RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      先秦至兩宋儒家人性論再思考 = Re-examination of Confucian theories of human natural tendency from pre-Qin to Sung period

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107268483

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The humanity is a basic problem of the Chinese ancient philosophy. Confucian scarcely talked about the universal rule, but he said that the person of humane could be called the true human. Humane person care for human, humanity is the basic character of human. Since Mengzi, Chinese ancient humanity theory was certified the topic, when humanity was referred to. Thereafter, although there were Xunzi`s theory of evil humanity and theory of three classes of humanity by Dong Zhong shu of han period and han yu of tang period and the other theories about the humanity, all of these theories` precondition were good humanity. The good humanity, since Mengzi referred to it, mostly developed in song period and reached the summit. Around the years, humanity theory from qin to song is still popular topic. Many, new angles and views about the theory have been dig out. Some scholars emphasize that good humanity theory was the connotation of qin to song`s humanity theory. Humanity at heart in song period branched out good humanity theory from which Confucian and Mengzi. Some scholars say that good humanity, humanity of three classes, neither good nor evil humanity, these are all resort to the good humanity. Many scholars elaborately account for the origin and method of destiny learning in qin period. Some account for Chinese unique method of exceeding by oneself distinguished it from west religious exceeding, due to theory of good or evil humanity. In the view of comparison of culture, humanity theory has great significance and value.
      번역하기

      The humanity is a basic problem of the Chinese ancient philosophy. Confucian scarcely talked about the universal rule, but he said that the person of humane could be called the true human. Humane person care for human, humanity is the basic character ...

      The humanity is a basic problem of the Chinese ancient philosophy. Confucian scarcely talked about the universal rule, but he said that the person of humane could be called the true human. Humane person care for human, humanity is the basic character of human. Since Mengzi, Chinese ancient humanity theory was certified the topic, when humanity was referred to. Thereafter, although there were Xunzi`s theory of evil humanity and theory of three classes of humanity by Dong Zhong shu of han period and han yu of tang period and the other theories about the humanity, all of these theories` precondition were good humanity. The good humanity, since Mengzi referred to it, mostly developed in song period and reached the summit. Around the years, humanity theory from qin to song is still popular topic. Many, new angles and views about the theory have been dig out. Some scholars emphasize that good humanity theory was the connotation of qin to song`s humanity theory. Humanity at heart in song period branched out good humanity theory from which Confucian and Mengzi. Some scholars say that good humanity, humanity of three classes, neither good nor evil humanity, these are all resort to the good humanity. Many scholars elaborately account for the origin and method of destiny learning in qin period. Some account for Chinese unique method of exceeding by oneself distinguished it from west religious exceeding, due to theory of good or evil humanity. In the view of comparison of culture, humanity theory has great significance and value.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-12-20 학술지명변경 한글명 : 國際版<儒敎文化硏究> -> Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
      외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
      KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-06-13 학회명변경 영문명 : Institute of Confucian Cultural Studies -> Institute of Confucian Philosophy and Culture KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.1 0.1 0.08
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.06 0.04 0.351 0.1
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼