RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      김상용 교수 정년 기념 상가건물의 공시제도에 관한 연구 -권리유형별 활용사례를 중심으로- = A Case Study on the system of cadastral and land registration of Business Center Building in Korea

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Today, Buildings are becoming lager, higher, multifunctional with the urbanization process and urban regeneration project. Nowadays our real estate market is stablizing along with low growth in economy. Builders are usually split and pre-sale commercial residential buildings are easy to raise the initial cost and effort to spread the risk. Clear and complete the public notification systems of the commercial building is very important to protect the property rights of investors and urgent safety in the transaction. However, such systems of commercial buildings have been unable to live up to this reality. Act on the ownership and management of aggregate buildings in 1984 (hereinafter referred to as the aggregate buildings act) was to regulate the possession and use of building set in the form of high-rise buildings, and for simply intended to notice the right relationship. The Act also recognized sectional ownership of business center building with certain requirements and revised in 2003. Nevertheless, commercial buildings is still divided into the sole ownership, the co-ownership representing de facto partitioned ownership, sectional ownership. It causes confusion in the transaction safety as well as restriction investment and use of buildings. This is because disclosure of the commercial building not properly reflect reality. This study analyzes the system of notification by dividing the commercial building on aggregate buildings act and the co-ownership representing de facto partition ownership. The case study of 11 randomly selected commercial buildings to review cadastral and land registration of business center building and implicated in our real estate system. Through the 11 cases, excessive registered holder register, classification of books and looks impossible, inconsistency of books, false entry/record of books, such as has been pointed out as problems. In order to solve These problems first, the co-ownership representing de facto partition ownership of commercial buildings will need to convert to the commercial building on aggregate buildings act the long-term. Second, set aggregate buildings act the scope of Article 1 of 2 shall be expanded in accordance with the recent reality and nature of the commercial building. Third, Its expansion will be through a thorough complement the system of cadastral and land registration of business center building.
      번역하기

      Today, Buildings are becoming lager, higher, multifunctional with the urbanization process and urban regeneration project. Nowadays our real estate market is stablizing along with low growth in economy. Builders are usually split and pre-sale commerci...

      Today, Buildings are becoming lager, higher, multifunctional with the urbanization process and urban regeneration project. Nowadays our real estate market is stablizing along with low growth in economy. Builders are usually split and pre-sale commercial residential buildings are easy to raise the initial cost and effort to spread the risk. Clear and complete the public notification systems of the commercial building is very important to protect the property rights of investors and urgent safety in the transaction. However, such systems of commercial buildings have been unable to live up to this reality. Act on the ownership and management of aggregate buildings in 1984 (hereinafter referred to as the aggregate buildings act) was to regulate the possession and use of building set in the form of high-rise buildings, and for simply intended to notice the right relationship. The Act also recognized sectional ownership of business center building with certain requirements and revised in 2003. Nevertheless, commercial buildings is still divided into the sole ownership, the co-ownership representing de facto partitioned ownership, sectional ownership. It causes confusion in the transaction safety as well as restriction investment and use of buildings. This is because disclosure of the commercial building not properly reflect reality. This study analyzes the system of notification by dividing the commercial building on aggregate buildings act and the co-ownership representing de facto partition ownership. The case study of 11 randomly selected commercial buildings to review cadastral and land registration of business center building and implicated in our real estate system. Through the 11 cases, excessive registered holder register, classification of books and looks impossible, inconsistency of books, false entry/record of books, such as has been pointed out as problems. In order to solve These problems first, the co-ownership representing de facto partition ownership of commercial buildings will need to convert to the commercial building on aggregate buildings act the long-term. Second, set aggregate buildings act the scope of Article 1 of 2 shall be expanded in accordance with the recent reality and nature of the commercial building. Third, Its expansion will be through a thorough complement the system of cadastral and land registration of business center building.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼