중국과 한국의 기술 혁신 체제를 비교 연구 : 화웨이와 삼성을 중심으로 = A Comparative Study on Technological Innovation Systems of China and Korea _Focusing on Huawei and Samsung

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

With the development of information technology revolution and economic globalization, knowledge and technology play a more important role in social production. In order to better improve national competitiveness, countries around the world pay more and more attention to scientific and technological innovation ability, and begin to establish and improve national innovation system, enhance their own technological innovation ability, and narrow the technological gap between countries.
China and South Korea, both built from the ashes, are striving to improve their national competitiveness. After years of establishment of the national innovation system, the national innovation system of both countries has basically taken shape. South Korea is recognized as an innovation-oriented country in the world. Scientific and technological innovation has played a significant role in fostering and supporting its economic development, which is also one of the main reasons why South Korea's economy continues to develop rapidly and ranks among developed countries. Especially Samsung electronics in South Korea has played an important role in national innovation construction. China's national innovation system, though not perfect, is constantly improving. In recent years, China's Huawei has demonstrated its strong innovation ability in its development, attracting worldwide attention.
This paper analyzes the construction of China and Korea through the model of national innovation system. At the same time, this paper will also take Huawei and Samsung electronics as the classic cases to analyze their technological innovation and development process, and make a comparison through the McKinsey 7S model analysis. Provide effective Suggestions for China's national innovation system and technological innovation development in other industries.
From the conclusion, we can draw the following Suggestions: the government should establish sound policies and regulations to ensure the construction of the national innovation system and provide a good environment for the construction of the national innovation system. The government should strengthen the guidance of enterprise R&D institutions and other private R&D institutions to carry out innovative R&D. Enterprises should accelerate the upgrading of their technological innovation capabilities.
Encourage, support and build enterprises' own technological innovation R&D institutions. It gives full play to the cohesive role of intermediary agencies and continuously promotes the cooperation between industry, university and research institute.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. Introduction 1
• 1.1. Selected topic significance 1
• 1.2. The purpose of research 3
• 1.3. The research methods 4
• 1.4. The paper structure 4
• 2. Theoretical framework 5
• 2.1. National System of Innovation 5
• 2.1.1. The subject of innovation activities 6
• 2.1.2. Connection and interaction of each factor 9
• 2.2. Technological innovation modes 9
• 2.2.1. Theoretical model of technological innovation 9
• 2.2.2. Classification of technological innovation 12
• 2.3. McKinsey 7S Framework 18
• 2.3.1. Hard elements 18
• 2.3.2. Soft elements 18
• 3. Comparative analysis of NIS between China and South Korea 19
• 3.1. China's NIS 19
• 3.1.1. The development of China's NIS 19
• 3.1.2. Composition of China's NIS 21
• 3.2. Korea's NIS 37
• 3.2.1. Development of South Korea's NIS 37
• 3.2.2. Composition of South Korea's NIS 38
• 3.3. The comparison of NIS between Huawei and Samsung 54
• 4. Huawei and Samsung McKinsey 7S model analysis 62
• 4.1. Huawei 62
• 4.1.1. Introduction of Huawei Company 62
• 4.1.2. Huawei McKinsey 7s model analysis 63
• 4.1.2.1. Huawei's organizational structure 63
• 4.1.2.2. Huawei's development strategy 67
• 4.1.2.3. Huawei system 68
• 4.1.2.4. Shared values of Huawei 69
• 4.1.2.5. Huawei style 70
• 4.1.2.6. Staff of Huawei 71
• 4.1.2.7. Huawei skills 71
• 4.2. Samsung 73
• 4.2.1. Introduction of Samsung 73
• 4.2.2. SamsungMcKinsey 7s model analysis 73
• 4.2.2.1. Structure of Samsung 73
• 4.2.2.2. Samsung development strategy 75
• 4.2.2.3. Samsung system 77
• 4.2.2.4. Shared values of Samsung 78
• 4.2.2.5. Samsung style 80
• 4.2.2.6. Staff of Samsung 81
• 4.2.2.7. Samsung skills 82
• 4.3. The comparison of Mckinsey between Huawei and Samsung 84
• 5. Huawei and Samsung technological innovation model development 86
• 5.1. Huawei technological innovation evolution 86
• 5.1.1. Imitation of innovation: 1987~1995 86
• 5.1.2. Cooperative innovation: 1995~2003 89
• 5.1.3. Independent innovation: 2003-present 91
• 5.2. Samsung technological innovation Process 95
• 5.2.1. Imitation innovation phase : 1969-1980s 95
• 5.2.2. Cooperative innovation phase：1980s-1990s 97
• 5.2.3. Independent innovation phase：from 1990s to now 99
• 5.3. Summary 102
• 6. Conclusion and suggestion 106
• 6.1. Conclusion 106
• 6.2. Suggestion 107
• 7. Reference 110