RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      개인의료정보 활용 가능성에 대한 비교법적 고찰: 한국과 중국을 중심으로 = Comparative Legal Review on the Utilization Possibility of Personal Medical Information: Focusing on Korea and China

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108767427

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In the era of big data, the medical and industrial worlds are making great efforts to utilize medical information based on various technologies. Of course, it is true that the government has a positive attitude towards the use of information to pionee...

      In the era of big data, the medical and industrial worlds are making great efforts to utilize medical information based on various technologies. Of course, it is true that the government has a positive attitude towards the use of information to pioneer new industrial fields in the era of great change called the 4th Industrial Revolution. However, compared to general personal information, the need for protection is required at a high level in that the degree of damage to the information subject is much greater in case of infringement of medical information. For this reason, the protection and utilization of medical information are often perceived as contradictory or difficult to coexist like two sides of a coin.
      In February 2020, the Personal Information Protection Act was revised, and through this, the contents of ‘pseudonymized information’ were newly established. This is defined as ‘information that cannot identify a specific individual without the use or combination of additional information to restore personal information to its original state by pseudonymizing it’. However, there is a possibility that pseudonymous information can be technically restored as personal information, and in this case, if an infringement of personal information occurs, an issue may be raised about how to solve it. In particular, when pseudonymized medical information is restored, it can cause serious infringement on government entities.
      On the other hand, Korea has been discussing for a long time since the introduction of the right to request transmission in Article 20 of the GDPR of the EU, and the right to request transmission of personal information was newly regulated with the revision of the Personal Information Protection Act in 2023. This right can request companies and institutions that hold their personal information to transfer that information to another place, which is one of the core rights of information subjects necessary to implement My Data. However, if the patient, the subject of information, requests to transmit his or her medical information to another institution, a problem of information leakage may occur.
      In this paper, we look at the provisions of pseudonymous information and the right to request personal information transmission in terms of personal information utilization in our personal information protection law and similar contents in China’s personal information protection law, and try to find implications for the development of our law.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼