RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      신라 村落帳籍 연구의 쟁점 = Major Issues in the Research of the Shilla Village Register

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A45050542

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      It is encouraging to see that primary historical sources have been considered once again to be of utmost significance for the study of ancient history of Korea in recent years. Among the ancient historical documents, the most often and widely utilized case in the study of ancient history of Korea is the so-called "Shilla Village Documents". This paper aims to review previous studies of these important documents and to discuss the current disputed issues in their research.
      Full-scale study of the Shilla Village Documents did not begin in earnest until the 1950s. and it was in the 1990s that we were able to witness the development of serious scholarly discussion of these documents. However, the differences in the interpretation of these documents appear to have widened, rather than narrowed, with an increasing number of studies. This situation suggests that it is an urgent necessity for the concerned scholars to reflect upon their methodologies and to try hard to search for new approaches.
      Some of the most disputed issues in the research of the Shilla Village Documents can be summarized as follows: (1) the proper appellation of the documents, (2) the deciphering of some of the disputed characters, (3) the dating of the documents, (4) the nature of the documents, (5) the consisting elements of gongyeon 孔烟, (6) the organization criteria of the nine-tiered household system, (7) the function of gyeyeon 計烟, (8) the meaning of the land records, (9) other issues such as the exact location of the village, the relation between the commandery-county system and the Village Documents, the interpretation of the records of horses and cattle, and so on.
      In this paper, three suggestions are made in order to find a way to construct new methodologies for the study of these documents. First, for most of the studies which are conducted from the comparative historical perspectives, it is necessary to explain explicitly how and why such a comparative research is conducted and what is being compared. In this process, it is essential to carry out a more substantial discussion of the internal conditions of the Shilla Kingdom. Second, it is necessary to review the methodologies of economic historical researches, which are carried out with very few reference to the related studies of other research areas. It is essential to understand the economic factors in relation to the period in question, the society itself, and the diverse human populations at the time. Third, as seen in the interpretation of disputed characters of the documents and the confusion of various terminologies, it is urgent to draw a consensus on the most basic and important facts of the documents.
      번역하기

      It is encouraging to see that primary historical sources have been considered once again to be of utmost significance for the study of ancient history of Korea in recent years. Among the ancient historical documents, the most often and widely utilized...

      It is encouraging to see that primary historical sources have been considered once again to be of utmost significance for the study of ancient history of Korea in recent years. Among the ancient historical documents, the most often and widely utilized case in the study of ancient history of Korea is the so-called "Shilla Village Documents". This paper aims to review previous studies of these important documents and to discuss the current disputed issues in their research.
      Full-scale study of the Shilla Village Documents did not begin in earnest until the 1950s. and it was in the 1990s that we were able to witness the development of serious scholarly discussion of these documents. However, the differences in the interpretation of these documents appear to have widened, rather than narrowed, with an increasing number of studies. This situation suggests that it is an urgent necessity for the concerned scholars to reflect upon their methodologies and to try hard to search for new approaches.
      Some of the most disputed issues in the research of the Shilla Village Documents can be summarized as follows: (1) the proper appellation of the documents, (2) the deciphering of some of the disputed characters, (3) the dating of the documents, (4) the nature of the documents, (5) the consisting elements of gongyeon 孔烟, (6) the organization criteria of the nine-tiered household system, (7) the function of gyeyeon 計烟, (8) the meaning of the land records, (9) other issues such as the exact location of the village, the relation between the commandery-county system and the Village Documents, the interpretation of the records of horses and cattle, and so on.
      In this paper, three suggestions are made in order to find a way to construct new methodologies for the study of these documents. First, for most of the studies which are conducted from the comparative historical perspectives, it is necessary to explain explicitly how and why such a comparative research is conducted and what is being compared. In this process, it is essential to carry out a more substantial discussion of the internal conditions of the Shilla Kingdom. Second, it is necessary to review the methodologies of economic historical researches, which are carried out with very few reference to the related studies of other research areas. It is essential to understand the economic factors in relation to the period in question, the society itself, and the diverse human populations at the time. Third, as seen in the interpretation of disputed characters of the documents and the confusion of various terminologies, it is urgent to draw a consensus on the most basic and important facts of the documents.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 問題의 提起
      • Ⅱ. 文書의 名稱
      • Ⅲ. 文書의 判讀
      • Ⅳ. 文書의 作成年代
      • Ⅴ. 村落의 性格
      • Ⅰ. 問題의 提起
      • Ⅱ. 文書의 名稱
      • Ⅲ. 文書의 判讀
      • Ⅳ. 文書의 作成年代
      • Ⅴ. 村落의 性格
      • Ⅵ. 孔烟의 構成要素
      • Ⅶ. 9等戶制의 編制基準
      • Ⅷ. 計烟의 機能
      • Ⅸ. 土地 記錄의 論議
      • Ⅹ. 나머지 問題들
      • ⅩⅠ. 맺음말-硏究方法論의 檢討
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼