As more and more data are collected one may ask whether the data collected within a short period of time are same. In this case traditional hypothesis testing of H0:μ1=μ2 VS H1:μ1≠μ2is used to determine whether the data are same when there is...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76379305
2008
-
300
KCI등재
학술저널
1-6(6쪽)
4
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
As more and more data are collected one may ask whether the data collected within a short period of time are same. In this case traditional hypothesis testing of H0:μ1=μ2 VS H1:μ1≠μ2is used to determine whether the data are same when there is...
As more and more data are collected one may ask whether the data collected within a short period of time are same. In this case traditional hypothesis testing of H0:μ1=μ2 VS H1:μ1≠μ2is used to determine whether the data are same when there is no knowledge about equivalence testing. However, this type of hypothesis testing has the undesirable property of penalizing higher precision. So TOST is to be performed in the event of equivalence testing. In this study equivalence testing is introduced where one can find the applications in industry. Traditional two sample t testing is to be compared with the equivalent testing and the procedure to perform the equivalence testing is to be presented along with an example. Finally equivalence testing in terms of the other parameters such as variance, proportion or failure rate is to be sought.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 Hauck, W., "Type of Bioequivalence and Related Statistical Considerations" 30 : 181-187, 1992
2 Westlake, W.J., "Symmetric Confidence Intervals for Bioequivalence Trials" 32 : 741-744, 1976
3 Stein, J, "Sample Size Consideration for Assessing the Equivalence of Two Process Means" 105-110, 2000
4 Westlake, W.J., "Response to T.B.L. Kirkwood: Bioequivalence Testing-A Need to Rethink" 37 : 589-594, 1981
5 Rogers, J.L., "Psychological Bulletin" 113 : 553-565, 1993
6 Schuirmann, D.J., "On Hypothesis Testing to Determine if the Mean of a Normal Distribution is Contained in a Known Interval" 37 : 617-, 1981
7 Allen I.E, "Different, Equivalent or Both?" 77-79, 2006
8 Roy, T., "Calibrated Nonparametric Confidence Sets" 21 : 103-109, 1997
9 Metzler, C. M., "Bioavailability. A Problem in Equivalence" 30 : 309-317, 1974
10 Lamprecht, J.L., "Applied Analysis for Process Improvement" ASQ Quality Press 2005
1 Hauck, W., "Type of Bioequivalence and Related Statistical Considerations" 30 : 181-187, 1992
2 Westlake, W.J., "Symmetric Confidence Intervals for Bioequivalence Trials" 32 : 741-744, 1976
3 Stein, J, "Sample Size Consideration for Assessing the Equivalence of Two Process Means" 105-110, 2000
4 Westlake, W.J., "Response to T.B.L. Kirkwood: Bioequivalence Testing-A Need to Rethink" 37 : 589-594, 1981
5 Rogers, J.L., "Psychological Bulletin" 113 : 553-565, 1993
6 Schuirmann, D.J., "On Hypothesis Testing to Determine if the Mean of a Normal Distribution is Contained in a Known Interval" 37 : 617-, 1981
7 Allen I.E, "Different, Equivalent or Both?" 77-79, 2006
8 Roy, T., "Calibrated Nonparametric Confidence Sets" 21 : 103-109, 1997
9 Metzler, C. M., "Bioavailability. A Problem in Equivalence" 30 : 309-317, 1974
10 Lamprecht, J.L., "Applied Analysis for Process Improvement" ASQ Quality Press 2005
11 Schuirmann, D.J., "A Comparison of the Two Onesided Tests Procedure and the Power Approach for Assessing the Equivalence of Average Bioavailability" 15 : 657-680, 1987
경영품질이 기업성과에 미치는 영향: 정보기술(IT)효과를 중심으로
지방공기업 경영평가와 경영품질모형의 통합화에 관한 연구
대용특성을 활용한 스크리닝 검사에서 제한된 생산용량의 효과분석
자기상관 공정에 대한 누적합관리도에서 설계모수 값의 결정
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2026 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | |
2017-07-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | |
2017-07-01 | 평가 | 등재후보로 하락(현장점검) (기타) | |
2015-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2006-01-03 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management | |
2005-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2002-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
1999-07-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.8 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.93 | 1 | 0.751 | 0.38 |