RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      아렌트와 소렐의 폭력론 비판 : 대안으로서의 고대 그리스 시민사회 = A Critical Review on the Theories of Violence of Arendt and Sorel: The Ancient Greek Citizen Society as an Alternative

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106418902

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Hannah Arendt defined power as a rightful outcome originated in the agreement of the majority, which is opposite to the violence executed by any arbitrary minority. And d'Entreves justified his concept of ‘legal’, ‘institutionalized’ enforcement, which ceases, according to him, to be actual illegal violence.
      In my opinion, however, it is not enough to say simply that any minority's violence has to be ceased as Arendt did. Instead there should be reflective consideration on the political and social environments which permitted the minority's violence. Above all, there should be reflective consideration on the mechanism of legal, organized military or police power of the modern state, which causes the minority's violence to be actualized. ‘Legal’ or ‘institutionalized’ power does not guarantee justness. To the contrary, legality itself could motivate inequality.
      Furthermore, un-politically, biologically and individually committed violence has to be differentiated from the violence executed by social, institutionally organized power. This is why, if these two kinds of violence are confused so as to be equivalently dealt with, we lose the opportunity to reflect upon the evil practices of social violence committed by the authority of law or organized military power, and unjust violence committed by the minority as well, the very things which happened to promote social inequality.
      On the other hand, in contrast to Arendt whose argument concerned the antithesis of the rightful power of the majority and the unjust violence of the minority, G. Sorel criticized the concentrative power of the modern state, and supported the movement of ‘syndicalism’ of the laborers as an alternative. In my opinion, however, his ‘syndicalism’ turns into nothing more than a dream under the centralized mechanism of power. This could only be properly operated within a very decentralized structure, and the latter does not refer only to decentralization of political organization, but also to the intensification of each citizen's rights. A decentralized structure could only be actualized by restraining the violence committed by every kind of organized social power, military or police, under the authority of law. And the dispersion of power has to be extended down to the level of each citizen, who regards best his own interests first. From this point of view, the citizen state of ancient Greece has to be reconsidered as an alternative.
      The ancient Greek city-state which granted free citizenship did not have a central government, with neither military nor police forces being organized. It is a kind of sophistry to argue that the modern state is bigger in scale than the ancient Greek city-state, so that direct democracy does not apply to the modern situation: the key point does not concern the scale but its power structure. Indeed it is not only a false recognition, but tends to distort the essence of the problem to suppose that citizens enjoyed liberty by the exploitation of slave's labor, or that the women were subject to the men, so that the Greek states were not a really democratic societies. The social classes of citizenship and slave were not absolutely exclusive, but could be alternated with each other. And women also enjoyed citizenship, as they had socal and economic rights in the decentralized Greek society.
      번역하기

      Hannah Arendt defined power as a rightful outcome originated in the agreement of the majority, which is opposite to the violence executed by any arbitrary minority. And d'Entreves justified his concept of ‘legal’, ‘institutionalized’ enforceme...

      Hannah Arendt defined power as a rightful outcome originated in the agreement of the majority, which is opposite to the violence executed by any arbitrary minority. And d'Entreves justified his concept of ‘legal’, ‘institutionalized’ enforcement, which ceases, according to him, to be actual illegal violence.
      In my opinion, however, it is not enough to say simply that any minority's violence has to be ceased as Arendt did. Instead there should be reflective consideration on the political and social environments which permitted the minority's violence. Above all, there should be reflective consideration on the mechanism of legal, organized military or police power of the modern state, which causes the minority's violence to be actualized. ‘Legal’ or ‘institutionalized’ power does not guarantee justness. To the contrary, legality itself could motivate inequality.
      Furthermore, un-politically, biologically and individually committed violence has to be differentiated from the violence executed by social, institutionally organized power. This is why, if these two kinds of violence are confused so as to be equivalently dealt with, we lose the opportunity to reflect upon the evil practices of social violence committed by the authority of law or organized military power, and unjust violence committed by the minority as well, the very things which happened to promote social inequality.
      On the other hand, in contrast to Arendt whose argument concerned the antithesis of the rightful power of the majority and the unjust violence of the minority, G. Sorel criticized the concentrative power of the modern state, and supported the movement of ‘syndicalism’ of the laborers as an alternative. In my opinion, however, his ‘syndicalism’ turns into nothing more than a dream under the centralized mechanism of power. This could only be properly operated within a very decentralized structure, and the latter does not refer only to decentralization of political organization, but also to the intensification of each citizen's rights. A decentralized structure could only be actualized by restraining the violence committed by every kind of organized social power, military or police, under the authority of law. And the dispersion of power has to be extended down to the level of each citizen, who regards best his own interests first. From this point of view, the citizen state of ancient Greece has to be reconsidered as an alternative.
      The ancient Greek city-state which granted free citizenship did not have a central government, with neither military nor police forces being organized. It is a kind of sophistry to argue that the modern state is bigger in scale than the ancient Greek city-state, so that direct democracy does not apply to the modern situation: the key point does not concern the scale but its power structure. Indeed it is not only a false recognition, but tends to distort the essence of the problem to suppose that citizens enjoyed liberty by the exploitation of slave's labor, or that the women were subject to the men, so that the Greek states were not a really democratic societies. The social classes of citizenship and slave were not absolutely exclusive, but could be alternated with each other. And women also enjoyed citizenship, as they had socal and economic rights in the decentralized Greek society.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Arendt, Hannah, "폭력의 세기" 이후 1999

      2 Sorel, Goerges, "폭력에 대한 성찰" 도서출판 나남 2007

      3 Arendt, Hannah, "인간의 조건" 한길사 1996

      4 Clemenceau, Georges, "여명 (L'Aurore)" 1905

      5 최자영, "고대 동부 지중해 세계의 시민병·용병·상비(의무)병의 사회·정치적 의미 분석" 한국서양고대역사문화학회 (37) : 39-69, 2014

      6 최자영, "고대 그리스 법제사" 아카넷 2007

      7 Mills, Wright, "The Power Elite" 1956

      8 Richter, D.C, "The Position of Women in Classical Athens" 67 : 1971

      9 Trail, J.S., "The Organization of Attica : A Study of the Demes, Trittys, and the Phylai, and their Representation in the Athenian Coucil" 1975

      10 d'Entréves, Alexander Passerin, "The Notion of the State: An Introduction to Political Theory" 1967

      1 Arendt, Hannah, "폭력의 세기" 이후 1999

      2 Sorel, Goerges, "폭력에 대한 성찰" 도서출판 나남 2007

      3 Arendt, Hannah, "인간의 조건" 한길사 1996

      4 Clemenceau, Georges, "여명 (L'Aurore)" 1905

      5 최자영, "고대 동부 지중해 세계의 시민병·용병·상비(의무)병의 사회·정치적 의미 분석" 한국서양고대역사문화학회 (37) : 39-69, 2014

      6 최자영, "고대 그리스 법제사" 아카넷 2007

      7 Mills, Wright, "The Power Elite" 1956

      8 Richter, D.C, "The Position of Women in Classical Athens" 67 : 1971

      9 Trail, J.S., "The Organization of Attica : A Study of the Demes, Trittys, and the Phylai, and their Representation in the Athenian Coucil" 1975

      10 d'Entréves, Alexander Passerin, "The Notion of the State: An Introduction to Political Theory" 1967

      11 Aischines, "Scholia"

      12 Deming, Barbara, "Revolution and Nonviolent" 1968

      13 de Jouvenel, Bertrand, "Power: The Natural History of Its Growth" 1952

      14 Aristoteles, "Politika (Politics)"

      15 Finer, S.E, "Pareto and Pluto-Democracy: the retreat to Galapagos" 1968

      16 Bell, Daniel, "Notes on the Post-Industrial Society" (6) : 1967

      17 Xenophon, "Memorabilia"

      18 "Lysias"

      19 Frédéric Le Play, "L'Organisation du travail" Tours 1870

      20 "Isokrates"

      21 "Inscriptiones Creticai, 4vols. Roma, 1935~1950"

      22 "IG (Inscriptiones Graecae)"

      23 Xenophon, "Hiero"

      24 Euripides, "Hellene"

      25 Pomeroy, S.B., "Goddesses, Whores, Wives and Slaves: Women in classical Antiquity" 1975

      26 Weber, Max, "Gesammelte Politische Schriften" 396-450, 1921

      27 "Dion Chrysostomos"

      28 "Demosthenes"

      29 "Carystios"

      30 "Athenaios"

      31 Aristoteles, "Athenaion Politeia (Athenian Constitution)"

      32 Bekker, "Anecdota Graeca"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-06-29 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Association For The Western Ancient History -> THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE WESTERN ANCIENT HISTORY AND CULTURE KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.27 0.27 0.19
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.2 0.2 0.655 0.09
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼