RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCIE SCOPUS

      Impact of Hospital Volume and the Experience of Endoscopist on Adverse Events Related to Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Prospective Observational Study = Impact of Hospital Volume and the Experience of Endoscopist on Adverse Events Related to Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Prospective Observational Study

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106661435

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background/Aims: Few studies have addressed the relationship between the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and hospital case volume or endoscopist’s experience with inconsistent results. The...

      Background/Aims: Few studies have addressed the relationship between the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and hospital case volume or endoscopist’s experience with inconsistent results. The aim of our study was to investigate the impact of hospital case volume and endoscopist’s experience on the AEs associated with ERCP and to analyze patient- and procedure-related risk factors for post-ERCP AEs. Methods: From January 2015 to December 2015, we prospectively enrolled patients with naïve papilla who underwent ERCP at six centers. Patient- and procedure-related variables were recorded on data collection sheets at the time of and after ERCP. Results: A total of 1,191 patients (median age, 71 years) were consecutively enrolled. The overall success rate of biliary cannulation was 96.6%. Overall, 244 patients (20.5%) experienced post-ERCP AEs, including pancreatitis (9.0%), bleeding (11.8%), perforation (0.4%), cholangitis (1.2%), and others (0.9%). While post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) was more common when the procedure was performed by less experienced endoscopists, bleeding was more common in high-volume centers and by less experienced endoscopists. Multivariate analysis showed that a less experience in ERCP was significantly associated with PEP (odds ratio [OR], 1.630; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.050 to 2.531; p=0.030) and post-ERCP bleeding (OR, 1.439; 95% CI, 1.003 to 2.062; p=0.048). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that overall AEs following ERCP were associated with the experience of the endoscopist. To minimize post-ERCP AEs, rigorous training with a sufficient case volume is required, and treatment strategies should be modified according to the endoscopist’s expertise.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Testoni PA, "Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-and low-volume centers and among expert and non-expert operators : a prospective multicenter study" 105 : 1753-1761, 2010

      2 Freeman ML, "Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis : a prospective, multicenter study" 54 : 425-434, 2001

      3 Cheng CL, "Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis : a prospective multicenter study" 101 : 139-147, 2006

      4 Masci E, "Risk factors for pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography : a meta-analysis" 35 : 830-834, 2003

      5 Vandervoort J, "Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP" 56 : 652-656, 2002

      6 Cotton PB, "Risk factors for complications after ERCP : a multivariate analysis of 11, 497 procedures over 12 years" 70 : 80-88, 2009

      7 Williams EJ, "Risk factors for complication following ERCP; results of a large-scale, prospective multicenter study" 39 : 793-801, 2007

      8 Wang P, "Risk factors for ERCP-related complications : a prospective multicenter study" 104 : 31-40, 2009

      9 Kawaguchi Y, "Randomized controlled trial of pancreatic stenting to prevent pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography" 18 : 1635-1641, 2012

      10 Kapral C, "Quality assessment of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography : results of a running nationwide Austrian benchmarking project after 5 years of implementation" 24 : 1447-1454, 2012

      1 Testoni PA, "Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-and low-volume centers and among expert and non-expert operators : a prospective multicenter study" 105 : 1753-1761, 2010

      2 Freeman ML, "Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis : a prospective, multicenter study" 54 : 425-434, 2001

      3 Cheng CL, "Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis : a prospective multicenter study" 101 : 139-147, 2006

      4 Masci E, "Risk factors for pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography : a meta-analysis" 35 : 830-834, 2003

      5 Vandervoort J, "Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP" 56 : 652-656, 2002

      6 Cotton PB, "Risk factors for complications after ERCP : a multivariate analysis of 11, 497 procedures over 12 years" 70 : 80-88, 2009

      7 Williams EJ, "Risk factors for complication following ERCP; results of a large-scale, prospective multicenter study" 39 : 793-801, 2007

      8 Wang P, "Risk factors for ERCP-related complications : a prospective multicenter study" 104 : 31-40, 2009

      9 Kawaguchi Y, "Randomized controlled trial of pancreatic stenting to prevent pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography" 18 : 1635-1641, 2012

      10 Kapral C, "Quality assessment of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography : results of a running nationwide Austrian benchmarking project after 5 years of implementation" 24 : 1447-1454, 2012

      11 Masci E, "Prospective multicenter quality assessment of endotherapy of biliary stones : does center volume matter" 39 : 1076-1081, 2007

      12 ASGE Training Committee, "Principles of training in GI endoscopy" 75 : 231-235, 2012

      13 Glomsaker T, "Patterns and predictive factors of complications after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography" 100 : 373-380, 2013

      14 Enochsson L, "Nationwide, population-based data from 11, 074 ERCP procedures from the Swedish Registry for Gallstone Surgery and ERCP" 72 : 1175-1184, 2010

      15 Stapfer M, "Management of duodenal perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy" 232 : 191-198, 2000

      16 Udd M, "Management of difficult bile duct cannulation in ERCP" 2 : 97-103, 2010

      17 Loperfido S, "Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP : a prospective multicenter study" 48 : 1-10, 1998

      18 Kochar B, "Incidence, severity, and mortality of post-ERCP pancreatitis : a systematic review by using randomized, controlled trials" 81 : 143-149, 2015

      19 Andriulli A, "Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications : a systematic survey of prospective studies" 102 : 1781-1788, 2007

      20 Vitte RL, "Evaluation of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures performed in general hospitals in France" 31 : 740-749, 2007

      21 Classen M, "Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the papilla of Vater and extraction of stones from the choledochal duct(author’s transl)" 99 : 496-497, 1974

      22 Kawai K, "Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the ampulla of Vater" 20 : 148-151, 1974

      23 Rustagi T, "Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related adverse events : general overview" 25 : 97-106, 2015

      24 Galeazzi M, "Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the elderly : results of a retrospective study and a geriatricians’ point of view" 18 : 38-, 2018

      25 문희석, "Education and Training Guidelines for the Board of the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy" 대한소화기내시경학회 50 (50): 345-356, 2017

      26 Siiki A, "ERCP procedures in a Finnish community hospital : a retrospective analysis of 1207 cases" 101 : 45-50, 2012

      27 Petersen BT, "ERCP outcomes : defining the operators, experience, and environments" 55 : 953-958, 2002

      28 Freeman ML, "Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography : avoidance and management" 22 : 567-586, 2012

      29 Freeman ML, "Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy" 335 : 909-918, 1996

      30 Mergener K, "Complications of endoscopic and radiologic investigation of biliary tract disorders" 13 : 173-181, 2011

      31 Masci E, "Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP : a prospective multicenter study" 96 : 417-423, 2001

      32 Kapral C, "Case volume and outcome of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography : results of a nationwide Austrian benchmarking project" 40 : 625-630, 2008

      33 Keswani RN, "Association between endoscopist and center endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography volume with procedure success and adverse outcomes : a systematic review and meta-analysis" 15 : 1866-1875, 2017

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-02-25 학회명변경 한글명 : 거트앤리버 발행위원회 -> 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 KCI등재
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2013-10-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (기타) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 SCIE 등재 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 2.29 0.44 1.5
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.21 1.02 0.46 0.28
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼