변혁적 리더십과 거래적 리더십이 부하들의 정서적 몰입과 규범적 몰입에 미치는 영향 : 부하의 자기조절초점 특성의 조절효과 = Effects of Transactional and Transformational Leadership on affective commitment and normative commitment : The Moderating Effect of Subordinate Regulatory Focus

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of transformational and transactional leadership on subordinates' affective and normative commitment respectively, and to identify the moderating effect of subordinates' regulatory focus on these relationships. To do so, we surveyed 300 employees, and 298 responses were used for the final analysis excluding two insincere responses. The analysis showed that both transformational and transactional leadership had a positive effect on affective and normative commitment. Next, we tested the moderating effect of regulatory focus as the subordinate characteristic, and found that, first, promotion focus moderated the effect of transformational leadership on subordinates' affective and normative commitment, and that the effect of transformational leadership on subordinates' affective and normative commitment was stronger when subordinates' promotion focus was high. Next, the prevention focus moderated the effect of transactional leadership on subordinates' affective and normative commitment, and that the effect of transformational leadership on subordinates' affective and normative commitment was stronger when subordinates' prevention focus was high. Finally, we discuss the theoretical and practical implications, limitations, and future research based on the results of this study.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구의 목적은 변혁적 리더십과 거래적 리더십 각각이 부하들의 정서적 몰입과 규범적 몰입에 미치는 영향을 확인하고 이러한 관계에서 부하 조절초점의 조절효과를 밝히는 데 있다. 이를 위해 직장인 300명을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였으며, 이중 불성실한 응답자 2명을 제외한 최종 298명을 대상으로 분석을 실시하였다. 분석 결과, 변혁적, 거래적 리더십은 모두 정서적, 규범적 몰입에 정적인 영향력을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 다음으로 부하 특성으로 조절초점의 조절효과를 검증한 결과, 향상초점은 변혁적 리더십이 부하들의 정서적, 규범적 몰입에 미치는 영향력을 조절하는 것으로 나타났으며, 부하들의 향상초점이 높을 경우 변혁적 리더십이 부하들의 정서적, 규범적 몰입에 미치는 영향력은 더욱 강해지는 것으로 나타났다. 다음으로 예방초점은 거래적 리더십이 부하들의 정서적, 규범적 몰입에 미치는 영향력을 조절하는 것으로 나타났으며, 부하들의 예방초점이 높을 경우 거래적 리더십이 부하들의 정서적, 규범적 몰입에 미치는 영향력은 더욱 강해지는 것으로 나타났다. 마지막으로 본 연구가 의미하는 시사점과 향후 연구 방향에 대해서 제시하였다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이기태 ; 이남겸 ; 황일영 ; 송준화 ; 이수욱, "상사의 변혁적 리더십이 구성원의 조직몰입과 이직의도에 미치는 영향" KNU 기업경영연구소 9 (9): 167-186, 2018

2 신승인 ; 김찬중, "상사신뢰, 정서적 몰입, 직무성과의 관계: 진성리더십의 역할" KNU 기업경영연구소 12 (12): 83-103, 2021

3 이남겸 ; 황일영 ; 이수욱, "사회적기업 경영자의 변혁적 리더십이 구성원의 조직몰입에 미치는 영향 : 대구지역 사회적기업을 대상으로" 사회혁신기업연구원 6 (6): 45-59, 2021

4 왕단 ; 정수진, "목표지향성과 혁신행동 간의 관계: 피드백 추구행동의 매개효과와 변혁적 리더십의 조절효과" 사회혁신기업연구원 6 (6): 81-102, 2021

5 Bass, B. M., "Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership" 8 (8): 9-32, 1999

6 Walumbwa, F. O., "Transformational leadership, organizational commitment, and job satisfaction : A comparative study of Kenyan and US financial firms" 16 (16): 235-256, 2005

7 Avolio, B. J., "Transformational leadership and organizational commitment : Mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior : The International Journal of Industrial" 25 (25): 951-968, 2004

8 Bass, B. M., "Transformational leadership" Erlbaum 2005

9 Judge, T. A., "Transformational and transactional leadership : a meta-analytic test of their relative validity" 89 (89): 755-768, 2004

10 Jung, D. I., "The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings" 14 (14): 525-544, 2003

11 Epitropaki, O., "The moderating role of individual differences in the relation between transformational/transactional leadership perceptions and organizational identification" 16 (16): 569-589, 2005

12 Mowday, R. T., "The measurement of organizational commitment" 14 (14): 224-247, 1979

13 Xu, G., "The impact of transformational leadership style on organizational performance: The intermediary effects of leader-member exchange"

14 Erkutlu, H., "The impact of transformational leadership on organizational and leadership effectiveness" 27 (27): 708-726, 2008

15 Jones, G. R., "The experience and evolution of trust : Implications for cooperation and teamwork" 23 (23): 531-546, 1998

16 Van Dierendonck, D., "Same difference? Exploring the differential mechanisms linking servant leadership and transformational leadership to follower outcomes" 25 (25): 544-562, 2014

17 Graen, G. B., "Relationship-based approach to leadership : Development of leader-member exchange(LMX)theory of leadership over 25 years : Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective" 6 (6): 219-247, 1995

18 Righetti, F., "Regulatory focus and the Michelangelo Phenomenon : How close partners promote one another's ideal selves" 46 (46): 972-985, 2010

19 Yi, S., "Regulatory focus and message framing : A test of three accounts" 33 (33): 435-443, 2009

20 Joo, B. K., "Psychological empowerment and organizational commitment : the moderating effect of organizational learning culture" 13 (13): 425-441, 2010

21 Ehrhart, M. G., "Predicting followers' preferences for charismatic leadership : The influence of follower values and personality" 12 (12): 153-179, 2001

22 Van Vianen, A. E., "Person–organization and person–supervisor fits : Employee commitments in a Chinese context" 32 (32): 906-926, 2011

23 Shah, J., "Performance incentives and means : how regulatory focus influences goal attainment" 74 (74): 285-293, 1998

24 Zhang, J. C., "Organizational commitment, work engagement, person–supervisor fit, and turnover intention : A total effect moderation model" 43 (43): 1657-1666, 2015

25 Dunham, R. B., "Organizational commitment : The utility of an integrative definition" 79 (79): 370-380, 1994

26 Al-Jabari, B., "Organizational Commitment : A Review of the Conceptual and Empirical Literature and a Research Agenda" 11 (11): 78-119, 2019

27 Meyer, J. P., "Normative commitment in the workplace : A theoretical analysis and re-conceptualization" 20 (20): 283-294, 2010

28 Bass, B. M., "Multifactor leadership questionnaire-short form 6S" Center for Leadership Studies 1992

29 Kark, R., "Motivation to lead motivation to follow : The role of self-regulatory focus in leadership processes" 32 (32): 500-528, 2007

30 Lockwood, P., "Motivation by positive or negative role models : Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us" 83 (83): 854-864, 2002

31 Spector, P. E., "Method variance in organizational research : truth or urban legend" 9 (9): 221-232, 2006

32 Guzman, F. A., "Leader–subordinate congruence in power distance values and voice behaviour : A person–supervisor fit approach" 71 (71): 271-295, 2022

33 Jackson, T. A., "Leadership, commitment, and culture : A meta-analysis" 20 (20): 84-106, 2013

34 Yahaya, R., "Leadership styles and organizational commitment : literature review" 35 (35): 190-216, 2016

35 Kark, R., "Keep your head in the clouds and your feet on the ground : a multifocal review of leadership–followership self-regulatory focus" 13 (13): 509-546, 2019

36 Riaz, T., "Impact of transformational leadership style on affective employees' commitment : An empirical study of banking sector in Islamabad(Pakistan)" 3 (3): 43-51, 2011

37 Bass, B. M., "Full range leadership development: Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire" Mindgarden 1997

38 Hamstra, M. R., "Followers feel valued—When leaders' regulatory focus makes leaders exhibit behavior that fits followers' regulatory focus" 51 : 34-40, 2014

39 Halvorson, H. G., "Focus: Use different ways of seeing the world for success and influence" Hudson Street Press 2013

40 Santelli, A. G., "Fit to forgive : Exploring the interaction between regulatory focus, repentance, and forgiveness" 96 (96): 381-394, 2009

41 Lee, J, "Effects of leadership and leader-member exchange on commitment" 26 (26): 655-672, 2005

42 Enwereuzor, I. K., "Dynamics of person-supervisor fit in relationship quality and well-being of university academicians" 50 (50): 1356-1371, 2021

43 Halvorson, H. G., "Do you play to win--or to not lose" 91 (91): 117-120, 2013

44 Levine, J. M., "Development of strategic norms in groups" 82 (82): 88-101, 2000

45 Oc, B., "Contextual leadership : A systematic review of how contextual factors shape leadership and its outcomes" 29 (29): 218-235, 2018

46 Meyer, J. P., "Commitment in organizations" Routledge 2012

47 Myers, R. H., "Classical and modern regression with applications (Vol. 2)" Duxbury press 1990

48 DiRenzo, M. S., "Called to serve : exploring the relationship between career calling, career plateaus, and organizational commitment in the US Military" 30 (30): 60-77, 2022

49 Higgins, E. T., "Beyond pleasure and pain" 52 (52): 1280-1300, 1997

50 Wexley, K. N., "Attitudinal congruence and similarity as related to interpersonal evaluations in manager-subordinate dyads" 23 (23): 320-330, 1980

51 Gerbing, D. W., "An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment" 25 (25): 186-192, 1988

52 Meyer, J. P., "Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization : A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences" 61 (61): 20-52, 2002

53 Lord, R. G., "A test of leadership categorization theory : Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions" 34 (34): 343-378, 1984

54 Mathieu, J. E., "A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment" 108 (108): 171-194, 1990