RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      Anti-Competitive Practices as Trade Barriers Used by Korea and Japan  :  Focusing on Intellectual Property Market

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60208714

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study shows that the anti-competitive practices as trade barriers in intellectual property market of the two countries have almost identical characteristics as shown in the study that the author made about their service market and somewhat differ...

      This study shows that the anti-competitive practices as trade barriers in intellectual property market of the two countries have almost identical characteristics as shown in the study that the author made about their service market and somewhat different from their commodity market which revealed that there were substantial differences between the anti-competitive practices of the two countries market. Considering the overall intellectual property-related situations of the two countries, even though the governments of both countries have systematically and legally tried to achieve the international standards in regulating intellectual property market, particularly under pressure from their trade partner countries, it will take substantial time to eliminate the real gap between both countries' policy objectives and those required by the TRIPS or their trade partners. The similarity of the anti-competitive practices in intellectual property market between the two countries could not be illustrated as, so called, the significant difference in the level of over-all development between the two countries. These analytical results imply that such social/cultural aspects of the intellectual property market should be treated differently from the controversial aspects in the TRIPS mechanism between the developed and the developing countries. This study is limited by the fact that the anti-competitive practices of both countries have been comparatively reviewed from the viewpoint of international trade norms or competition norms that have only been discussed but not yet established, without consideration of other external factors, which is expected to be followed by an interdisciplinary analysis of the anti-competitive practices of the two countries' intellectual property market.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. Introduction
      • Ⅱ. International Regulation
      • Ⅲ. Korean Mark
      • Ⅳ. Japanese Market
      • Ⅴ. Review
      • Ⅰ. Introduction
      • Ⅱ. International Regulation
      • Ⅲ. Korean Mark
      • Ⅳ. Japanese Market
      • Ⅴ. Review
      • Ⅵ. Concluding Remarks
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼