RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      제국청산 과정으로서의 한일교섭 = 샌프란시스코 강화조약과의 관련성을 중심으로

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99553345

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The core issue debated during the first round of negotiations to normalize diplomatic relations between Japan and Korea(ROK: Republic of Korea) was how to interpret the basic concept of reparations stipulated in San Francisco Peace Treaty to settle th...

      The core issue debated during the first round of negotiations to normalize diplomatic relations between Japan and Korea(ROK: Republic of Korea) was how to interpret the basic concept of reparations stipulated in San Francisco Peace Treaty to settle the bilateral problem of claims and properties. The Peace Treaty not only proclaimed the independence of Korea but also provided the principle in Article 4 for disposing properties overseas and claims related to the independence.
      This clause for relations between Japan and Korea as its former colony was juxtaposed with Article 14, which defined the principle for reparations between Japan and the Allied Powers. This provision proposed that the Allied Powers were to relinquish reparation claims in exchange of the confiscation of Japanese external assets in their territories. Furthermore, Article 15 allowed the Allied Powers to recover their properties in Japan proper.
      Korea turned to these clauses, claiming its right to recover its properties in Japan and to confiscate Japanese external assets in Korea as the Allied Powers did. This claim critically hinged on the question of whether ROK was regarded as part of the Allied Powers.
      The Japanese government strongly objected according ROK with the same legal status as the Allied Powers. ROK, however, considered itself as part of the victorious Allied Powers. This self-recognition led Seoul not to seek war-related claims just as the United States did not do so for fear that a harsh punishment would drive Japan for revenge like Germany after WW I.
      The above arguments coalesced into the dual legal question: whether Korea was a liberated nation, and whether its status defined in Article 4 was superior to Article 14 concerning the Allied Powers. The Korean government regarded itself first and foremost as one of the Allied Powers. It was why it strongly demanded its right to go to San Francisco and sign the Peace Treaty with Japan. In short, the key question for the Japan-ROK normalization talks was whether Korea’s status as a liberated former colony should be regarded superior to that of an independent nation at war with Japan. This historical question of Korea’s status took the form of a legal debate as to whether the effect of Article 4 (b) was stronger than Article 14 (b).
      At the heart of the Japan-ROK normalization talks, in short, was the historical character of Japan’s colonization of Korea, the question debated through the legal interpretation of the San Francisco Peace Treaty. Only through the parallel analysis of the legal and political dimensions can we understand the historical origin of the subsequent conflicts between the two nations that continue even today. And only through this analysis can we set ourselves free from national sentiments and find a common solution.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 들어가며
      • Ⅱ. 한일교섭의 초기 조건으로서의 샌프란시스코 강화조약
      • Ⅱ. 국민 감정과 법적 논리의 대립의 틈새-역사 인식 문제의 기원
      • Ⅲ. 나오며
      • 참고문헌
      • Ⅰ. 들어가며
      • Ⅱ. 한일교섭의 초기 조건으로서의 샌프란시스코 강화조약
      • Ⅱ. 국민 감정과 법적 논리의 대립의 틈새-역사 인식 문제의 기원
      • Ⅲ. 나오며
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼