RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      사회적 지위와 기부행동의 연관성: 소득 수준, 주관적 계층의식에 따른 기부참여, 기부의사 분석을 중심으로 = The Relationship between Social Status and Donation Behavior: Focusing on Analysis of Donation Participation and Donation Intention

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109488908

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Donation is a prosocial behavior of giving one’s income and assets without expecting anything in return, serving as an important measure of a society’s social integration and cultural development. This paper explores how objective social status and subjective social status influence donation behavior, categorizing donation behavior into four groups: (1) the indifferent group, which is not interested in donating, (2) the simple intention group, which has the intention to donate but has not taken action, (3) the temporary participation group, which donates but has no future plans to continue, and (4) the active participation group, which actively plans and participates in donations. For the analysis, the 2023 “Social Survey” data from Statistics Korea was used. The results of the multinomial logit analysis showed that the probability of being in the active participation group was highest when income level and subjective class consciousness were at their peak. Additionally, even among low-income households with a monthly income of less than 1 million won (USD 750), the likelihood of expressing interest in or participating in donations increased as subjective class consciousness rose. The study’s findings, which indicate that the higher the socioeconomic status, the greater the likelihood of participating in donation behavior, differ from some western studies like Piff et al. (2010). Furthermore, the analysis found that residing in a metropolitan area increased the probability of donation intention and participation, and that the baby boom generation had higher donation participation and intention compared to the MZ generation. These results remained robust even after introducing various demographic and social control variables.
      번역하기

      Donation is a prosocial behavior of giving one’s income and assets without expecting anything in return, serving as an important measure of a society’s social integration and cultural development. This paper explores how objective social status an...

      Donation is a prosocial behavior of giving one’s income and assets without expecting anything in return, serving as an important measure of a society’s social integration and cultural development. This paper explores how objective social status and subjective social status influence donation behavior, categorizing donation behavior into four groups: (1) the indifferent group, which is not interested in donating, (2) the simple intention group, which has the intention to donate but has not taken action, (3) the temporary participation group, which donates but has no future plans to continue, and (4) the active participation group, which actively plans and participates in donations. For the analysis, the 2023 “Social Survey” data from Statistics Korea was used. The results of the multinomial logit analysis showed that the probability of being in the active participation group was highest when income level and subjective class consciousness were at their peak. Additionally, even among low-income households with a monthly income of less than 1 million won (USD 750), the likelihood of expressing interest in or participating in donations increased as subjective class consciousness rose. The study’s findings, which indicate that the higher the socioeconomic status, the greater the likelihood of participating in donation behavior, differ from some western studies like Piff et al. (2010). Furthermore, the analysis found that residing in a metropolitan area increased the probability of donation intention and participation, and that the baby boom generation had higher donation participation and intention compared to the MZ generation. These results remained robust even after introducing various demographic and social control variables.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼