RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      WTO 정보기술협정(ITA) 현황과 쟁점

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103042211

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Amid the stalemate of the DDA negotiations, the ITA-style plurilateral negotiations for sectoral liberalization attract public attention as a realistic alternative approach in the WTO. In particular, after the successful completion of the ITA expansio...

      Amid the stalemate of the DDA negotiations, the ITA-style plurilateral negotiations for sectoral liberalization attract public attention as a realistic alternative approach in the WTO. In particular, after the successful completion of the ITA expansion product list in July, the multilateral effort for trade liberalization is regaining its support and interest from business communities.
      Aiming to introduce historical background and basic concept about the ITA, this article tries to overview the origin and evolvement of sectoral negotiations, the negotiating history of the ITA deal and the subsequent implementation issues, the final result of the ITA expansion product list, and the relevant WTO jurisprudence in the EC-IT products case.
      First, the ITA is a plurilateral agreement by some WTO members to eliminate tariffs on 203 IT product items, and the current expansion deal is to liberalize additional 201 IT product items. While this deal has been agreed by certain number of WTO members, it would facilitate multilateral trade liberalization since the result of negotiations will be implemented by the revision of MFN tariff bindings in members' WTO schedules of concession. Considering that this approach will be continued for the time being at the WTO, we need to catch up such change of negotiating environment and make serious efforts to reflect our interests effectively into the negotiations.
      Second, several outstanding issues are to be further developed, including the relationship between ITA and WTO, product classification and scope of attachment B items and the NTB work program. While the participants continue to discuss these matters at the ITA committee, the outcome of the discussion has not been satisfactory so far. In particular, attention and systemic approach for the appropriate product classification of attachment B items would be needed. The panel findings of the EC-IT product case suggest a useful benchmark for clarifying the meaning and scope of product descriptions in attachment B.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "WTO documents (G/IT/)"

      2 한국전자정보통신산업진흥회, "WTO ITA 확대협상 대응을 위한 품목별 영향분석" 지식경제부 2012

      3 한국전자정보통신산업진흥회, "WTO ITA 확대협상 대응방안 연구" 지식경제부 2012

      4 Dreyer, Iana, "Trade in Information Technology Goods: Adapting the ITA to 21st Century Technological Change" ECIPE 2008

      5 Anderson, Michael, "The Information Technology Agreement: An Assessment of World Trade in Information Technology Products" 2010

      6 Hindley, Brian, "Protectionism Online: Internet Censorship and International Trade Law" ECIPE 2009

      7 Fliess, Barbara, "Of Chips, Floppy Disks and Great Timing: Assessing the WTO Information Technology Agreement" Institut Fran 1997

      8 Lee-Makiyama, Hosuk, "Future-proofing World Trade in Technology: Turning the WTO IT Agreement (ITA) into the International Digital Economy Agreement (IDEA)" ECIPE 2011

      9 World Bank, "Beyond the Information Technology Agreement: Harmonization of Standards and Trade in Electronics" WB Development Research Group, Trade Team 2009

      10 WTO, "15 Years of the Information Technology Agreement: Trade, innovation and global production networks" WTO Publications 2012

      1 "WTO documents (G/IT/)"

      2 한국전자정보통신산업진흥회, "WTO ITA 확대협상 대응을 위한 품목별 영향분석" 지식경제부 2012

      3 한국전자정보통신산업진흥회, "WTO ITA 확대협상 대응방안 연구" 지식경제부 2012

      4 Dreyer, Iana, "Trade in Information Technology Goods: Adapting the ITA to 21st Century Technological Change" ECIPE 2008

      5 Anderson, Michael, "The Information Technology Agreement: An Assessment of World Trade in Information Technology Products" 2010

      6 Hindley, Brian, "Protectionism Online: Internet Censorship and International Trade Law" ECIPE 2009

      7 Fliess, Barbara, "Of Chips, Floppy Disks and Great Timing: Assessing the WTO Information Technology Agreement" Institut Fran 1997

      8 Lee-Makiyama, Hosuk, "Future-proofing World Trade in Technology: Turning the WTO IT Agreement (ITA) into the International Digital Economy Agreement (IDEA)" ECIPE 2011

      9 World Bank, "Beyond the Information Technology Agreement: Harmonization of Standards and Trade in Electronics" WB Development Research Group, Trade Team 2009

      10 WTO, "15 Years of the Information Technology Agreement: Trade, innovation and global production networks" WTO Publications 2012

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (계속평가)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2019-12-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
      2018-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2017-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2016-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-06-08 학술지등록 한글명 : 통상법률
      외국어명 : International Trade Law
      KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.41 0.41 0.25
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.26 0.26 0.508 0.17
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼