RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      토지거래허가제의 인가적 성질 = The Land Transaction Licensing System & Its Inherent Nature of approval

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76455160

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

        Land transactions are reqcired by law to be performed under lieense. ln other words they are to be transacted within an approved area after having obtained approval from the administrative authorities. Such an approval is the integral part...

        Land transactions are reqcired by law to be performed under lieense. ln other words they are to be transacted within an approved area after having obtained approval from the administrative authorities. Such an approval is the integral part of making such transactions becoming valid, and anyone violating such a requirement of obtaining the approval is subject to penalties.<BR>  The land transaction licensing system originated from an idea that it would help restrain land speculation together with the rise of land prices within a given area. And as specified in the law, it has two sides of "license" and "approval" in that the Govemment guides and adjusts the transactions of private persons. ln other words land transactions are reqcired by law to obtain license and the law carries the penalties for anyone violating it. This is the clear evidenee that entering into a land transaction contract involves two sides of license and approval.<BR>  And scientifically the land transactions licensing system has an innate feature of "license" in that it prohibits an unlicensed contract and takes effect only when supported by "approval" from the administrative authorities. It also scientifically has a feature of "approval" because it becomes legally valid only when complemented by the approval from the administrative authorities.<BR>  After all the land transaction licensing system has a feature of license by law, and it also has a feature of approval when seen from a scientific aspect.<BR>  Land transaction contracts essentially adopt the licensing system. However, they also have a feature of approval as seen in the law, in the theories and judicial precedents, and in the concepts of other individual laws as weIl as in the provisions of the foreign laws.<BR>  Firstly, land transaction contracts have a feature of approval when seen by the law. This is because they become legally valid when complemented by administrative measures such as approval, necessary conditions and procedures for approval, and lose validity if not supported by such measures.<BR>  Secondly, land transaction contracts have two sides of "license" and "approval" in theories. Traditionally a theory of mandate prevailed, separating the concept of "approval" from "license". Today, a theory of two sides of "license" and "approval" is widely accepted recognizing the feature of "approval" inherent in land transaction contracts.<BR>  Thirdly, judicial precedents also uphold the feature of "approval" inherent in land transaction contracts. The Constitution Court of Korea upheld the constitutionality of the land transaction licensing system, and the features of "license" and "approval" inherent in the land transaction contracts were recognized as valid in the precedents of the Supreme Court.<BR>  Fourthly, other laws recognize the feature of "approval" inherent in the land transaction contract. Examples of such laws include "The Law Concerning Foreigner"s Acquisition of Land & Its Administration", "The Traditional Temples Preservation Law", "The Nongovernmental School Law", and "The Agricultural Land Law", all of which recognizes the feature of "approval" inherent in the land transaction contracts.<BR>  Fifthly, approval for the land transaction contracts given in foreign countries goes through the legal formalities prescribed in the law. Germany can be taken as an example. ln Germany either the land transaction contracts under the Federal Construction Law or the agricultural land transaction contracts under the Farmland Transaction Law is required by law to acquire approval.<BR>  In conclusion the feature of "approval" inherent in the la

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Abstract
        Ⅰ. 서론
        Ⅱ. 토지의 재산권 보장과 거래계약
        Ⅲ. 토지거래계약의 허 · 인가
        Ⅳ. 토지거래계약 인가에 대한 법적 성질
        Ⅴ. 결론
        참고문헌
      • Abstract
        Ⅰ. 서론
        Ⅱ. 토지의 재산권 보장과 거래계약
        Ⅲ. 토지거래계약의 허 · 인가
        Ⅳ. 토지거래계약 인가에 대한 법적 성질
        Ⅴ. 결론
        참고문헌
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.84 0.84 0.73
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.69 0.69 0.687 0.35
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼