요한복음의 율법에 대한 연구 : 율법의 기독론적 이해와 교회론적 이해 중심으로

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is identified to be the soteriological features by that shown in John's theological implications of the law. For a discussion of the law traditionally has been made actively a research of Paul. While the law in John is far not been the subject of a interesring research. But also Law in John is at the center of the debate between Jews and Christians. Jews present a cause that Jesus not be a savior through Law but John’s author present a reason that Jesus is a savior. By this debate, Law has a important role that clarify Johannine community in Gospel.
This thesis researched that devide a christological interests and a ecclesiological. Law in John is understanded the view of christology, Jesus is introduced to Law(Jn 1:45). Thus known that Jesus is Christ through Law. But Law is a cause that a unfaith of Jews(Jn 7:41-42; 12:34). Cause of both side of Law, John’s author contrast Jesus Christ with Moses Law to a revelational dimension(Jn 1:17). Jesus is God of the only begotten in Father, he is well known God and support a perfect revelation to human(Jn 1:18). On contrary, Moses Law is Only an indirect revelation. Also, Jesus is only the way, truth, life as one who is above a limit of Law(Jn 10:18, 30; 14:6). A role of Law is only a guide who is Jesus.
Law is understanded by the view of ecclesiology. Johannine community present by base of a legitimation of Law for a persecution(Jn 15:25). And they are identified as a divine existence, they insist that are a eternal community and glorify community through a basis of Law(Jn 10:34). a commandment that love one another is interested as a new commandment through relationship with Jesus.
This awareness of Law is different with Paul letter that contrast a gospel with a works of Law and Synoptic gospel theology that argued with a ethical Law. The peculiarity of John’s law is due to a context of Johannine community who is expel from Judaism.
John’s author suggest a hope to community who expelled from the synagogue, belong to a social deprivation. Through Law, it is known that Jesus is Christ, themselves reality that persecuted, are a proof which they are not belong to world but are a divine existence. Also who keep Law of Judaism are not a children of God but who keep a new commendment of Jesus are a true children who being as a divine existence.
Like this, through Law, John’s author recommend that stay in Jesus who is only Life to community members who discord for a persecution. At the same time contradict efficiently toward a opponents. Thus I concluded that Law in John is exegetic heartly Christ, defense and secure a identity of Johannine community.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• I. 서론
• A. 연구목적과 중요성 1
• B. 연구범위와 방법 2
• C. 연구사 10
• II. 요한복음 이전의 율법이해
• A. 구약성서의 율법이해 18
• B. 원시 기독교의 율법이해
• 1. 바울 34
• 가. 율법의 기능 35
• 나. 바울의 율법 이해 37
• 2. 공관복음 53
• 가. 마태복음 54
• 나. 마가복음 66
• 다. 누가복음 72
• 3. 기타 신약의 문서들
• 가. 히브리서 77
• 나. 야고보서 83
• III. 요한공동체의 기독론적 율법이해
• A. 긍정적인 율법의 기능과 그리스도 인식
• 1. 그리스도를 증거하는 율법(요1:45) 88
• 2. 예수 그리스도의 행적을 설명하는 율법 113
• B. 부정적인 율법의 기능과 그리스도 인식
• 1. 예수 그리스도와 모세의 율법(요1:17) 118
• 2. 율법 - 불신앙의 원인(요15:25) 134
• C. 율법의 계시적 기능과 이를 초월하는 그리스도 인식
• 1. 예수 그리스도의 성육신과 계시(요1:14) 144
• 2. 율법의 한계를 초월한 예수 그리스도(요10:18,30) 159
• IV. 요한공동체의 교회론적 율법이해
• A. 요한공동체의 신적 기원을 드러내는 율법 173
• 1. 예수와 요한공동체의 신성의 공유(요10:34-35) 174
• 2. 예수와 요한공동체의 신성의 차이(요17:8) 180
• B. 요한공동체의 핍박과 그 율법
• 1. 핍박받는 예수와 율법(요15:25) 192
• 2. 요한공동체의 핍박에 대한 율법적 근거(요19:7) 200
• C. 요한공동체의 사랑의 계명과 율법의 초월(요13:34-35)
• 1. 사랑의 계명과 새 계명 204
• 2. 율법을 초월하는 요한공동체의 사랑의 계명 211
• V. 결론
• A. 요약 및 과제 221
• B. 적용 및 전망 228
• 참고문헌 232
• 영문초록 (Abstract) 244