By reanalyzing the typical errors of the ``ba`` Construction of Korean students in HSK Dynamic Composition Corpus, it categorizes two types of error-generating mechanism: 1) Object marker, 2) the Causative structures. These errors were d erived from s...
By reanalyzing the typical errors of the ``ba`` Construction of Korean students in HSK Dynamic Composition Corpus, it categorizes two types of error-generating mechanism: 1) Object marker, 2) the Causative structures. These errors were d erived from strong interference and negative transfer of mother tongue. This pa per also claims that it is possible to use the four types of errors(1. Post-posing of Negative and Auxiliary verbs, 2. Using the indefinite ``ba`` Construction, 3. Verb er rors, 4. Causative errors) and the analysis of the special ``ba`` Construction in thi s essay to predict the other contemporary Chinese dialects which have closely con tacted with the Altaic languages and the historical Altaic Chinese documents. From this analysis, we can find that Korean students have no avoidance about ``ba`` Construction, absolutely misusing it in Second Language Acquisition, and this inter-language phenomena no reaching target language were caused by over generalization of ``ba`` Construction.