RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      韓日憲法比較分析

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60023015

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper comparatively analyzed the clauses of the people's fundamental rights and duties, and the governmental structure, in the Consitutional Law of Korea and Japan. Constitutional Law of Japan has provisions similar to those of Korea, as far as the people's rights and duties. But, in that Constitutional Law of Japan prescribes the nature of fundamental rights, the freedum of renunciation of nationality, the right of recalling, etc, it is different from Constitutional Law of Korea.
      However, in that Korea and Japan are different from the form of government, Japan's related Consitutional regulations(the powers of Cabinet, general resignation of Cabinet, the powers of Congress, the dissolution of the Lower House, etc.) and their experiences on the parliamentary system give a good example to Korea in particular considering the Constitutional revision from the presidential system to the parliamentary system.
      번역하기

      This paper comparatively analyzed the clauses of the people's fundamental rights and duties, and the governmental structure, in the Consitutional Law of Korea and Japan. Constitutional Law of Japan has provisions similar to those of Korea, as far as t...

      This paper comparatively analyzed the clauses of the people's fundamental rights and duties, and the governmental structure, in the Consitutional Law of Korea and Japan. Constitutional Law of Japan has provisions similar to those of Korea, as far as the people's rights and duties. But, in that Constitutional Law of Japan prescribes the nature of fundamental rights, the freedum of renunciation of nationality, the right of recalling, etc, it is different from Constitutional Law of Korea.
      However, in that Korea and Japan are different from the form of government, Japan's related Consitutional regulations(the powers of Cabinet, general resignation of Cabinet, the powers of Congress, the dissolution of the Lower House, etc.) and their experiences on the parliamentary system give a good example to Korea in particular considering the Constitutional revision from the presidential system to the parliamentary system.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 序論
      • Ⅱ. 總綱(總則)
      • Ⅲ. 國民の權利と義務
      • 1. 國民の權利
      • 2. 國民の義務
      • Ⅰ. 序論
      • Ⅱ. 總綱(總則)
      • Ⅲ. 國民の權利と義務
      • 1. 國民の權利
      • 2. 國民の義務
      • Ⅳ. 統治構造
      • 1. 國會
      • 2. 政府
      • 3. 司法府
      • Ⅴ. 經濟秩序
      • Ⅵ. 結論
      • 參考文獻
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼