Optimization of flatbed trailer frame using the ground beam structure approach

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

An alternative lightweight flatbed trailer design is achieved through a multi-stage optimization procedure. Topology optimization is used to obtain the optimal layout of flatbed trailer frame beams that provide minimum compliance when subjected to bending loads and exhibits maximum torsional natural frequency. The ground structure approach is used to define the trailer frame layout by generating numerous beams connected to predefined points in the trailer. Topology optimization is formulated as a multi-objective problem subject to a mass constraint. Responses and sensitivities are evaluated using ANSYS, and the optimization problem is solved using the moving asymptotes method. The thicknesses, widths, and heights of the C-channel beams are optimized for further weight reduction while at least maintaining the structural performances of the original design. Size and shape optimizations are performed using OptiStruct. The new optimal design is approximately 13% (275 kg) lighter than and as stiff as the original design for bending loads. However, the former has 3.5 times higher torsional natural frequency than the latter. Moreover, the new optimal design has positive manufacturability because the channel beams will be made out of commercially available sheet metals. The same fabrication technology as for a conventional flatbed trailer is possibly to be used.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 M. Bendsøe, "Topology optimization: theory, Methods and Applications" Springer 2003

2 T. Hagishita, "Topology optimization of trusses by growing ground structure method" 37 : 377-393, 2009

3 V. Vlasov, "Thin Walled Beams" Jerusalem 1961

4 D. Carle, "The suitability of aluminium as an alternative material for car bodies" 20 : 267-272, 1999

5 K. Svanberg, "The method of moving asymptotes-a new method for structural optimization" 24 : 359-373, 1987

6 Y. Zhang, "Study on structural lightweight design of automotive front side rail based on response surface method" 129 : 553-557, 2007

7 S. Das, "Primary magnesium production costs for automotive applications" 60 : 63-69, 2008

8 J. H. Park, "Optimal design of rear chassis components for lightweight automobile using design of experiment" 41 : 391-396, 2010

9 Altair Engineering, "OptiStruct User's Guide"

10 Denghong Xiao, "Novel steel wheel design based on multi-objective topology optimization" 대한기계학회 28 (28): 1007-1016, 2014

11 C. H. Chuang, "Multidisciplinary design optimization on vehicle tailor rolled blank design" 35 : 551-560, 2008

12 F. Pan, "Metamodel-based lightweight design of B-pillar with TWB structure via support vector regression" 88 : 36-44, 2010

13 N. L. Pedersen, "Maximization of eigenvalues using topology optimization" 20 : 2-11, 2000

14 A. Lou, "Magnesium: Current and potential automotive applications" 54 : 42-48, 2002

15 T. S. Kim, "Mac-based mode-tracking in structural topology optimization" 74 : 375-383, 2000

16 G. W. Jang, "Lightweight flatbed trailer design by using topology and thickness optimization" 41 : 295-307, 2010

17 "Korea Trailer Co., Ltd"

18 S. I. Lee, "Integrated process for structural-topological configuration design of weight-reduced vehicle components" 43 : 620-629, 2007

19 J. Li, "Implementation of CAE simulation platform for lightweight automobile body design" 260-263, 2010

20 X. Huang, "Evolutionary topological optimization of vibrating continuum structures for natural frequencies" 88 : 357-364, 2010

21 X. Cui, "Design of lightweight multi-material automotive bodies using new material performance indices of thin-walled beams for the material selection with crashworthiness consideration" 32 : 815-821, 2011

22 R. Stewart, "Automotive composites offer lighter solutions" 54 : 22-28, 2010

23 R. Sullivan, "Automotive carbon fiber: Opportunities and challenges" 58 : 77-79, 2006

24 A. Kelkar, "Automobile bodies: Can aluminum be an economical alternative to steel?" 53 : 28-32, 2001

25 M. Zhou, "An integrated approach to topology, sizing, and shape optimization" 26 : 308-317, 2004

26 I. N. Fridlyander, "Aluminum alloys : Promising materials in the automotive industry" 44 : 365-370, 2002