RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      The Personality of Luxury Fashion Brands

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82435310

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The focus of brand differentiation is shifting increasingly to symbolic benefits mainly because of changing market conditions and consumer preferences. On the one hand, the functional benefits of many products on the market today become increasingly equivalent and exchangeable. On the other hand, an increasing number of consumers engage in symbolic consumption and decide for a product mainly due to the congruity between their personality and the symbolic personality of the product or brand. These trends lead to an increased interest in the brand personality concept, which offers a systematic approach to create symbolic benefits. Although luxury brands are characterised with strong symbolic benefits that often even exceed their functional benefits and that refer to a large extent to human personality traits, there exists only a small literature base about the
      symbolic meaning of luxury brands and no specific brand personality framework. This paper sets a foundation for a luxury brand personality framework with an investigation of personality traits as the basic elements of a brand personality. More specifically, its objective is to uncover the entire universe of personality traits that luxury brands represent in the eyes of their consumers based on two empirical studies. These studies focus on luxury fashion brands as this industry covers the biggest variety of brand images. As a prerequisite, this paper defines luxury brands as the objects of investigation, explains the concept of brand personality and its common research methodology and outlines the requirements and selection criteria for luxury brand personality traits. The brand personality refers to the set of human characteristics associated with a brand. Aaker developed the most established theoretical framework of brand personality dimensions and a scale to measure them by drawing on research about the Big Five human personality dimensions. More than 600 U.S. respondents rated on a five-point Likert scale a subset of 37 general brands of varying categories on 114 personality traits. Aaker consolidated the personality traits by factor analyses to five distinct dimensions. This paper
      proposes a research methodology specifically for the investigation of luxury brand personality traits. It builds on a consumer-oriented qualitative approach using the repertory grid method (RGM), which is constrained by a conceptual framework of guidelines and selection criteria, but remains flexible enough to consider the ambiguous and contextual aspects of brand personality. While the quantitative approach requires deleting ambiguous and contextual traits that load on multiple factors, RGM allows respondents to describe constructs with a group of words and enables researchers to decode their varying contextual meanings for different
      constructs. In addition, RGM matches the consumer-orientation in brand management as the resulting sets of traits and brands originate directly from the respondents. A major modification to the common research approach is that each trait has to consist of three adjectives. While a single adjective can be very ambiguous, word combinations become more precise as people can rely on their overlapping meaning. The first study covers in-depth interviews with about 50 luxury consumers about their associations with luxury brands according to the RGM and led to a set of 49 personality traits and five major personality dimensions. These dimensions
      include modernity, eccentricity, opulence, elitism, and strength. Modernity describes the temporal perspective of a brand, which can lie either in the past or in the present or future. Eccentricity describes the level of discrepancy from social norms and expectations. Opulence refers to the level of conspicuousness of the symbols of wealth. These symbols cover a wide range of associations including ostentatious logos and valuable materials.
      번역하기

      The focus of brand differentiation is shifting increasingly to symbolic benefits mainly because of changing market conditions and consumer preferences. On the one hand, the functional benefits of many products on the market today become increasingly e...

      The focus of brand differentiation is shifting increasingly to symbolic benefits mainly because of changing market conditions and consumer preferences. On the one hand, the functional benefits of many products on the market today become increasingly equivalent and exchangeable. On the other hand, an increasing number of consumers engage in symbolic consumption and decide for a product mainly due to the congruity between their personality and the symbolic personality of the product or brand. These trends lead to an increased interest in the brand personality concept, which offers a systematic approach to create symbolic benefits. Although luxury brands are characterised with strong symbolic benefits that often even exceed their functional benefits and that refer to a large extent to human personality traits, there exists only a small literature base about the
      symbolic meaning of luxury brands and no specific brand personality framework. This paper sets a foundation for a luxury brand personality framework with an investigation of personality traits as the basic elements of a brand personality. More specifically, its objective is to uncover the entire universe of personality traits that luxury brands represent in the eyes of their consumers based on two empirical studies. These studies focus on luxury fashion brands as this industry covers the biggest variety of brand images. As a prerequisite, this paper defines luxury brands as the objects of investigation, explains the concept of brand personality and its common research methodology and outlines the requirements and selection criteria for luxury brand personality traits. The brand personality refers to the set of human characteristics associated with a brand. Aaker developed the most established theoretical framework of brand personality dimensions and a scale to measure them by drawing on research about the Big Five human personality dimensions. More than 600 U.S. respondents rated on a five-point Likert scale a subset of 37 general brands of varying categories on 114 personality traits. Aaker consolidated the personality traits by factor analyses to five distinct dimensions. This paper
      proposes a research methodology specifically for the investigation of luxury brand personality traits. It builds on a consumer-oriented qualitative approach using the repertory grid method (RGM), which is constrained by a conceptual framework of guidelines and selection criteria, but remains flexible enough to consider the ambiguous and contextual aspects of brand personality. While the quantitative approach requires deleting ambiguous and contextual traits that load on multiple factors, RGM allows respondents to describe constructs with a group of words and enables researchers to decode their varying contextual meanings for different
      constructs. In addition, RGM matches the consumer-orientation in brand management as the resulting sets of traits and brands originate directly from the respondents. A major modification to the common research approach is that each trait has to consist of three adjectives. While a single adjective can be very ambiguous, word combinations become more precise as people can rely on their overlapping meaning. The first study covers in-depth interviews with about 50 luxury consumers about their associations with luxury brands according to the RGM and led to a set of 49 personality traits and five major personality dimensions. These dimensions
      include modernity, eccentricity, opulence, elitism, and strength. Modernity describes the temporal perspective of a brand, which can lie either in the past or in the present or future. Eccentricity describes the level of discrepancy from social norms and expectations. Opulence refers to the level of conspicuousness of the symbols of wealth. These symbols cover a wide range of associations including ostentatious logos and valuable materials.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. Introduction
      • 2. Conceptual Groundwork
      • 3. Study I: Identification of Personality Traitsusing the Repertory Grid Method
      • 4. Study II: Discussion of Luxury Brand PrintAdverts
      • 5. Conclusions
      • 1. Introduction
      • 2. Conceptual Groundwork
      • 3. Study I: Identification of Personality Traitsusing the Repertory Grid Method
      • 4. Study II: Discussion of Luxury Brand PrintAdverts
      • 5. Conclusions
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Eden, C., "Using repertory grids for problem construction" 35 (35): 779-790, 1984

      2 Heine, K., "Using personal and online repertory grid methods for the development of a luxury brand personality" 7 (7): 25-38, 2009

      3 Schwartz, S. H., "Universals in the content and structure of values : theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries" 25 (25): 1-65, 1992

      4 Vickers, J. S., "The marketing of luxury goods : An exploratory study – three conceptual dimensions" 3 (3): 459-478, 2003

      5 Dubois, B., "The market for luxury goods : Income versus culture" 27 (27): 34-44, 1993

      6 John, O. P., "The lexical approach to personality: a historic review of trait taxonomy research" (2) : 171-203, 1988

      7 Siguaw, J. A., "The brand personality scale : an application for restaurants" 6 : 48-55, 1999

      8 Kelly, G. A., "The Psychology of Personal Constructs" W. W. Norton & Company 1955

      9 Kapferer, J. N., "The New Strategic Brand Management" Kogan Page 2008

      10 Mutscheller, P. M., "Success Factors and Milestones in the Luxury Goods Universe" Universiätsverlag Konstanz. 1992

      1 Eden, C., "Using repertory grids for problem construction" 35 (35): 779-790, 1984

      2 Heine, K., "Using personal and online repertory grid methods for the development of a luxury brand personality" 7 (7): 25-38, 2009

      3 Schwartz, S. H., "Universals in the content and structure of values : theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries" 25 (25): 1-65, 1992

      4 Vickers, J. S., "The marketing of luxury goods : An exploratory study – three conceptual dimensions" 3 (3): 459-478, 2003

      5 Dubois, B., "The market for luxury goods : Income versus culture" 27 (27): 34-44, 1993

      6 John, O. P., "The lexical approach to personality: a historic review of trait taxonomy research" (2) : 171-203, 1988

      7 Siguaw, J. A., "The brand personality scale : an application for restaurants" 6 : 48-55, 1999

      8 Kelly, G. A., "The Psychology of Personal Constructs" W. W. Norton & Company 1955

      9 Kapferer, J. N., "The New Strategic Brand Management" Kogan Page 2008

      10 Mutscheller, P. M., "Success Factors and Milestones in the Luxury Goods Universe" Universiätsverlag Konstanz. 1992

      11 Esch, F. R., "Strategie und Technik der Markenführung" Vahlen 2008

      12 Vigneron, F., "Review and a conceptual framework of prestige-seeking consumer behavior" 3 (3): 1999

      13 Fisher, R., "Removing social desirability bias with indirect questioning: Is the cure worse than the disease?" 25 (25): 563-567, 1998

      14 Haire, M., "Projective techniques in marketing research" 14 (14): 649-656, 1950

      15 Heine, K., "Practicable Value-Cascade Positioning of Luxury Fashion Brands" 2010

      16 Mäder, R., "Messung und Steuerung von Markenpersönlichkeit: Entwicklung eines Messinstruments und Anwendung in der Werbung mit prominenten Testimonials" Gabler 2005

      17 Vigneron, F., "Measuring perceptions of brand luxury" 11 : 484-506, 2004

      18 Kisabaka, L., "Marketing für Luxusprodukte" Fördergesellschaft Produkt-Marketing 2001

      19 Lipovetsky, G., "Le Luxe Éternel: De l’âge du sacré au temps des marques" Éditions Gallimard 2003

      20 Reynolds, T. J., "Laddering theory, method, analysis, and interpretation" 28 (28): 11-31, 1988

      21 Vernier, E., "La Banalisation Du Luxe" Université du Littoral Côte d’Opale 2006

      22 Fromm, M., "Introduction to the Repertory Grid Interview" Waxmann 2004

      23 Heine, K., "Identification and Motivation of Participants for Luxury Consumer Surveys" 2010

      24 John, O.P., "Handbook of Personality" The Guilford Press 1999

      25 Ourahmoune, N., "Gender values and brand communication: the transfer of masculine representations to brand narratives" 8 : 181-188, 2008

      26 Esteve, G., "Etude d'une stratégie du luxe – Stratégie de Dior"

      27 Mayring, P., "Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung" Beltz 2002

      28 Aaker, J. L., "Dimensions of brand personality" 34 (34): 347-356, 1997

      29 Valtin, A., "Der Wert von Luxusmarken" Gabler Edition Wissenschaft 2004

      30 Durgee, J. F., "Depth-interview techniques for creative advertising" 25 (25): 29-37, 1986

      31 Trommsdorff, V., "Das Marketing von luxusprodukten" 37 : 1669-1674, 2008

      32 Dubois, B., "Consumer segments based on attitudes toward luxury : empirical evidence from twenty countries" 16 (16): 115-128, 2005

      33 Dubois, B., "Consumer Rapport to Luxury: Analyzing Complex and Ambivalent Attitudes" HEC School of Management 2001

      34 Aaker, D. A., "Brands" The Free Press 1996

      35 Hofstede, G., "Behaviors. Institutions and Organizations Across Nations" Sage Publications 2001

      36 Austin, J. R., "A re-examination of the generalizability of the Aaker brand personality measurement framework" 11 (11): 77-92, 2003

      37 Heine, K., "A Theory-based and Consumer-oriented Concept of Luxury Brands" 2010

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2016-09-01 평가 SCOPUS 등재 (기타) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2011-09-28 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Academy Of Marketing Science -> Korean Scholars of Marketing Science
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.63 0.63 0.64
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.6 0.62 1.341 0.1
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼