RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      변호인과 양형: 살인 사건에 있어 국선 변호인과 사선 변호인의 역할과 영향 분석 = Attorneys and Sentencing: The Effect of Defense Counsel on Homicide Offenses

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105337037

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this study is to identify the sentencing factors that vary according to the type of counsel, based on the previous study that the sentence deviation occurs according to the type of counsel. To this end, information on attorneys, prosecu...

      The purpose of this study is to identify the sentencing factors that vary according to the type of counsel, based on the previous study that the sentence deviation occurs according to the type of counsel. To this end, information on attorneys, prosecutors, and judges in charge of information of cases about 1421 incidents in the first instance of murder and attempted murder were used, As a result of the multiple regression analysis for the cases of the private attorneys, attorney’s career, prosecutor’s career and victim information showed the significant effect on the length of sentence. In contrast, the cases of the public attorneys, offender’s information(age) had a significant influence.
      This result revealed that jungwanyeoo(revolving door attorneys) and power of connection of the courtroom players were not a main factor on sentencing result on homicide offense. Lawyer’s information is only related to the cases which were handed by private attorneys. In case of the homicide cases handed by public attorney, the result was influenced by only the offender’s information. More detailed findings and policy implication will be discussed in the main text.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이지은, "판사와 변호인 간 사회적 자본이 판결에 미치는 영향 연구" 한국형사정책학회 26 (26): 135-162, 2014

      2 박미랑, "양형기준 밖의 양형요인으로서 법조인 연구: 살인범죄군을 중심으로" 한국경찰연구학회 17 (17): 101-130, 2018

      3 박미랑, "살인 범죄 양형 편차, 누구의 영향력인가?: 사건 당사자와 법정행위자 집단, 그리고 법원조직 특성의 영향력 비교" 대검찰청 (55) : 238-282, 2017

      4 박미랑, "법원 조직 특성에 따른 정의? - 살인미수 양형선고에 있어서 법원 조직 특성의 영향력 연구 -" 대한범죄학회 11 (11): 169-198, 2017

      5 Champion, D., "private counsels and public defenders : A look at weak cases, prior records, and leniency in plea bargaining" 17 : 253-263, 1989

      6 Cohen, T., "Whois better at defending criminals? Does type of defense attorney matter in terms of producing favorable case outcomes" 25 (25): 29-58, 2014

      7 Levin, M., "Urban politics and the criminal courts" University of Chicago Press 1977

      8 Johnson, B., "The multilevel context of criminal sentencing: Integrating judge-and country-level influences" 44 : 259-298, 2006

      9 Choi, Hansoo, "Revolving Door Attorneys and the Power of Connections: Evidence from Korea"

      10 Feeney F., "Public defenders, assigned counsel, retained counsel: Does type of criminal defense counsel matter?" 22 : 361-456, 1990

      1 이지은, "판사와 변호인 간 사회적 자본이 판결에 미치는 영향 연구" 한국형사정책학회 26 (26): 135-162, 2014

      2 박미랑, "양형기준 밖의 양형요인으로서 법조인 연구: 살인범죄군을 중심으로" 한국경찰연구학회 17 (17): 101-130, 2018

      3 박미랑, "살인 범죄 양형 편차, 누구의 영향력인가?: 사건 당사자와 법정행위자 집단, 그리고 법원조직 특성의 영향력 비교" 대검찰청 (55) : 238-282, 2017

      4 박미랑, "법원 조직 특성에 따른 정의? - 살인미수 양형선고에 있어서 법원 조직 특성의 영향력 연구 -" 대한범죄학회 11 (11): 169-198, 2017

      5 Champion, D., "private counsels and public defenders : A look at weak cases, prior records, and leniency in plea bargaining" 17 : 253-263, 1989

      6 Cohen, T., "Whois better at defending criminals? Does type of defense attorney matter in terms of producing favorable case outcomes" 25 (25): 29-58, 2014

      7 Levin, M., "Urban politics and the criminal courts" University of Chicago Press 1977

      8 Johnson, B., "The multilevel context of criminal sentencing: Integrating judge-and country-level influences" 44 : 259-298, 2006

      9 Choi, Hansoo, "Revolving Door Attorneys and the Power of Connections: Evidence from Korea"

      10 Feeney F., "Public defenders, assigned counsel, retained counsel: Does type of criminal defense counsel matter?" 22 : 361-456, 1990

      11 Kanter, R., "Men and Women of the Cooperation" Basic Books 1977

      12 Oaks, D., "Lawyers for the poor, In the scales of justice" Aldine 1970

      13 Hanson, R., "Indigent defenders: get the job done and done well. submitted state justice institute by nation center for state courts"

      14 Shierholz, H., "Free of charge: The take-up and consequences of indigent criminal defense services"

      15 Choi, Hansoo, "ESSAYS ON BUSINESS GROUPS AND THE JUDICIARY IN SOUTH KOREA" University of Pittsburgh 2014

      16 Huang, K., "Does the type of criminal defense counsel affect case outcome? :A natural experiment in Taiwan" 30 : 113-127, 2010

      17 Johnson, J, "Does repeat play elicit cooperation? Evidence from federal civil litigation" 31 : 39-60, 2002

      18 Hartely, R., "Do you get what you pay for? type of counsel and its effect on criminal court outcomes" 38 (38): 1063-1070, 2010

      19 King, R., "Demography of the legal profession and racial disparities in sentencing" 44 (44): 1-32, 2010

      20 Harlow, C. W., "Defense counsel in criminal cases (NCJ179023)"

      21 Haynes, H., "Courtroom workgroups and sentencing: the effect of similarity, proximity, and stability" 56 : 26-161, 2010

      22 Ulmer, J., "Court communities under sentencing guidelines : Dilemmas of Formal Rationality and sentencing Disparity" 34 : 399-, 1996

      23 Wice, P., "Chaos in the courtroom : The inner workings of the urban municipal courts" Prager 1985

      24 Colvin, A., "An empirical study of employment arbitration : cases and outcomes and processes" 8 : 1-23, 2011

      25 Casper, J., "American Criminal Justice: The defendant’s perspective" Prentice Hall 1972

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.24 1.24 1.14
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.09 0.97 1.211 0.55
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼