This study empirically investigates the relationship between a firm’s manager type and its carbon intensity and examines the effects of information asymmetry and carbon disclosure on this relationship. The findings are as follows. First, in excessiv...
This study empirically investigates the relationship between a firm’s manager type and its carbon intensity and examines the effects of information asymmetry and carbon disclosure on this relationship. The findings are as follows. First, in excessive energy-consuming industries, the carbon intensity of a firm having a professional manager is higher than that of an owner-manager firm. It is inferred that a professional manager is passive toward energy-efficiency investments in reducing carbon emissions because of the risks to his or her compensation and job security based on short-term performance evaluations. Second, the high information asymmetry of such a firm further increases the positive relation between the existence of a professional manager and its carbon intensity. This finding implies that when the information asymmetry between a manager and mandator in such a firm is high, a professional manager can better hide the lack of investment in reducing carbon emissions; thus, a firm has higher carbon intensity. Third, a professional manager’s shareholding does not impact carbon intensity. Finally, when a professional manager firm voluntarily discloses its carbon information, the increase of its carbon intensity is alleviated. The study is the first to confirm the relation between a firm’s manager type and its carbon intensity. The results of this study contribute to confirming that a firm’s manager type is a factor affecting its carbon intensity, which has important implications for managers and investors.