저작권법상 공공저작물 자유이용 규정에 대한 검토 = Legal Issue on the Free Use of Public work as Limitation on Author's Property Right

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Recently Copyright act concerning public works has been revised so public work can be used freely by all people. The rights of the copyright holder recognized by copyright law essentially assume the cost for creative incentives. The assumption is based on the concept of compensation equivalent to the creation, rather than available shares (public domain) all things. However, public works are naturally acquired in the course of the administration for the purpose of achieving administration not have been recognized as a tool of creative incentives. Thus, it is not right to grant equally comprehensive and exclusive rights by copyright laws on public works. In particular, the reason to provide the strict procedures and conditions of the use of state-owned property in the State Property Act is not to cause trouble to perform public purposes, and not to be a privilege for the licensee.
Public works used by others except the case of administrative confidential or privacy infringement do not interfere with the conduct of public purpose, and can not be used exclusively. Thus, it is not reasonable to follow strictly principles of state-owned property. It makes sense that free use doctrine is the governing principle in the case of the use of these public works, not the rule of 'license' or 'contract'.
According to that principle, Copyright act adopt the rule of free use of public work as limitation on author's property right. However that legislation has some limitations such as the range of application, process for free use of public work, etc. Legislation concerning public works should be improved in the direction of the management and increasing its effectiveness, and the rule on the 'use' of public works should be based on that citizens can actively utilize.
This thesis deprives these principles for public works and suggests the directions for legislation. First, it is necessary to greatly expand the range of works that are not protected by copyright law, including works that public officials of state agencies or local government officials created or acquired in the process of their job creation.
Second, another legislation is needed to implement comprehensively legislative principles for public works. Whether or not an exclusive right of the state to public works, legislation for systematic management of public works is necessary. If people who want to use public works should consult various ministries or public institutions to use the works, it is clearly against the 'free and fair use' doctrine. It is difficult to expect public agencies active measurements to ensure the compliance of public authorities. In addition to these systematic problems, resolution for conflicts between statutes should be reflected in laws. Detailed provisions for copyright registration and identifying each of these relationships need to be prepared. Unified administration for public works is also needed. Clarifying the role and functions of the responsible agencies and the cooperation obligations of other state agencies should be provided.
Finally, the reliable management system and specific norms that people can take advantage of public works should be established. It is necessary to develop the procedures for the use of public works from the perspective of users as well as public agencies which acquire and manage the information.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 공공저작물의 법적 성격
• Ⅲ. 개정 저작권법 의의와 주요내용
• Ⅳ. 공공저작물 자유이용 규정의 재검토
• Ⅴ. 결론
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김현경, "헌법상 재산권 보장과 저작재산권 제한규정의 정합성에 관한 연구" 계간 저작권 26 (2) : 107 ~ 135, 2013

2 송영식, "지적소유권법(상)" 육법사, 2005

3 강남훈, "정보재 가치논쟁" 한신대학교 출판부, 2007

4 "전자정부법"

5 신동룡, "저작권법에 있어서 2차적 저작권의 사건성 －미학적 표현주의와 신고전파 경제이론을 중심으로－" 법학연구 19 (1) : 185 ~ 218, 2009

6 이형하, "저작권법상의 자유이용" 재판자료집 57, 1992

7 이대희, "저작권법상의 공정이용의 법리에 관한 비교법적 연구" 경영법률 10, 2000

8 "문화체육관광부고시 제 2013-7 호" 2013

9 채명기, "데이터베이스의 추가보호" 저작권심의조정위원회, 2000

10 김민호, "국유재산의 효율적 관리ㆍ활용방안" 2001

11 "국가재정법"

12 배대헌, "공공정보, 공익에서 공유(public domain)로 옷을 갈아입다 - 공공정보의 활용을 위한 저작물 공유 문제 검토" IT와 법연구 (5) : 1 ~ 31, 2011

13 김현경, "공공저작물의 활용을 위한 입법론적 고찰" 성균관법학 25 (1) : 195 ~ 226, 2013

14 배대헌, "공공저작물․공공정보의 이용과 관련한 최근의 논의내용 검토" 계간 저작권 25 (1) : 99 ~ 127, 2012

15 김혜창, "공공저작물 저작권행사 제한" 제 2 회 공유저작물 창조자원화 공개포럼, 2012

16 "공공데이터의 제공 및 이용활성화에 관한 법률" 2014

17 시귀선, "공공기록물의 이용과 저작권보호에 관한 연구" 한국기록관리학회지 9 (2) : 159 ~ 188, 2009

18 이헌묵, "공공기관이 보유하고 있는 저작물의 자유이용허락에 관한 법제도 연구" 문화미디어엔터테인먼트법 5 (1) : 49 ~ 73, 2011

19 村井麻衣子, "デヅタルㆍコソテソツ法のパラダイム" 雄松堂出版, 2008

20 Stephen Breyer, "The Uneasy Case for Copyright : A Study of Copyright in Books, Photocopies, and Computer Programs" Harv. L. Rev. 84 : 281 ~, 1970

21 Alfred C. Yen, "Restoring the Natural Law: Copyright as Labor and Possession" Ohio St. L. J. 517 51 : 517 ~, 1990

22 William W. Fisher III, "Reconstructing the Fair Use Doctrine" Harv. L. Rev. 101 : 1659 ~, 1988

23 Thomas Rogers, "Fair Use in the U.S. Economy" Computer & Communications Industry Association, 2010

24 Computer & Communication Industry Association, "Economic Contribution of Industries Relaying on Fair Use" CCIA, 2006

25 Paul Goldstein, "Copyright, vol. Ⅰ" Little Brown Company, 1999

26 Julie E. Cohen, "Copyright and the Perfect Curve" Vanderbilt L. Rev. 53 : 180 ~ 184, 2000

27 Neil Netanel, "Copyright Alienability Restrictions and the Enhancement of Author Autonomy ; A Normative Evalution" Rutgers L. J (24) : 315 ~ 316, 1993

28 Mark Rose, "Authors and Owners : The Invention of Copyright" Harvard Univ. Press, 1993

29 Wendy J. Gorden, "An Inquiry into the Merits of Copyright : The Challenges of Consistency, Consent, and Encouragement Theory" Stan. L. Rev 41 : 1343 ~, 1989

30 William M. Landes, "An Economic Analysis of Copyright Law" J. Legal Stud 18, 1989

31 Wendy Gordon, "A Property Right in Self-Expression : Equality and Individual in the Natural Law of Intellectual Property" Yale L. J. 102, 1993

32 허희성, "2000 신저작권법 축조해설 ( 상 )" 저작권아카데미, 2000