RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      영국 경험주의 취미론의 최종점: 흄과 버크의 취미 이해 = The Culmination of British Taste Theories: Taste Theories of Hume and Burke

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108403177

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In this essay, I examine David Hume’s (1711-1776) and Edmund Burke’s (1729-1797) discourses on taste to argue that their contrasting standpoints on taste suggest the culminating point of the British Empiricist discussions about taste. Both philosophers similarly take the empirical method that abstracts the general principles of taste by observing the particular phenomena of aesthetic experiences and taste judgments but the goals of their inquiries are almost opposite to each other. In “Of the Standard of Taste (1757),” Hume seeks to propose a practical standard of taste that could save us from acquiescing a skeptical view on taste that endorses “the natural equality of tastes” while admitting the variety of subjective taste. In contrast, Burke’s “On Taste (1759)” argues for “the uniformity of taste” by pointing out the same substratum of our physical senses under subjective tastes that might appear variable. The process of making taste judgments, which consists of causal relation, sheds different light on this contrast between the two philosophers’ approaches to taste. While Hume focuses on taste sentiments, the final effect of this process, to admit the variety of individual tastes, Burke relies on the first cause of physical senses to advocate the uniformity of taste. This process also lets us understand the preceding taste theories as figuring out the faculty of taste, located in the middle of that process. This overview demonstrates that the British empiricists have taken the most important stages in the process of taste judgments as their theoretical cornerstones. If so, because there would be no more central points to examine taste phenomena, we can assume that no further significant development is available in their attempt to explicate taste.
      번역하기

      In this essay, I examine David Hume’s (1711-1776) and Edmund Burke’s (1729-1797) discourses on taste to argue that their contrasting standpoints on taste suggest the culminating point of the British Empiricist discussions about taste. Both philoso...

      In this essay, I examine David Hume’s (1711-1776) and Edmund Burke’s (1729-1797) discourses on taste to argue that their contrasting standpoints on taste suggest the culminating point of the British Empiricist discussions about taste. Both philosophers similarly take the empirical method that abstracts the general principles of taste by observing the particular phenomena of aesthetic experiences and taste judgments but the goals of their inquiries are almost opposite to each other. In “Of the Standard of Taste (1757),” Hume seeks to propose a practical standard of taste that could save us from acquiescing a skeptical view on taste that endorses “the natural equality of tastes” while admitting the variety of subjective taste. In contrast, Burke’s “On Taste (1759)” argues for “the uniformity of taste” by pointing out the same substratum of our physical senses under subjective tastes that might appear variable. The process of making taste judgments, which consists of causal relation, sheds different light on this contrast between the two philosophers’ approaches to taste. While Hume focuses on taste sentiments, the final effect of this process, to admit the variety of individual tastes, Burke relies on the first cause of physical senses to advocate the uniformity of taste. This process also lets us understand the preceding taste theories as figuring out the faculty of taste, located in the middle of that process. This overview demonstrates that the British empiricists have taken the most important stages in the process of taste judgments as their theoretical cornerstones. If so, because there would be no more central points to examine taste phenomena, we can assume that no further significant development is available in their attempt to explicate taste.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference) 논문관계도

      1 최도빈, "흄의 미학 사상 연구 : '취미의 기준'을 중심으로" 서울대학교 대학원 2006

      2 최도빈, "흄 ‘덕의 기준’에 대하여" 철학사상연구소 (67) : 61-92, 2018

      3 김채연, "신경미학의 현황-발전과 전망" 한국인지및생물심리학회 27 (27): 341-365, 2015

      4 정혜윤, "신경미학, 무엇이 문제인가?" 한국미학회 82 (82): 235-282, 2016

      5 Burke, Edmund, "숭고와 아름다움 관념의 기원에 대한 철학적탐구" 마티 2007

      6 김한결, "미학대계 I" 서울대학교 출판부 2008

      7 Shelley, James, "The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2020 Edition)" 2020

      8 Addison, Joseph, "The Spectator (no. 409, 412)" Routledge 1891

      9 Korsgaard, Christine M., "The General Point of View: Love and Moral Approval in Hume’s Ethics" 25 (25): 3-42, 1999

      10 Herdt, Jennifer, "Religion and Faction in Hume’s Moral Philosophy" Cambridge University Press 2008

      1 최도빈, "흄의 미학 사상 연구 : '취미의 기준'을 중심으로" 서울대학교 대학원 2006

      2 최도빈, "흄 ‘덕의 기준’에 대하여" 철학사상연구소 (67) : 61-92, 2018

      3 김채연, "신경미학의 현황-발전과 전망" 한국인지및생물심리학회 27 (27): 341-365, 2015

      4 정혜윤, "신경미학, 무엇이 문제인가?" 한국미학회 82 (82): 235-282, 2016

      5 Burke, Edmund, "숭고와 아름다움 관념의 기원에 대한 철학적탐구" 마티 2007

      6 김한결, "미학대계 I" 서울대학교 출판부 2008

      7 Shelley, James, "The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2020 Edition)" 2020

      8 Addison, Joseph, "The Spectator (no. 409, 412)" Routledge 1891

      9 Korsgaard, Christine M., "The General Point of View: Love and Moral Approval in Hume’s Ethics" 25 (25): 3-42, 1999

      10 Herdt, Jennifer, "Religion and Faction in Hume’s Moral Philosophy" Cambridge University Press 2008

      11 Choi, Dobin, "Moral Artisanship in Mengzi 6A7" 18 (18): 331-348, 2018

      12 Wieand, Jeffrey, "Hume’s Two Standards of Taste" 34 (34): 129-142, 1984

      13 Levinson, Jerrold, "Hume’s Standard of Taste: The Real Problem" 60 (60): 227-238, 2002

      14 Shelley, James, "Hume’s Double Standard of Taste" 52 (52): 437-445, 1994

      15 Hahn, Susan, "How Can a Sceptic Have a Standard of Taste?" 53 (53): 379-392, 2013

      16 Hume, David, "Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary" Liberty Fund 1985

      17 Gerard, Alexander, "An Essay on Taste"

      18 Hume, David, "An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals: A Critical Edition" Oxford University Press 1998

      19 Hume, David, "An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding" Oxford University Press 1999

      20 Costelloe, Timothy M., "Aesthetics and Morals in the Philosophy of David Hume" Routledge 2007

      21 Hume, David, "A Treatise of Human Nature" Oxford University Press 2000

      22 Burke, Edmund, "A Philosophical Enquiry into the Sublime and Beautiful" Oxford University Press 1998

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼