RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      염철론』(鹽鐵論) 수사학적 분석 = Rhetorical Analysis of “Yantielun”

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108769794

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study examined to understand at the Pre Han Dynasty in China, that between the court officials and the civilian intellectuals argued in the discussions by using a rhetorical methodology whether or not to abolish the iron and steel monopoly. First of all, with a brief introduction to “Yantielun”, and the cause of this discussion was examined by looking at the situation of China at the time. In addition, various rhetorical arguments and strategies of persuasion were examined which used to carry through their arguments by the best intellectuals at that time. They developed their arguments with the rhetorical methods and the way of persuading strategy. To give authority and a sense of stability to their claimss, they quoted the words of old sages and used metaphors and analogies to emphasize what they argued. In addition, I was able to understand the responsibilities and roles of the state and the people in the pre-Han period, and also could look back on the current situation.
      번역하기

      This study examined to understand at the Pre Han Dynasty in China, that between the court officials and the civilian intellectuals argued in the discussions by using a rhetorical methodology whether or not to abolish the iron and steel monopoly. First...

      This study examined to understand at the Pre Han Dynasty in China, that between the court officials and the civilian intellectuals argued in the discussions by using a rhetorical methodology whether or not to abolish the iron and steel monopoly. First of all, with a brief introduction to “Yantielun”, and the cause of this discussion was examined by looking at the situation of China at the time. In addition, various rhetorical arguments and strategies of persuasion were examined which used to carry through their arguments by the best intellectuals at that time. They developed their arguments with the rhetorical methods and the way of persuading strategy. To give authority and a sense of stability to their claimss, they quoted the words of old sages and used metaphors and analogies to emphasize what they argued. In addition, I was able to understand the responsibilities and roles of the state and the people in the pre-Han period, and also could look back on the current situation.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼