RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer after Preoperative Chemoradiation in Elderly Patients

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105120319

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: Laparoscopic surgery has been accepted as a standard procedure for colorectal cancer.
      Preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer has some advantages, such as decreased tumor size and lower stage, and lower local recurrence. However, preoperative chemoradiation has the disadvantage of increasing postoperative complication risks. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation in elderly patients.
      Methods: 46 p atients u nderwent l aparoscopic s urgery for rectal c ancer a fter preoperative chemoradiation. Patients were divided into younger (<70 years, n=35) and older groups (≥70 years, n=11).
      Results: In the younger group, men were more predominant (80% vs. 54.5%, p=0.124). In the older group, more patients had high American Society of Anesthesiologists scores (score 3 was 2.9% vs.
      36.4%, p=0.005) than in the younger group. Sphincter-preserving surgery was performed more frequently in the younger group (77.2% vs. 45.5%, p=0.065). Operation time (195.8 min. vs. 212.5 min, p=0.553) and intraoperative blood loss (200.6 cc vs. 209.1 cc, p=0.952) were not significantly different.
      Significant anastomotic leakage was absent in both groups. Postoperative hospital stay was 9.7 and 10.9 days (p=0.669). Complete remission rates were similar in the both groups (8.8% vs. 18.2%, p=0.824).
      Conclusion: Postoperative outcomes are comparable between older group and younger group.
      Laparoscopic surgery could be considered as safe, feasible therapeutic options in elderly patients after preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer. However, large randomized trials with comparative methodologies are needed.
      번역하기

      Purpose: Laparoscopic surgery has been accepted as a standard procedure for colorectal cancer. Preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer has some advantages, such as decreased tumor size and lower stage, and lower local recurrence. However, preop...

      Purpose: Laparoscopic surgery has been accepted as a standard procedure for colorectal cancer.
      Preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer has some advantages, such as decreased tumor size and lower stage, and lower local recurrence. However, preoperative chemoradiation has the disadvantage of increasing postoperative complication risks. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation in elderly patients.
      Methods: 46 p atients u nderwent l aparoscopic s urgery for rectal c ancer a fter preoperative chemoradiation. Patients were divided into younger (<70 years, n=35) and older groups (≥70 years, n=11).
      Results: In the younger group, men were more predominant (80% vs. 54.5%, p=0.124). In the older group, more patients had high American Society of Anesthesiologists scores (score 3 was 2.9% vs.
      36.4%, p=0.005) than in the younger group. Sphincter-preserving surgery was performed more frequently in the younger group (77.2% vs. 45.5%, p=0.065). Operation time (195.8 min. vs. 212.5 min, p=0.553) and intraoperative blood loss (200.6 cc vs. 209.1 cc, p=0.952) were not significantly different.
      Significant anastomotic leakage was absent in both groups. Postoperative hospital stay was 9.7 and 10.9 days (p=0.669). Complete remission rates were similar in the both groups (8.8% vs. 18.2%, p=0.824).
      Conclusion: Postoperative outcomes are comparable between older group and younger group.
      Laparoscopic surgery could be considered as safe, feasible therapeutic options in elderly patients after preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer. However, large randomized trials with comparative methodologies are needed.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Guillou PJ, "Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial" 365 : 1718-1726, 2005

      2 Gultekin FA, "Safety of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in the elderly: results from a nationwide database" 58 : 339-343, 2015

      3 Ishihara S, "Safety and factors contributing to the difficulty of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy" 18 : 247-255, 2014

      4 정덕현, "Safety and Feasibility of a Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Resection in Elderly Patients" 대한대장항문학회 29 (29): 22-27, 2013

      5 Lee WS, "Risk factors and clinical outcoem for anastomotic leakage after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer" 32 : 1124-1129, 2008

      6 Al-Refaie WB, "Operative outcomes beyond 30-day mortality: colorectal cancer surgery in oldest old" 253 : 947-952, 2011

      7 Kang SB, "Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial" 11 : 637-645, 2010

      8 Park JS, "Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal cancer excision:the Korean laparoscopic colorectal surgery study group" 257 : 665-671, 2013

      9 Tan KK, "Long-term outcome following surgery for colorectal cancers in octogenarians: a single institution’s experience of 204 patients" 16 : 1029-1036, 2012

      10 Vallribera Valls F, "Laparoscopyassisted versus open colectomy for treatment of colon cancer in the elderly: morbidity and mortality outcomes in 545 patients" 28 : 3373-3378, 2014

      1 Guillou PJ, "Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial" 365 : 1718-1726, 2005

      2 Gultekin FA, "Safety of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in the elderly: results from a nationwide database" 58 : 339-343, 2015

      3 Ishihara S, "Safety and factors contributing to the difficulty of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy" 18 : 247-255, 2014

      4 정덕현, "Safety and Feasibility of a Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Resection in Elderly Patients" 대한대장항문학회 29 (29): 22-27, 2013

      5 Lee WS, "Risk factors and clinical outcoem for anastomotic leakage after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer" 32 : 1124-1129, 2008

      6 Al-Refaie WB, "Operative outcomes beyond 30-day mortality: colorectal cancer surgery in oldest old" 253 : 947-952, 2011

      7 Kang SB, "Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial" 11 : 637-645, 2010

      8 Park JS, "Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal cancer excision:the Korean laparoscopic colorectal surgery study group" 257 : 665-671, 2013

      9 Tan KK, "Long-term outcome following surgery for colorectal cancers in octogenarians: a single institution’s experience of 204 patients" 16 : 1029-1036, 2012

      10 Vallribera Valls F, "Laparoscopyassisted versus open colectomy for treatment of colon cancer in the elderly: morbidity and mortality outcomes in 545 patients" 28 : 3373-3378, 2014

      11 Grailey K, "Laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection in the elderly population" 27 : 19-30, 2013

      12 Veldkamp R, "Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial" 6 : 477-484, 2005

      13 Fiscon V, "Laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer: matched comparison in elderly and younger patients" 14 : 323-327, 2010

      14 Law WL, "Laparoscopic colorectal resection: a safe option for elderly patients" 195 : 768-773, 2002

      15 Bottino V, "Early outcomes of coonl laparoscopic resection in the elderly patients compared with the younger" 12 (12): S8-, 2012

      16 Frasson M, "Benefits of laparoscopic colorectal resection are more pronounced in elderly patients" 51 : 296-300, 2008

      17 Holm T, "Adjuvant preoperative radiotherapy in patients with rectal carcinoma. Adverse effects during long term follow-up of two randomized trials" 78 : 968-976, 1996

      18 Marijnen CA, "Acute side effects and complications after short-term preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision in primary rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial" 20 : 817-825, 2002

      19 Nelson H, "A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer" 350 : 2050-2059, 2004

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2025 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-07-04 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한내시경복강경외과학회 -> 대한내시경로봇외과학회
      영문명 : Korean Society of Endoscopic & Laparoscopic Surgeons -> The Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery
      KCI등재
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2020-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2018-12-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
      2016-10-12 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한내시경복강경외과학회지 -> Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery KCI등재후보
      2016-08-31 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of the Korean Society of Endoscopic & Laparoscopic Surgeons -> Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery KCI등재후보
      2016-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (기타)
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0 0 0
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0 0 0 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼