한국어 부정 유형에 따른 전제 의미의 심리적 실재성

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In this paper, we investigated the psychological reality on the presupposition projections of the long and short form negation in Korean, using the presupposition trigger ‘tto’. It has been argued that while the long-form negation allows both presuppositions of which the contents are positive and negative, the short-form negation does only the negative presupposition. However, there are few empirical studies on this issue based on experimental methods. To explore the presupposition processing in Korean with these methods, we conducted two experiments where the participants were asked to complete fragmented sentences and judge acceptability on them using the given context information. The results showed that the participants do allow negative presupposition for the long-form negation while it is unlikely that the negative one could be permitted for the short form negation. Moreover, the participants prefer negative presupposition to positive presupposition on the long-form negation that bears ambiguity given that the negation yields both positive and negative presupposition. The mixed-effects regression models revealed that the types of negation effect in both sentence completion and acceptability judgment tasks, the effect of the context, and the interaction effect between the context and the types of negation were significant the acceptability judgment task. Taken together, our results confirmed that those Korean presupposition projections could be recognized and represented as previously predicted by the past theoretical studies, thereby showing the psychological reality of these pragmatic phenomena in Korean speakers.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 서론
• 2. 전제 유발자와 전제투사 문제
• 3. 한국어 “또” 전제에 대한 실험 연구
• 4. 논의 및 결론
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박철우, "부정의 작용역에 대하여" 한국어학회 61 : 145-171, 2013

2 임홍빈, "국어 부정문의 통사와 의미" 10 : 72-99, 1987

3 박종갑, "국어 부정문의 중의성에 대하여(1)" 한민족어문학회 (38) : 163-184, 2001

4 具鍾南, "국어 부정문 연구" 全北大學校 大學院 1992

5 윤재학, "‘다시’와 ‘또’" 한국언어정보학회 11 (11): 1-22, 2007

6 고영근, "[단행본] 우리말 문법론" 집문당 2008

7 Clark, Herbert H, "Using Language" Cambridge University Press 1996

8 Gibbs R, "The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics" Oxford University Press 310-198, 2019

9 Geurts, Bart, "The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics" Oxford University Press 180-198, 2019

10 Langedoen, Terence, "Studies in Linguistic Semantics" Holt, Reinhardt and Winston 373-388, 1971

11 Stalnaker, Robert, "Semantics and Philosophy" New York University Press 197-214, 1972

12 Fodor, Jerry A, "Representations" MIT Press 1981

13 Christensen, R. H. B, "R package vignette version 2019" 12-10, 2019

14 Jouravlev, Olessia, "Processing temporal presuppositions: An event related potential study" 31 (31): 1245-1256, 2016

15 Chemla, Emmanuel, "Processing presuppositions: Dynamic semantics vs pragmatic enrichment" 28 (28): 241-260, 2010

16 Karttunen, Lauri, "Presuppositions of Compound Sentences" 4 : 167-193, 1973

17 Abbot, Barbara, "Presuppositions as nonassertions" 32 (32): 1419-1437, 2000

18 van der Sandt, Rob, "Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution" 9 : 333-377, 1992

19 Schwarz, Florian, "Presupposition Projection in Online Processing" 34 (34): 61-106, 2017

20 Levinson, Stephen, "Pragmatics" Cambridge University Press 1983

21 Huang, Yang, "Pragmatics" Oxford University Press 2007

22 Heim, Irene, "On the projection problem for presuppositions" Stanford University 114-126, 1983

23 Strawson, Peter, "On referring" 59 : 320-344, 1950

24 Russell, Bertrand, "On Denoting" 14 : 479-493, 1905

25 Baayen, Harald, "Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items" 59 (59): 390-412, 2008

26 Schwarz, Florian, "Logic, language and meaning Vol. 7218" Springer 200-209, 2012

27 Frege, Gottlob, "Frege: collected works" Basil Black well 157-177, 1892

28 Kamp, Hans, "Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Mathematical Tract 135" Mathematisch Centrum 277-322, 1981

29 Bates, Douglas, "Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4" 67 (67): 1-48, 2015

30 Rayner, Keith, "Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of researchm" 124 (124): 372-422, 1998

31 Noveck, Ira, "Experimental Pragmatics: The Making of a Cognitive Science" Cambridge University Press 2018

32 Noveck, Ira, "Experimental Pragmatics" Palgrave MacMillan 2004

33 Schwarz, Florian, "Experimental Perspectives on Presuppositions (Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics)" Springer International Publishing 2015

34 Gelman, Andrew, "Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models" Cambridge University Press 2007

35 Bara, Bruno G., "Cognitive Pragmatics: The Mental Processes of Communication" Cambridge University Press 2010

36 Agresti, Alan, "Categorical Data Analysis" John Wiley and Sons, Inc 2002

37 Matuschek, Hannes, "Balancing Type I Error and Power in Linear Mixed Models" 94 : 305-315, 2017

38 Schlenker, Philippe, "Anti-dynamics: Presupposition projection without dynamic semantics" 16 (16): 325-356, 2007

39 Baayen, Harald, "Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics using R" Cambridge University Press 2008

40 Christensen, R. H. B, "Analysis of sensory ratings data with cumulative link models" 154 (154): 58-79, 2013