RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      소년범 재범 억제를 위한 영국의 노력 및 시사점 = Efforts to Reduce Juvenile Re-offenders in England and Its Implications

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106277802

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In England and Wales, there has been a lot of change in the juvenile justice system through the 20th century. In the early and mid twentieth century, the emphasis on protectionism in the juvenile justice system led to a gradual strengthening of the severe punishment policy in the mid to late 20th century. This trend of juvenile justice is returning to protectionism again in the 21st century. Various attempts have also been made regarding the juvenile justice administration. Independent organizations dedicated to juvenile justice, such as juvenile justice committee and the juvenile crime response team, have been established and operated since the late 20th century in order to maximize specialization of juvenile justice and minimize the political interference. In recent years, the juvenile justice system has been continuously changing, as the crime rate of juvenile offender is decreasing.
      These rich experiences in England and Wales could give many implications to the juvenile justice system in South Korea. In particular, recent changes regarding juvenile re-offenders are worth looking at carefully. In recent decades, the percentage of juvenile re-offenders in the UK has increased. In particular, various efforts are being made in London, where the percentage of juvenile re-offending is remarkably high. The London government also tries to reform administrative organizations in order to strengthen the support for education, training and employment for preventing recidivism and enhancing the role of the community. There are also efforts to improve the collection procedures for juvenile statistics in order to exactly identify the current situations. In addition, the procedures and methods are steadily restructured to suit the characteristics of the juvenile offenders. It is necessary to consider the experience of England and Wales to make a better juvenile justice system in South Korea.
      번역하기

      In England and Wales, there has been a lot of change in the juvenile justice system through the 20th century. In the early and mid twentieth century, the emphasis on protectionism in the juvenile justice system led to a gradual strengthening of the se...

      In England and Wales, there has been a lot of change in the juvenile justice system through the 20th century. In the early and mid twentieth century, the emphasis on protectionism in the juvenile justice system led to a gradual strengthening of the severe punishment policy in the mid to late 20th century. This trend of juvenile justice is returning to protectionism again in the 21st century. Various attempts have also been made regarding the juvenile justice administration. Independent organizations dedicated to juvenile justice, such as juvenile justice committee and the juvenile crime response team, have been established and operated since the late 20th century in order to maximize specialization of juvenile justice and minimize the political interference. In recent years, the juvenile justice system has been continuously changing, as the crime rate of juvenile offender is decreasing.
      These rich experiences in England and Wales could give many implications to the juvenile justice system in South Korea. In particular, recent changes regarding juvenile re-offenders are worth looking at carefully. In recent decades, the percentage of juvenile re-offenders in the UK has increased. In particular, various efforts are being made in London, where the percentage of juvenile re-offending is remarkably high. The London government also tries to reform administrative organizations in order to strengthen the support for education, training and employment for preventing recidivism and enhancing the role of the community. There are also efforts to improve the collection procedures for juvenile statistics in order to exactly identify the current situations. In addition, the procedures and methods are steadily restructured to suit the characteristics of the juvenile offenders. It is necessary to consider the experience of England and Wales to make a better juvenile justice system in South Korea.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김혁, "영국에서의 다이버전과 회복적 사법의 최근 동향 및 그 시사점" 경찰대학 17 (17): 9-34, 2017

      2 이승현, "영국 소년사법제도의 최근 동향" 한국소년정책학회 18 : 157-194, 2012

      3 곽병선, "소년법의 회고와 전망" 한국소년정책학회 26 : 1-28, 2014

      4 박호현, "소년법 개정논의에 대한 고찰" 법학연구소 (44) : 141-167, 2017

      5 Ministry of Justice, "Youth Justice Statistics 2016/17"

      6 Ian Blakeman, "The youth justice system of England and Wales" 2013

      7 Charlie Taylor, "Review of the youth justice system in England and Wales" Mistry of Justice 2016

      8 Ministry of Justice, "Proven reoffending statistics quarterly: July 2013 to June 2014"

      9 Alfred Hakkert, "No more excuses: A new approach to tackling youth crime in England and Wales; A summary" 1998

      10 London Assembly Police and Crime Committee, "Breaking the Cycle Reducing Youth Reoffending in London"

      1 김혁, "영국에서의 다이버전과 회복적 사법의 최근 동향 및 그 시사점" 경찰대학 17 (17): 9-34, 2017

      2 이승현, "영국 소년사법제도의 최근 동향" 한국소년정책학회 18 : 157-194, 2012

      3 곽병선, "소년법의 회고와 전망" 한국소년정책학회 26 : 1-28, 2014

      4 박호현, "소년법 개정논의에 대한 고찰" 법학연구소 (44) : 141-167, 2017

      5 Ministry of Justice, "Youth Justice Statistics 2016/17"

      6 Ian Blakeman, "The youth justice system of England and Wales" 2013

      7 Charlie Taylor, "Review of the youth justice system in England and Wales" Mistry of Justice 2016

      8 Ministry of Justice, "Proven reoffending statistics quarterly: July 2013 to June 2014"

      9 Alfred Hakkert, "No more excuses: A new approach to tackling youth crime in England and Wales; A summary" 1998

      10 London Assembly Police and Crime Committee, "Breaking the Cycle Reducing Youth Reoffending in London"

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.76 0.76 0.75
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.89 0.87 0.999 0.1
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼