This paper is designed, under carefully review tendency of Classical Chinese Subject test, make a plan what is for should pursue to improve or establish new model what Classical Chinese Subject test in High School 3Grade National Achievement Test(NAT)...
This paper is designed, under carefully review tendency of Classical Chinese Subject test, make a plan what is for should pursue to improve or establish new model what Classical Chinese Subject test in High School 3Grade National Achievement Test(NAT). For archive this goal, not use the periodical summative evaluation by Schools, such as midterm and final exams, but focus on study NAT evaluation question by municipal and provincial offices of education NAT is very similar common sense with College Scholastic Ability Test, is performed in the national government level, make a multiple-choice type question, and we can guess the group of makes this test question, who also consists of experienced and qualified teacher. Review target is only High 3Grade Classical Chinese test in NAT, take three times during October, 2007 to October, 2009. In this review, I get some of problem in the field of ``question annotation``, ``miswritten character or word``, ``question item stem``, ``basic and original material data for make question``, ``alternative for answer``, and also get significant suggestions how to improve Classical Chinese Subject test question type and modeling.