곤륜(昆侖) 최창대(崔昌大)의 문장론 연구 = A study about Gollyun(昆侖) Choe, Changdae(崔昌大)’s prose theory

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper examines the literary theory of Gollyun(昆侖) Choe, Changdae(崔昌大, 1669-1720). He has authored a variety of works, and his works have been recognized in many literatures. Because of this, studying his literature is a meaningful.
The theory of poem creation is as follows. It is the basic poem creationism that expresses the feelings that I experienced and felt as it is. The utility is to multiply and control the artist's feelings through his poem. However, the creative theory of being the best writer is different from this. It must be premised on finding from the heart and studying various books. If these qualities was provided, the words are clear and the meaning is condensed. He distinguished between general works and the best works, and presented their own creative theory and discussed their utility.
The theory of prose utility is as follows. He emphasizes the importance of communicating with contemporaries and establishing important things of the day and making them easier to understand, without specifying the morality. This is a thoroughly realistic utility theory.
In the classical chinese prose’s history, 'Sadal(辭達)' and 'Susa(修辭)' were issues. He transcends the recognition of 'Sadal(辭達)' and 'Susa(修辭)' as zero-sum. In addition, he gives priority to the meaning of the writer and emphasizes self-realization, which is in common with other political soron(少論) writers' theories.
When creating prose, simplicity and bizarreness were issues. He emphasizes concise writing. However, it can be realized when a writer with high opinion is aware of the reason and raises the core. Through various sources, he has completely rejected Ming(明) dynasty’s former and latter seven master(前後七子). However, he did not exclude their work unilaterally, and recognized the work of Chin-Han dynasty(秦漢) and Dang-Song dynasty(唐宋). This is the same as his father Choiseokjung(崔錫鼎). He recognized Chin-Han dynasty(秦漢) and Dang-Song dynasty(唐宋) equally, and sought a simplified and summarized style.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 송혁기, "老․少 分岐期의 學的 地形과 南九萬 계열 소론계의 문학비평" 고전문학한문학연구학회 10 : 181-210, 2011

2 "한국고전종합DB"

3 "조선왕조실록"

4 김기엽, "조선 후기 문인들의 辭達에 대한 해석과 문학론적 수용 양상" 한국고전번역원 50 : 301-340, 2017

5 권진옥, "명곡(明谷) 최석정(崔錫鼎)의 논설류 산문 연구" 동양고전학회 (70) : 91-117, 2018

6 권진옥, "명곡(明谷) 최석정(崔錫鼎)의 기문(記文) 연구" 동아시아고대학회 (49) : 43-66, 2018

7 윤재환, "명곡 최석정 상소문 연구 - 因宋婺源疏辨誣辭職仍陳先祖事蹟疏를 중심으로 -" 한국문학과예술연구소 (27) : 115-146, 2018

8 성범중, "곤륜(昆侖) 최창대(崔昌大)의 삶과 시세계" 한국한시학회 14 : 5-40, 2010

9 李德壽, "頭陀草" 민족문화추진회 1997

10 申維翰, "靑泉集" 민족문화추진회 1997

11 李夏坤, "西堂私載" 민족문화추진회 1997

12 崔錫鼎, "明谷集" 민족문화추진회 1995

13 崔昌大, "昆侖集" 민족문화추진회 1997

14 金英珠, "昆侖 崔昌大의 修辭論 硏究" 동방한문학회 24 : 115-140, 2003