한국인의 영어 논문과 작문에 나타나는 관계사 사용의 변이 = Variability in the Usage of English Relatives by Koreans Observed in English Academic Articles and Compositions

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper examines variation found in the usage of English relatives by Korean users and learners of English. Two types of data are analyzed using Varbrul analysis: academic articles written by English major professors and compositions by college students majoring and minoring in English. The results of analyses can be summarized as follows: 1) Korean users and learners of English adopt wh-variants more frequently than Americans for use but less commonly than Britons, 2) Advanced English users generally show the usage pattern of English relatives similar to that of native English speakers conditioned by very similar linguistic constraints, 3) Korean English learners with intermediate proficiency level revealed somewhat different patterns of English relative use from those of native English speakers and advanced Korean English users, 4) Prescriptive grammar taught in middle and high schools is analyzed as exerting significant influence on the pattern of English relative use by Korean users and learners of English.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 송성문, "정통종합영어" 성문사 2007

2 Gisborne, N., "clauses in Hong Kong English in: Hong Kong English: Autonomy and Creativity" Hong Kong University Press 141-160, 2002

3 Terkel, S., "Working.New" Avon 1975

4 Newbrook, M., "Which way? That way? Variation and ongoing changes in the English relative clause" 17 : 43-59, 1998

5 Levey, S., "Visiting London relatives" 27 : 45-70, 2006

6 Cheshire, J., "Variation in an English Dialect" Cambridge University Press 1982

7 Shnukal. A., "There's a Lot Mightn't Believe This ... : Variable subject relative pronoun absence in Australian English in: Variation Omnibus" Linguistic Research 312-328, 1981

8 Bisenbach-Lucas, S., "The use of relative markers in modern American English in: Variation in Language: NWAV-XV at Stanford" Stanford University,Linguistics Depa 13-21, 1987

9 Kikai, A., "The influence of syntactic position on relativization strategies in: Variation in Language" NWAV-XV at Stanford 267-277, 1987

10 Greenbaum, S., "The Oxford English Grammar" Oxford University Press 1996

11 Peitsara, K., "Somerset relativizers revisited in: Types of Variation: Diachronic, Dialectal and Typological Interfaces" John Benjamins 269-280, 2006

12 Jung, K. T., "Some lexico-grammatical features of Korean English Newspapers" 18 : 23-37, 1999

13 Adamson, H. D., "Social and processing constraints on relative clauses" 69 : 71-79, 1992

14 "Seppa쮖en, A. (1999). Dialectal variation in English relativization. Lingua 109, 15-34"

15 Tottie, G., "Relativization strategies in earlier African American vernacular English" 9 : 219-248, 1997

16 Bayley, R., "Relativization strategies in Mexican-English" 74 : 115-139, 1999

17 Karstadt, A., "Relative markers in Swedish-American English: Evidence for a contact language phenomenon?" 71 : 27-48, 1996

18 Quirk, R., "Relative clauses in educated spoken English" 38 : 97-109, 1957

19 Guy, G. R., "On the choice of relative pronouns in English" 70 : 148-162, 1995

20 Flanigan, B. O., "Object relative pronoun use in native and non-native English" 7 : 203-226, 1996

21 Tagliamonte, S.., "No taming the vernacular! Insights from the relatives in Northern Britain" 17 : 75-112, 2005

22 김덕기, "High School English II" 금성출판사 2007

23 이맹성, "High School English I" 지학사 2007

24 Sankoff, D., "Goldvarb X: A multivariate analysis application" University of Ottawa 2005

25 Ball, C. N. A., "Diachronic study of relative markers in spoken and written English" 7 : 227-258, 1996

26 Hackenberg, R., "Appalachian English: A Sociolinguistic Study" Georgetown University 1972

27 Guy, G. R., "Advanced varbrul analysis" 30 : 124-136, 1988