RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Eugenics  :  Anxiety & Revulsion, Socrates & Habermas

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60163186

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper argues that the anxiety and moral revulsion generated by eugenic projects in contemporary liberal sensibilities can be understood (and perhaps mastered) through an engagement with Socrates’ and Habermas’ thinking on the matter. In THE R...

      This paper argues that the anxiety and moral revulsion generated by eugenic projects in contemporary liberal sensibilities can be understood (and perhaps mastered) through an engagement with Socrates’ and Habermas’ thinking on the matter. In THE REPUBLIC, Socrates and his cohort of young men stand before the same crossroads we find ourselves today. The cohort are required to make the anxiety-laden decision between the path of the ‘simple’ city, the path Nature has smoothed out for humankind, and the ‘creative’ city, a way of life that slips the boundaries and harmony of Nature. In place of the natural limits escaped by the choice of the ‘creative’ city, Socrates generates moral boundaries to quell the anxiety induced by the introduction of unlimited desires and unimagined human power into city. But the moral guideline Socrates suggests for the use of eugenics is unacceptable to liberal sensibilities. Habermas suggests an explanation of the moral revulsion generated by liberal sensibilities at eugenics. From this understanding, we can fashion a moral guideline (less strict than the one Habermas proposes) to allow the power of genetic modification into contemporary society in a way that does not induce anxiety or moral revulsion.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Abstract
      • I. Socrates’ choice between eugenics and the ‘simple city’
      • II. Habermas and liberal moral objections to Socrates’ eugenic plans
      • NOTES
      • Abstract
      • I. Socrates’ choice between eugenics and the ‘simple city’
      • II. Habermas and liberal moral objections to Socrates’ eugenic plans
      • NOTES
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼