RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      <윌리엄 셰익스피어의 로미오+줄리엣>의 미디어와 소비문화 = Media and Consumer Culture in Baz Luhrmann’s William Shakespeare’s Romeo+Juliet

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103994263

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Baz Luhrmann’s radical film William Shakespeare’s Romeo+Juliet (1996) offers a stunning contemporary vision of Shakespearean play text. Luhrmann uses a variety of media forms and images from consumer culture to create very popular filmic productio...

      Baz Luhrmann’s radical film William Shakespeare’s Romeo+Juliet (1996) offers a stunning contemporary vision of Shakespearean play text. Luhrmann uses a variety of media forms and images from consumer culture to create very popular filmic productions, addressed to an up-to-date modern mass audience.
      William Shakespeare’s Romeo+Juliet seems like a good example of post-modern pastiche, which puts together a plethora of allusions, copies, and intertextuality (the western movie, the gangster movie, the kung-fu pic, the urban thriller, crime-thriller, the action comedy, MTV, etc). He borrows the characteristics of many genres and styles and re-works these elements through his signature “Bazmark” style to make postmodern pastiche, in which the distinction between high and low art is collapsed and everything has equal value.
      In Luhrmann’s film, Shakespeare’s language becomes the source of advertising copy and a brand name. And the film, where sacred and profane exist in a dynamic balance, is so saturated with religious symbolism, that is intimately mingled with consumer culture. The mockery of a religion plays a clashing role in Luhrmann’s mise-en-scène, for the giant statues of Christ, Mary, and various saints compose a powerless group of silent onlookers to the violence in Verona, and for the film portrays religion as a media icon or a brand name or a just another commodity in post-modern consumer culture.
      To mix popular culture with elements of high culture, Luhrmann opens his film with a television news report that functions as the classical chorus, followed by the hasty progression of newspaper headlines concerning the “new mutiny” and “ancient grudge” between Capulets and Montagues. But Jean Baudrillard claimed that everything today is composed of simulacra of previously existing things. According to Baudrillard’s theory, the news on television is the hyperreal, though it seems to refer to something real; the news is a simulation designed to hold the attention of the viewer. In the circular frame where everything begins and ends with television news, the whole tragedy of Romeo and Juliet is presented as an event within the TV news.
      Luhrmann’s film can be read as a canonical example of iconoclasm, for it challenges to the Shakespearean canon and timeless, eternal values he represents. Though Luhrmann may try to make Shakespeare relevant to today’s society from a new contemporary innovative viewpoint, the practice of this film consequently seems to cast a doubt on Shakespearean icon of literary value and to destabilize the previously unshakeable stability of his authority. Luhrmann’s flamboyant cinematographic style, “Bazmark,” has positioned him as an innovative, creative auteur competing with High Culture Shakespeare within the domain of contemporary cultural milieu.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Baz Luhrmann’s radical film William Shakespeare’s Romeo+Juliet (1996) offers a stunning contemporary vision of Shakespearean play text. Luhrmann uses a variety of media forms and images from consumer culture to create very popular filmic productio...

      Baz Luhrmann’s radical film William Shakespeare’s Romeo+Juliet (1996) offers a stunning contemporary vision of Shakespearean play text. Luhrmann uses a variety of media forms and images from consumer culture to create very popular filmic productions, addressed t o an up-to-date modern mass audience.William Shakespeare’s Romeo+Juliet seems like a good example of post-modern pastiche, which puts together a plethora of allusions, copies, and intertextuality (the western movie, the gangster movie, the kung-fu pic, the urban thriller, crime-thriller, the action comedy, MTV, etc). He borrows the characteristics of many genres and styles and re-works these elements through his signature “Bazmark” style to make postmodern pastiche, in which the distinction between high and low art is collapsed and everything has equal value.
      In Luhrmann’s film, Shakespeare’s language becomes the source of advertising copy and a brand name. And the film, where sacred and profane exist in a dynamic balance, is so saturated with religious symbolism, that is intimately mingled with consumer culture. The mockery of a religion plays a clashing role in Luhrmann’s mise-en-scène, for the giant statues of Christ, Mary, and various saints compose a powerless group of silent onlookers to the violence in Verona, and for the film portrays religion as a media icon or a brand name or a just another commodity in post-modern consumer culture.
      To mix popular culture with elements of high culture, Luhrmann opens his film with a television news report that functions as the classical chorus, followed by the hasty progression of newspaper headlines concerning the “new mutiny” and “ancient grudge” between Capulets and Montagues. But Jean Baudrillard claimed that everything today is composed of simulacra of previously existing things. According to Baudrillard’s theory, the news on television is the hyperreal, though it seems to refer to something real; the news is a simulation designed to hold the attention of the viewer. In the circular frame where everything begins and ends with television news, the whole tragedy of Romeo and Juliet is presented as an event within the TV news.
      Luhrmann’s film can be read as a canonical example of iconoclasm, for it challenges to the Shakespearean canon and timeless, eternal values he represents. Though Luhrmann may try to make Shakespeare relevant to today’s society from a new contemporary innovative viewpoint, the practice of this film consequently seems to cast a doubt on Shakespearean icon of literary value and to destabilize the previously unshakeable stability of his authority. Luhrmann’s flamboyant cinematographic style, “Bazmark,” has positioned him as an innovative, creative auteur competing with High Culture Shakespeare within the domain of contemporary cultural milieu.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Maslin, Janet, "William Shakespeare’s Romeo+and Juliet Review"

      2 Luhrmann, Baz, dir, "William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet"

      3 Matthews, Peter, "William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet" 7 (7): 54-55, 1997

      4 Phillips, John, "To be or not to be Postmodern: Shakespeare and Postmodernism"

      5 Rutter, Carol Chillington, "The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film" Cambridge UP 241-260, 2000

      6 Hindle, Maurice, "Studying Shakespeare On Film" Palgrave Macmillan 2007

      7 Debord Guy, "Society of the Spectacle" Zone Books 1994

      8 Coursen, Herbert R, "Shakespeare: The Two Traditions" AUP 1999

      9 Anderegg, Michael, "Shakespeare, The Movie, II: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV, Video, and DVD" Routledge 56-71, 2003

      10 Loehlin, James N, "Shakespeare, Film, Fin de Siècle" St. Martin’s 121-136, 2000

      1 Maslin, Janet, "William Shakespeare’s Romeo+and Juliet Review"

      2 Luhrmann, Baz, dir, "William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet"

      3 Matthews, Peter, "William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet" 7 (7): 54-55, 1997

      4 Phillips, John, "To be or not to be Postmodern: Shakespeare and Postmodernism"

      5 Rutter, Carol Chillington, "The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film" Cambridge UP 241-260, 2000

      6 Hindle, Maurice, "Studying Shakespeare On Film" Palgrave Macmillan 2007

      7 Debord Guy, "Society of the Spectacle" Zone Books 1994

      8 Coursen, Herbert R, "Shakespeare: The Two Traditions" AUP 1999

      9 Anderegg, Michael, "Shakespeare, The Movie, II: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV, Video, and DVD" Routledge 56-71, 2003

      10 Loehlin, James N, "Shakespeare, Film, Fin de Siècle" St. Martin’s 121-136, 2000

      11 Buchanan, Judith, "Shakespeare on Film. Essex" Pearson Education 2005

      12 Donaldson, Peter S, "Shakespeare after Mass Media" Palgrave 59-82, 2002

      13 Baudrillard, Jean, "Selected Writings" Polity 1988

      14 Hodgdon, Barbara, "Romeo and Juliet" Palgrave 126-146, 2001

      15 Cartmell, Deborah, "Reading and Screening Ophelia: 1948-1966" 8 : 28-41, 1997

      16 Walker, Elsie, "Pop Goes the Shakespeare: Baz Luhrmann’s William Shakespeare’s Romeo+Juliet" 28 (28): 132-139, 2000

      17 Arroyo, José, "Kiss Kiss Bang Bang" 7 (7): 6-9, 1997

      18 Featherstone, Mike, "Consumer Culture and Postmodernism" Sage 1991

      19 Hamilton, Lucy, "Baz vs. The Bardolaters, Or Why William Shakespeare’s Romeo+Juliet Deserves Another Look" 28 (28): 118-124, 2000

      20 Walker, Elsie, "A ‘Harsh World’ of Soundbite Shakespeare: Michael Almereyda’s Hamlet (2000)"

      21 Rothwell, Kenneth S, "A History of Shakespeare on Screen: A Century of Film and Television" Cambridge UP 1999

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2018 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-04-24 학회명변경 한글명 : 고전 르네상스 영문학회 -> 한국 고전 르네상스 영문학회 KCI등재
      2006-07-03 학회명변경 한글명 : 고전 르네상스영문학회 -> 고전 르네상스 영문학회 KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.22 0.22 0.22
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.19 0.15 1.112 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼