해외플랜트 공사 벤치마킹 프로그램 개발 = Development of Construction Benchmarking for Oversea Industrial Projects

국문 초록 (Abstract)

2003년 이후 국내 건설회사의 해외 건설수주액이 급격히 늘어나고 있다. 해외 플랜트 공사는 시공사의 EPC와 사업관리 능력이 성패를 좌우한다. 시공사의 사업관리 능력 제고하기 위해서는 건설성과를 측정하고 평가하는 과정이 필요하다. 따라서 본 논문은 해외 플랜트 참여사들의 건설성과 벤치마킹을 위한 프로그램을 개발하였다. 건설 성과지표는 사업비, 공기, 품질, 안전 등으로 구성되어 있다. 그리고 해외에서 수행된 플랜트 공사 10개의 자료를 입수하여 성과를 분석하였다. 해외 플랜트 공사 벤치마킹 프로그램을 개발하는 과정에서 업계의 피드백과 교훈을 제시하였다. 그리고 본 프로그램이 지속적으로 활용되기 위해 고려해야 할 사항을 제안하였다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The oversea construction contract amount has sharply increased since 2003. The contractor's capability for EPC and project management is a key factor for a successful industrial construction project. Construction performance measurement and evaluation is needed to improve contractor's project management capability. Therefore, this paper proposes the construction performance benchmarking program for oversea industrial projects. Performance metrics consists of project cost, schedule, quality, and safety. Data from 10 oversea industrial projects were collected and analyzed. Also, this paper describes the process for development of the benchmarking program and lessons learned from industry are summarized. Finally, this paper recommends how sustainable benchmarking program should be established and implemented.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Newcombe, R, "The anatomy of two projects: A Comparative Analysis Approach" 18 (18): 189-199, 2000

2 Park, H. S., "Public infrastructure practitioner’s recognition on project performance" 8 (8): 93-100, 2007

3 Atkinson, R, "Project management: Cost, Time, and Quality, Two Best Guesses and a Phenomenon, It’s Time to Accept Other Success Criteria" 17 (17): 337-342, 1999

4 Songer, A. D., "Project characteristics for successful public-sector design-build" ASCE 123 (123): 34-40, 1997

5 Meade, G., "Performance of the canadian construction industry - a benchmarking pilot" 23 (23): 8-11, 2006

6 Ko, Y. S., "Performance management in the public sector"

7 Lee, K. S, "National budget and policy goals: Government Innovation"

8 Brown, A, "Measuring the effect of project management on construction outputs: a new approach" 18 (18): 327-335, 2000

9 Shenhar, A. J., "Mapping the dimensions of project success" 28 (28): 5-13, 1997

10 Cox, R., "Management’s perception of key performance indicators for construction" ASCE 1292 : 142-151, 2003

11 OECD, "Improving evaluation practices: Best Practice Guidelines for Evaluation and Background Paper" 1999

12 Chan, A. P. C, "Evaluation of enhanced design and build system-A case study of hospital project" 18 (18): 863-871, 2000

13 Bubshait, A. A., "Evaluating the general conditions of a construction contract" 12 (12): 133-135, 1994

14 Park, H. S., "Development of construction productivity metrics system" Univ. of Texas 2002

15 ICAK, "Development of a performance framework for oversea plant projects"

16 Chan, A. P. C., "Determinants of project success in the construction industry of Hong Kong" Univ. of South Australia 1996

17 Naoum, S. G, "Critical analysis of time and cost of management and traditional contracts" ASCE 120 (120): 687-705, 1994

18 Hatush, Z., "Criteria for contractor selection" 15 (15): 19-38, 1997

19 Park, H. S., "Benchmarking of construction productivity" ASCE 131 (131): 772-778, 2005

20 Costa, D. B., "Benchmarking initiatives in the construction industry: Lessons learned and improvement opportunities" ASCE 22 (22): 158-167, 2006

21 Fisher, D, "Benchmarking in construction industry" ASCE 11 (11): 50-57, 1995

22 Chan, M., "Australia" 1 (1): 35-69, 2002