RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      레슬링 선수의 경기 종목 및 고등학생·대학생간의 체력요소 비교 = Comparison of physical fitness factors for between high school and university, classified by style of wrestler

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11670716

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of the study was comparative analysis of the physical fitness factors classified by age and style.
      A subject of this study was 23 wrestlers of high school and university located in Jeonlabuk-do, and divided into four groups; 11 of Free and 12 of Greco-Roman style, 12 of high school and 11 of university wrestlers. They was measured for the basic physical fitness, isoknetic muscular strength of knee and anaerobic power.
      The results of the study can be summarized as follows; First, the results showed classified by style, Free style and Greco-Roman style in wrestlers. The basic physical fitness factors evaluated on muscular strength, flexibility, agility, power, balance was not significant difference between Free and Greco-Roman style in wrestlers. But Free style was significantly higher than Greco-Roman style in cardiopulmonary endurance and Greco-Roman style was significantly higher than Free style in muscular endurance. The anaerobic power was significant difference between Free and Greco-Roman style in wrestlers and Greco-Roman style showed higher than Free style. And muscular strength(peak torque%BW) evaluated on the velocity of isokinetic load, 60〫 /sec, the right extensor, flexor and left extensor were not significant difference between Free and Greco-Roman style in wrestlers. But the Greco-Roman style was significantly higher than Free style in left flexor.
      Second, the results showed classified by age, High school and University wrestler groups. The basic physical fitness factors evaluated on cardiopulmonary endurance, muscular strength, flexibility, agility, power, balance were not significant difference between high school and university wrestler groups, but university wrestler group was significantly higher than high school group in muscular endurance. The anaerobic was not significant difference between high school and university wrestler group but university wrestler group showed a high value than high school wrestler group. And muscular strength(peak torque%BW) evaluated on the velocity of isokinetic load, 60〫 /sec, the left extensor and flexor were not significant difference between high school and university wrestler group. But university wrestler group was significantly higher than high school wrestler group in right extensor and flexor.
      As a results, the Greco-Roman style wrestlers are need to training for muscular endurance, anaerobic power, strength of knee and Free style wrestlers are require to cardiopulmonary endurance and flexibility training.
      On the one hand, the high school wrestlers showed low value than university wrestlers as a whole. Accordingly high school wrestlers should do training about all physical fitness factors. In the case of university wrestlers should do training for muscular endurance and strength of knee.
      번역하기

      The purpose of the study was comparative analysis of the physical fitness factors classified by age and style. A subject of this study was 23 wrestlers of high school and university located in Jeonlabuk-do, and divided into four groups; 11 of Free an...

      The purpose of the study was comparative analysis of the physical fitness factors classified by age and style.
      A subject of this study was 23 wrestlers of high school and university located in Jeonlabuk-do, and divided into four groups; 11 of Free and 12 of Greco-Roman style, 12 of high school and 11 of university wrestlers. They was measured for the basic physical fitness, isoknetic muscular strength of knee and anaerobic power.
      The results of the study can be summarized as follows; First, the results showed classified by style, Free style and Greco-Roman style in wrestlers. The basic physical fitness factors evaluated on muscular strength, flexibility, agility, power, balance was not significant difference between Free and Greco-Roman style in wrestlers. But Free style was significantly higher than Greco-Roman style in cardiopulmonary endurance and Greco-Roman style was significantly higher than Free style in muscular endurance. The anaerobic power was significant difference between Free and Greco-Roman style in wrestlers and Greco-Roman style showed higher than Free style. And muscular strength(peak torque%BW) evaluated on the velocity of isokinetic load, 60〫 /sec, the right extensor, flexor and left extensor were not significant difference between Free and Greco-Roman style in wrestlers. But the Greco-Roman style was significantly higher than Free style in left flexor.
      Second, the results showed classified by age, High school and University wrestler groups. The basic physical fitness factors evaluated on cardiopulmonary endurance, muscular strength, flexibility, agility, power, balance were not significant difference between high school and university wrestler groups, but university wrestler group was significantly higher than high school group in muscular endurance. The anaerobic was not significant difference between high school and university wrestler group but university wrestler group showed a high value than high school wrestler group. And muscular strength(peak torque%BW) evaluated on the velocity of isokinetic load, 60〫 /sec, the left extensor and flexor were not significant difference between high school and university wrestler group. But university wrestler group was significantly higher than high school wrestler group in right extensor and flexor.
      As a results, the Greco-Roman style wrestlers are need to training for muscular endurance, anaerobic power, strength of knee and Free style wrestlers are require to cardiopulmonary endurance and flexibility training.
      On the one hand, the high school wrestlers showed low value than university wrestlers as a whole. Accordingly high school wrestlers should do training about all physical fitness factors. In the case of university wrestlers should do training for muscular endurance and strength of knee.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서 론 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 1
      • 2. 연구목적 3
      • 3. 연구가설 3
      • 4. 연구의 제한점 4
      • Ⅰ. 서 론 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 1
      • 2. 연구목적 3
      • 3. 연구가설 3
      • 4. 연구의 제한점 4
      • 5. 용어의 정의 4
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 5
      • 2. 체력 5
      • 1) 체력의 개념 및 정의 5
      • 2) 체력의 구성요소 7
      • 3) 체력이 경기력에 미치는 영향 10
      • 4) 레슬링 종목별 요구되는 체력요소 12
      • Ⅲ. 연구방법 15
      • 1. 연구대상 15
      • 2. 연구설계 15
      • 3. 측정도구 17
      • 4. 측정방법 17
      • 5. 자료분석 및 통계처리 19
      • Ⅳ. 연구결과 20
      • 1. 레슬링 종목별 선수들의 체력 비교 20
      • 1) 레슬링 종목별 선수들의 기초체력요소 비교 20
      • 2) 레슬링 종목별 선수들에의 무산소성파워 비교 22
      • 3) 레슬링 종목별 선수들의 각근력 비교 23
      • 2. 고등학교․대학교 선수들의 체력 비교 25
      • 1) 고등학교․대학교 선수들의 기초체력요소 비교 25
      • 2) 고등학교․대학교 선수들의무산소성 파워 비교 27
      • 3) 고등학교․대학교 선수들의 각근력 비교 28
      • Ⅴ. 논 의 30
      • 1. 레슬링 종목별 체력요소의 차이 30
      • 2. 학년별 체력요소의 차이 33
      • Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언 37
      • 참고문헌 39
      • 부 록 44
      • ABSTRACT 46
      • 표 목 차
      • <표 1> 체력의 요소 분류 (김기학, 1999) 7
      • <표 2> 체력요소 (Clarke, 1967) 9
      • <표 3> 대상자의 신체적 특징 15
      • <표 4> 측정도구와 용도 17
      • <표 5> 기초체력검사 항목 및 방법 17
      • <표 6> 레슬링 종목별 선수들의 기초체력요소 비교 20
      • <표 7> 레슬링 종목별 선수들의 무산소성 파워 비교 23
      • <표 8> 레슬링 종목별 선수들의 각근력 비교 23
      • <표 9> 고등학교․대학교 선수들의 기초체력요소 비교 25
      • <표 10> 고등학교․대학교 선수들의 무산소성 파워 비교 27
      • <표 11> 고등학교․대학교 선수들의 각근력 비교 28
      • 그 림 목 차
      • <그림 1> Ishiko(1970)의 체력분류표 6
      • <그림 2> 연구설계 16
      • <그림 3> 연구설계 17
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼