RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Long-term Efficacy of Botulinum Neurotoxin-A Treatment for Essential Blepharospasm

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105082225

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In the present study, we investigated the treatment efficacy and clinical outcomes of botulinum neurotoxin-A (BoNT-A) administered for longer than 5 years to patients with essential blepharospasm.
      Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 19 patients (male : female = 8 : 11) diagnosed with essential blepharospasmbetween March 2006 and July 2016 who underwent BoNT-A injections for over 5 years and were followed.
      Efficacy of 297 injections of Botox (n = 162), Meditoxin (n = 75), Hugel-tox (n = 40), or Dysport (n = 20)was based on the symptom improvement score at the final injection (-1, worse; 0, same; 1, better). Injectiondose (botox unit), duration of efficacy (months), and adverse events were also investigated.
      Results: Based on product type, significant differences in patient age (59.3 ± 9.8 years), disease period (5.0 ±5.4 years), number of botulinum neurotoxin injections before visiting our clinic (1.6 ± 2.6), and follow-up period(7.2 ± 1.6 years) were not observed. Treatment efficacy score and injection dose of repetitive injections were0.1 ± 0.5 and 39.1 ± 4.0 units, respectively, and did not show significant differences with repeated injections.
      Duration of response was 5.9 ± 5.4 months, but this significantly decreased as the injections were repeated (p< 0.01). Among the 297 injections, adverse events occurred 12 times (4.0%) with no severe sequelae.
      Conclusions: In this study, we showed that repetitive, long-term BoNT-A injections are considered a stableand effective treatment for essential blepharospasm in terms of consistent injection dose and maintenanceof treatment efficacy. However, the duration of long-term efficacy could be decreased in patients injectedrepetitively.
      번역하기

      In the present study, we investigated the treatment efficacy and clinical outcomes of botulinum neurotoxin-A (BoNT-A) administered for longer than 5 years to patients with essential blepharospasm. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 19 patients (male...

      In the present study, we investigated the treatment efficacy and clinical outcomes of botulinum neurotoxin-A (BoNT-A) administered for longer than 5 years to patients with essential blepharospasm.
      Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 19 patients (male : female = 8 : 11) diagnosed with essential blepharospasmbetween March 2006 and July 2016 who underwent BoNT-A injections for over 5 years and were followed.
      Efficacy of 297 injections of Botox (n = 162), Meditoxin (n = 75), Hugel-tox (n = 40), or Dysport (n = 20)was based on the symptom improvement score at the final injection (-1, worse; 0, same; 1, better). Injectiondose (botox unit), duration of efficacy (months), and adverse events were also investigated.
      Results: Based on product type, significant differences in patient age (59.3 ± 9.8 years), disease period (5.0 ±5.4 years), number of botulinum neurotoxin injections before visiting our clinic (1.6 ± 2.6), and follow-up period(7.2 ± 1.6 years) were not observed. Treatment efficacy score and injection dose of repetitive injections were0.1 ± 0.5 and 39.1 ± 4.0 units, respectively, and did not show significant differences with repeated injections.
      Duration of response was 5.9 ± 5.4 months, but this significantly decreased as the injections were repeated (p< 0.01). Among the 297 injections, adverse events occurred 12 times (4.0%) with no severe sequelae.
      Conclusions: In this study, we showed that repetitive, long-term BoNT-A injections are considered a stableand effective treatment for essential blepharospasm in terms of consistent injection dose and maintenanceof treatment efficacy. However, the duration of long-term efficacy could be decreased in patients injectedrepetitively.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 신재호, "본태눈꺼풀연축 환자에서 디스포트와 보톡스 효과 비교" 대한안과학회 50 (50): 331-335, 2009

      2 Naumann M, "Safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin type A following long-term use" 13 (13): 35-40, 2006

      3 Ramirez-Castaneda J, "Long-term efficacy, safety, and side effect profile of botulinum toxin in dystonia: a 20-year follow-up" 90 : 344-348, 2014

      4 Ababneh OH, "Long-term efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin A injections to treat blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm" 42 : 254-261, 2014

      5 Czyz CN, "Long-term botulinum toxin treatment of benign essential blepharospasm, hemifacial spasm, and Meige syndrome" 156 : 173-177, 2013

      6 윤진숙, "Double-Blind, Randomized, Comparative Study of Meditoxin® Versus Botox® in the Treatment of Essential Blepharospasm" 대한안과학회 23 (23): 137-141, 2009

      7 Sampaio C, "DYSBOT: a single-blind, randomized parallel study to determine whether any differences can be detected in the efficacy and tolerability of two formulations of botulinum toxin type A (Dysport a nd Botox) a ssuming a ratio o f 4:1" 12 : 1013-1018, 1997

      8 성영제, "Clinical Outcomes of Individualized Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A Injection Techniques in Patients with Essential Blepharospasm" 대한안과학회 29 (29): 115-120, 2015

      9 Kenney C, "Botulinum toxin in the treatment of blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm" 115 : 585-591, 2008

      10 Dutton JJ, "Botulinum toxin in ophthalmology" 52 : 13-31, 2007

      1 신재호, "본태눈꺼풀연축 환자에서 디스포트와 보톡스 효과 비교" 대한안과학회 50 (50): 331-335, 2009

      2 Naumann M, "Safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin type A following long-term use" 13 (13): 35-40, 2006

      3 Ramirez-Castaneda J, "Long-term efficacy, safety, and side effect profile of botulinum toxin in dystonia: a 20-year follow-up" 90 : 344-348, 2014

      4 Ababneh OH, "Long-term efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin A injections to treat blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm" 42 : 254-261, 2014

      5 Czyz CN, "Long-term botulinum toxin treatment of benign essential blepharospasm, hemifacial spasm, and Meige syndrome" 156 : 173-177, 2013

      6 윤진숙, "Double-Blind, Randomized, Comparative Study of Meditoxin® Versus Botox® in the Treatment of Essential Blepharospasm" 대한안과학회 23 (23): 137-141, 2009

      7 Sampaio C, "DYSBOT: a single-blind, randomized parallel study to determine whether any differences can be detected in the efficacy and tolerability of two formulations of botulinum toxin type A (Dysport a nd Botox) a ssuming a ratio o f 4:1" 12 : 1013-1018, 1997

      8 성영제, "Clinical Outcomes of Individualized Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A Injection Techniques in Patients with Essential Blepharospasm" 대한안과학회 29 (29): 115-120, 2015

      9 Kenney C, "Botulinum toxin in the treatment of blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm" 115 : 585-591, 2008

      10 Dutton JJ, "Botulinum toxin in ophthalmology" 52 : 13-31, 2007

      11 Scott AB, "Botulinum A toxin injection as a treatment for blepharospasm" 103 : 347-350, 1985

      12 Pagan FL, "A guide to dosing in the treatment of cervical dystonia and blepharospasm with Xeomin: a new botulinum neurotoxin A" 18 : 441-445, 2012

      13 Rieder CR, "A double-blind, randomized, crossover study of prosigne versus botox in patients with blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm" 30 : 39-42, 2007

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.11 0.11 0.12
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.1 0.13 0.482 0.03
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼