand reputation is important as a marketing strategy must have been identified. And brand managers as a result that can contribute to the brand reputation management through the identification and comparison of competing brands on the main causes that ...

      더보기

      국문 초록 (Abstract)

      기존 브랜드 명성의 연구에서는 브랜드 명성을 높고, 낮고, 좋고, 나쁘고, 긍정적이고, 부정적이라는 절대적 수준이나 경쟁브랜드와 비교하는 수준으로 브랜드 명성을 설명하고 있다. 이런 ...

      기존 브랜드 명성의 연구에서는 브랜드 명성을 높고, 낮고, 좋고, 나쁘고, 긍정적이고, 부정적이라는 절대적 수준이나 경쟁브랜드와 비교하는 수준으로 브랜드 명성을 설명하고 있다. 이런 기존 연구들은 브랜드 명성을 확인하는 것 외에 브랜드 명성을 활용한 전략 수립이나 브랜드 명성 관리를 위해 활용하는 데는 한계점을 가지고 있다. 그래서 본 연구는 지각된 가치 4가지(품질, 가격, 감정, 사회) 측정지표가 브랜드 명성을 야기하는 중요한 구성 요인으로 브랜드 신뢰에도 영향을 미치는 것을 MIMIC 모형과 Two - Construct 모형을 통해 실증적으로 검증하였다. 지각된 가치 4가지(품질, 가격, 감정, 사회) 차원이 브랜드 명성을 유발하는 구성 요인임이 검증되었으며, 브랜드 명성을 유발하는 지각된 가치 4가지(품질, 가격, 감정, 사회) 차원 중 중요도 순위는 지각된 품질, 지각된 사회, 지각된 가격, 지각된 감정 순으로 확인되었다. 본 연구 결과는 선행 연구에서 검증되었던 지각된 품질 뿐 아니라 브랜드 명성을 유발하는 원인으로 지각된 사회도 소비자들에게 중요하게 지각됨이 확인되었으며, 부(-)의 방향이 나온 지각된 가격의 경우 품질과 사회의 긍정적 지각없이 높은 가격만으로는 긍정적 브랜드 명성을 구축 할 수 없음을 유추 해 볼 수 있다. 이 연구 결과는 브랜드 명성을 유발하는 요인으로 검증 된 지각된 가치 4가기(품질, 가격, 감정, 사회)를 통해 브랜드 관리자들은 자신의 브랜드 명성 구축에 영향을 주는 주요 원인에 대한 파악 및 경쟁 브랜드와의 비교가 가능하여 브랜드 명성에 대한 이론 및 실무적 기여가 클 것이라 예상한다.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김현철, "지각된 가격 수준에 따른 지각된 품질과 가치의 영향력 차이" 한국기업경영학회 21 (21): 35-56, 2014

      2 김중인, "반영지표 vs. 조형지표: 이론적 논의, 실증적 비교, 그리고 실무적 유용성" 한국마케팅학회 27 (27): 199-226, 2012

      3 안우영, "대도시권 간선교통축의 통행비용을 활용한 대중교통 서비스의 중요도 분석" 한국교통연구원 21 (21): 1-12, 2014

      4 이보경, "내구재에서의 지각된 가치 결정변수에 관한 실증적 연구" 한국기업경영학회 17 (17): 143-162, 2010

      5 우종필, "구조방정식모델 개념과 이해" 한나래아카데미 2012

      6 Babin, B. J., "Work and/or Fun : Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value" 20 (20): 644-656, 1994

      7 Sheth, J. N., "Why We Buy What We Buy : A Theory of Consumption Values" 22 (22): 159-170, 1991

      8 Stern. I., "Unmixed Signals : How Reputation and Status Affect Alliance Formation" 35 (35): 512-531, 2014

      9 Hall, R., "The Strategic Analysis of Intangible Resources" 13 (13): 135-145, 1992

      10 Fombrun, C, "The Reputational landscape" 1 (1): 5-13, 1997

      1 김현철, "지각된 가격 수준에 따른 지각된 품질과 가치의 영향력 차이" 한국기업경영학회 21 (21): 35-56, 2014

      2 김중인, "반영지표 vs. 조형지표: 이론적 논의, 실증적 비교, 그리고 실무적 유용성" 한국마케팅학회 27 (27): 199-226, 2012

      3 안우영, "대도시권 간선교통축의 통행비용을 활용한 대중교통 서비스의 중요도 분석" 한국교통연구원 21 (21): 1-12, 2014

      4 이보경, "내구재에서의 지각된 가치 결정변수에 관한 실증적 연구" 한국기업경영학회 17 (17): 143-162, 2010

      5 우종필, "구조방정식모델 개념과 이해" 한나래아카데미 2012

      6 Babin, B. J., "Work and/or Fun : Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value" 20 (20): 644-656, 1994

      7 Sheth, J. N., "Why We Buy What We Buy : A Theory of Consumption Values" 22 (22): 159-170, 1991

      8 Stern. I., "Unmixed Signals : How Reputation and Status Affect Alliance Formation" 35 (35): 512-531, 2014

      9 Hall, R., "The Strategic Analysis of Intangible Resources" 13 (13): 135-145, 1992

      10 Fombrun, C, "The Reputational landscape" 1 (1): 5-13, 1997

      11 Chris, S., "The Reputation Debate" 2 : 1-4, 2007

      12 Herbig, P., "The Relationship of Reputation and Credibility to Brand Success" 2 (2): 4-10, 1995

      13 Jarvis, W. B. G., "The Need to Evaluate" 70 (70): 172-194, 1996

      14 Ward, J. C., "The Internet as Information Minefield: An Analysis of the Source and Content of Brand Information Yielded by Net Searches" 56 (56): 907-914, 2003

      15 Fombrun, C, "The Expressive Organization : Linking Identity, Reputation, and the Corporate Brand" Oxford 2000

      16 Ralston R. W., "The Effects of Customer Service, Branding, and Price on the Perceived Value of Local Telephone Service" 56 : 201-213, 2003

      17 Cabral, L., "The Dynamics of Seller eputation : Evidence from eBay" 58 (58): 54-78, 2010

      18 Dahlén, M. A., "The Consumer Perceived Value of Non Traditional Media : Effects of Brand Reputation, Appropriateness and Expense" 26 (26): 155-163, 2009

      19 Chang, Y., "The Brand Leadership : Scale Development and Validation" 21 : 63-80, 2014

      20 Holbrook, M. B., "Service Quality:New directions in Theory and Practice" Sage Publications 21-71, 1994

      21 Li, K., "Service Operations and Logistics and Informatics" 7-10, 2010

      22 김호정, "SPSS21. 0 통계분석 및 해설" 탑북스 2013

      23 Fombrun, C, "Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image" Havard Business School Press 1996

      24 MacMillan, K., "Reputation in Relationships : Measuring Experiences, Emotions and Behaviors" 8 (8): 214-232, 2005

      25 Argenti, P. A., "Re putation and the Corporate Brand" 6 (6): 368-374, 2004

      26 Groenland, E. A. G., "Qualitative Research to Validate the RQ-Dimensions" 4 (4): 309-315, 2002

      27 Molina-Castillo, F. J., "Product Quality as a Formative Index: Evaluating an Alternative Measurement Approach" 30 (30): 380-398, 2013

      28 Jacoby, J., "Price, Brand Name, and Product Composition Characteristics as Determinants of Perceived Quality" 55 : 570-579, 1971

      29 Shapiro, C., "Premiums for High Quality Products as Returns to Reputations" 98 (98): 659-680, 1983

      30 Priporas, C., "Perceptions of Potential Postgraduate Greek Business Students towards UK Universitis, Brand and Brand Reputation" 18 : 264-273, 2011

      31 Ha, J., "Perceived Values, Satisfaction, and Behavioral intentions : The Role of Familiarity in Korean Restaurants" 29 (29): 2-13, 2010

      32 Kortge. G. D., "Perceived Value Approach to Pricing" 22 (22): 133-140, 1993

      33 Rowley, J., "Online Branding" 28 (28): 131-138, 2004

      34 Chin, W. W., "Modern methods for buadresearch, Psychology Press" 295-336, 1998

      35 Deephouse, D. L., "Media Reputation as a Strategic Resource : An Integration of Mass Communication and Resource Based Theories" 26 (26): 1091-1112, 2000

      36 Ulaga, W., "Measuring Customer Perceived Value in Business Markets : A Prerequisite for Marketing Strategy Development and Implementation" 30 (30): 525-540, 2001

      37 Dawar, N., "Marketing Universals : Consumers’ Use of brand Name, Price, Physical Appearance, and Retailer" 58 (58): 81-95, 1994

      38 Gaultier-Gaillard, S. J., "Managing Reputational Risk From Theory to Practice" 161-178, 2009

      39 Gale, B. T., "Managing Customer Value:Creating Quality and Service that Customer Can See" New York 1994

      40 Ward, R . M, "Internet Shopping, Consumer Search and Product Branding" 9 (9): 6-20, 2000

      41 Riahi-Belkaoui, A., "Intellectual Capital and Firm Performance of US Multinational Firms" 4 (4): 215-226, 2003

      42 Diamantopoulos, A., "Index Construction with Formative Indicators:An Alternative to Scale Development" 38 (38): 269-277, 2001

      43 Chaudhuri, A., "How Brand Reputation Affects The Advertising Brand Equity Link" 42 (42): 33-43, 2002

      44 Amis, J., "Good Things Come to Those Who Wait : The strategic management of Image and Reputation at Guinness" 3 : 189-214, 2003

      45 Barney, J., "Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage" 17 (17): 99-120, 1991

      46 Helm, S., "Exploring the Impact of Corporate Reputation on Consumer Satisfaction and Loyalty" 5 (5): 59-80, 2006

      47 Chen, C. F., "Experience Quality, Perceived Value, Satisfaction and Behavioral Intentions for Heritage Tourist" 31 (31): 29-35, 2010

      48 Allen, N. J., "Employee Commitment to the Organization and Customer Reactions Mapping the Linkages" 11 (11): 209-236, 2001

      49 Akdeniz, B., "Effectiveness of Marketing Cues on Consumer Perceptions of Quality : The Moderating Roles of Brand Reputation and Third-Party Information" 30 (30): 76-89, 2013

      50 Purohit. D., "Effect of Manufacturer Reputation, Retailer Reputation, and Product Warranty on Consumer Judgments of Product Quality : A cue Diagnosticity Framework" 10 : 123-134, 2001

      51 Dennis, B., "Developing Parsimonious Retailer Equity Indexes Using Partial Least Squares Analysis : A Method and Application" 79 : 161-170, 2003

      52 Walsh, G., "Customer based Corporate Reputation of a Service Firm : Scale Development and Validation" 35 (35): 127-143, 2007

      53 Woodruff, R. B., "Customer Value: The Next Source for Competitive Advantage" 25 (25): 139-153, 1997

      54 Graft, A, "Customer Value from a Customer Perspective: A Comprehensive Review" 58 (58): 1-20, 2008

      55 Crossref A. G., "Customer Value from a Customer Perspective : A Comprehensive Review" 58 (58): 1-20, 2008

      56 Eggert, A., "Customer Perceived Value: A Substitute for Satisfaction in Business Markets?" 17 (17): 107-118, 2002

      57 Kowalczyk, S. J,., "Corporate Branding Through External Perception of Organizational Culture" 5 (5): 159-174, 2002

      58 Afzal, H., "Consumer’s Trust in the Brand: Can it Be Built through Brand Reputation, Brand Competence and Brand Predictability" 3 (3): 43-51, 2010

      59 Lau, G. T., "Consumers’Trust in a Brand and the Link to Brand Loyalty" 4 : 341-370, 1999

      60 Grabner-Kräuter, S., "Consumer Trust in Electronic Commerce: Conceptualization and Classification of Trust Building measures" Edward Elgar Publishing 2008

      61 Zeithaml, V. A., "Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value A Means End Model and Synthesis of Evidence" 52 (52): 2-22, 1988

      62 Sweeneya, J. C., "Consumer Perceived Value : The Development of a Multiple Item Scale" 77 (77): 203-220, 2001

      63 Aaker, D., "Consumer Evaluation of Brand Extension" 54 (54): 27-41, 1990

      64 Amblee, N., "Can Brand Rep utation Improve the Odds of Being Reviewed On-Line?" 12 (12): 11-28, 2008

      65 Erdem, T., "Brand equity as a Signaling Phenomenon" 7 : 131-157, 1998

      66 Zhang, M., "Brand Reputaion in International Marketing Case of Mobile Telephone Companies" Halmstad University 2007

      67 Veloutsou, C., "Brand Relationships Through Brand Reputation and Brand Tribalism" 62 : 314-322, 2009

      68 Strike, V. M., "Being Good While being Bad : Social Responsibility and the International Diversification of US Firms" 37 : 850-862, 2006

      69 신재익, "B2C 전자상거래의 소비자-브랜드 관계품질, 재구매의도, 구전간의 관계에 관한 연구" 한국기업경영학회 13 (13): 191-207, 2006

      70 Selnes, F., "An Examination of the Effect of Product Performance on Brand Reputation, Satisfaction and Loyalty" 27 (27): 19-35, 1993

      71 Yu. B, "An Empirical Research on the Relationship between Brand Reputation and Brand Loyalty Influenced by the Impact of Product-harm Crisis Management" 15 : 699-705, 2008

      72 Jarvis, C. B., "Acritical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research" 30 : 199-218, 2003

      73 Bolton, R. N., "A Multistage Model of Customers’ Assessments of Services Quality and Value" 17 (17): 375-384, 1991

      74 Portmann, E., "A Fuzzy Grassroots Ontology for Online Reputation Management" Springer 2013

      75 지피코리아, "30대 연령`수입차 큰손 됐다. 50대 이상은 BMW 선호"

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-03-13 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> Korean Corporation Management Association KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.56 1.56 1.63
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.75 1.7 2.494 0.42
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼