RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS SCIE

      Short-term outcomes of the transvaginal minimal mesh procedure for pelvic organ prolapse

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105153894

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications of transvaginal minimal mesh repair without using commercially available kits for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
      Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study involved 91 women who underwent surgical management of POP with originally designed small mesh between July 2014 and August 2015. This mesh is 56% smaller than the mesh widely used in Japan, and it has only two arms delivered into each right and left sacrospinous ligament. The main study outcome was the anatomic cure rate defined as recurrence of POP quantification (POP-Q) stage II or more. We also assessed changes in the overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) and prolapse quality of life questionnaire (P-QOL) and evaluated adverse events. Finally, we compared patient backgrounds between the patients with and without recurrence.
      Results: Prolapse recurred in 10 of 91 patients (11.0%), and all patients with recurrence were diagnosed as POP-Q stage II. As adverse events, only mesh erosion occurred in two (2.2%) and pelvic pain in one (1.1%) of the 91 patients. The OABSS and P-QOL were significantly improved by the operation. When we compared patient backgrounds between the patients with and without recurrence, body mass index was the only factor influencing affecting recurrence.
      Conclusions: Transvaginal minimal mesh repair resulted in successful outcomes with low mesh-related complications and anatomic recurrence at one year. Furthermore, significant improvement in QOL was offered by this procedure. Our minimal mesh technique should be considered as one treatment option for the management of POP.
      번역하기

      Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications of transvaginal minimal mesh repair without using commercially available kits for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort...

      Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications of transvaginal minimal mesh repair without using commercially available kits for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
      Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study involved 91 women who underwent surgical management of POP with originally designed small mesh between July 2014 and August 2015. This mesh is 56% smaller than the mesh widely used in Japan, and it has only two arms delivered into each right and left sacrospinous ligament. The main study outcome was the anatomic cure rate defined as recurrence of POP quantification (POP-Q) stage II or more. We also assessed changes in the overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) and prolapse quality of life questionnaire (P-QOL) and evaluated adverse events. Finally, we compared patient backgrounds between the patients with and without recurrence.
      Results: Prolapse recurred in 10 of 91 patients (11.0%), and all patients with recurrence were diagnosed as POP-Q stage II. As adverse events, only mesh erosion occurred in two (2.2%) and pelvic pain in one (1.1%) of the 91 patients. The OABSS and P-QOL were significantly improved by the operation. When we compared patient backgrounds between the patients with and without recurrence, body mass index was the only factor influencing affecting recurrence.
      Conclusions: Transvaginal minimal mesh repair resulted in successful outcomes with low mesh-related complications and anatomic recurrence at one year. Furthermore, significant improvement in QOL was offered by this procedure. Our minimal mesh technique should be considered as one treatment option for the management of POP.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Rogo-Gupta L, "Trends in surgical mesh use for pelvic organ prolapse from 2000 to 2010" 120 : 1105-1115, 2012

      2 Collinet P, "Transvaginal mesh technique for pelvic organ prolapse repair: mesh exposure management and risk factors" 17 : 315-320, 2006

      3 Jacquetin B, "Total transvaginal mesh (TVM) technique for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a 5-year prospective follow-up study" 24 : 1679-1686, 2013

      4 Summers A, "The relationship between anterior and apical compartment support" 194 : 1438-1443, 2006

      5 김미선, "The association of pelvic organ prolapse severity and improvement in overactive bladder symptoms after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse" 대한산부인과학회 59 (59): 214-219, 2016

      6 Takahashi S, "Tension-free vaginal mesh procedure for pelvic organ prolapse: a single-center experience of 310 cases with 1-year follow up" 17 : 353-358, 2010

      7 Maher C, "Surgical management of anterior vaginal wall prolapse: an evidencebased literature review" 17 : 195-201, 2006

      8 Long CY, "Risk factors of surgical failure following transvaginal mesh repair for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse" 161 : 224-227, 2012

      9 Sekiguchi Y, "Reinforcement of suspensory ligaments under local anesthesia cures pelvic organ prolapse: 12-month results" 25 : 783-789, 2014

      10 Miller D, "Prospective clinical assessment of the transvaginal mesh technique for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse-5-year results" 17 : 139-143, 2011

      1 Rogo-Gupta L, "Trends in surgical mesh use for pelvic organ prolapse from 2000 to 2010" 120 : 1105-1115, 2012

      2 Collinet P, "Transvaginal mesh technique for pelvic organ prolapse repair: mesh exposure management and risk factors" 17 : 315-320, 2006

      3 Jacquetin B, "Total transvaginal mesh (TVM) technique for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a 5-year prospective follow-up study" 24 : 1679-1686, 2013

      4 Summers A, "The relationship between anterior and apical compartment support" 194 : 1438-1443, 2006

      5 김미선, "The association of pelvic organ prolapse severity and improvement in overactive bladder symptoms after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse" 대한산부인과학회 59 (59): 214-219, 2016

      6 Takahashi S, "Tension-free vaginal mesh procedure for pelvic organ prolapse: a single-center experience of 310 cases with 1-year follow up" 17 : 353-358, 2010

      7 Maher C, "Surgical management of anterior vaginal wall prolapse: an evidencebased literature review" 17 : 195-201, 2006

      8 Long CY, "Risk factors of surgical failure following transvaginal mesh repair for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse" 161 : 224-227, 2012

      9 Sekiguchi Y, "Reinforcement of suspensory ligaments under local anesthesia cures pelvic organ prolapse: 12-month results" 25 : 783-789, 2014

      10 Miller D, "Prospective clinical assessment of the transvaginal mesh technique for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse-5-year results" 17 : 139-143, 2011

      11 Kuribayashi M, "Predictor of de novo stress urinary incontinence following TVM procedure: a further analysis of preoperative voiding function" 24 : 407-411, 2013

      12 Marcus-Braun N, "Persistent pelvic pain following transvaginal mesh surgery: a cause for mesh removal" 162 : 224-228, 2012

      13 Altman D, "Pelvic organ prolapse repair using the $Uphold^{TM}$ Vaginal Support System: a 1-year multicenter study" 27 : 1337-1345, 2016

      14 Nieminen K, "Outcomes after anterior vaginal wall repair with mesh: a randomized, controlled trial with a 3 year follow-up" 203 : 235.e1-235.e8, 2010

      15 Giri A, "Obesity and pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies" 217 : 11-26, 2017

      16 Hiltunen R, "Low-weight polypropylene mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomized controlled trial" 110 : 455-462, 2007

      17 Dietz HP, "Levator trauma is associated with pelvic organ prolapse" 115 : 979-984, 2008

      18 Wong V, "Is levator avulsion a predictor of cystocele recurrence following anterior vaginal mesh placement?" 42 : 230-234, 2013

      19 Abed H, "Incidence and management of graft erosion, wound granulation, and dyspareunia following vaginal prolapse repair with graft materials: a systematic review" 22 : 789-798, 2011

      20 Abbott S, "Evaluation and management of complications from synthetic mesh after pelvic reconstructive surgery: a multicenter study" 210 : 163.e1-163.e8, 2014

      21 Diwadkar GB, "Complication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapse surgical repair: a systematic review" 113 : 367-373, 2009

      22 Takeyama M, "Basic procedures in tension-free vaginal mesh operation for pelvic organ prolapse" 18 : 555-556, 2011

      23 Altman D, "Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic-organ prolapse" 364 : 1826-1836, 2011

      24 Cespedes RD, "Anterior approach bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation for vaginal vault prolapse" 56 (56): 70-75, 2000

      25 Rooney K, "Advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse is highly correlated with apical prolapse" 195 : 1837-1840, 2006

      26 Sivaslioglu AA, "A randomized comparison of polypropylene mesh surgery with site-specific surgery in the treatment of cystocoele" 19 : 467-471, 2008

      27 이동민, "A Predictive Factor in Overactive Bladder Symptoms Improvement after Combined Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse Repair: A Pilot Study" 대한비뇨의학회 53 (53): 405-409, 2012

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2019-03-12 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한비뇨기과학회 -> 대한비뇨의학회 KCI등재
      2016-03-04 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Investigative and Clinical Urology KCI등재
      2016-01-15 학술지명변경 한글명 : Korean Journal of Urology -> Investigative and Clinical Urology KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-02-21 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한비뇨기과학회지 -> Korean Journal of Urology
      외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Urology -> 미등록
      KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.14 0.14 0.13
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.13 0.12 0.314 0.23
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼