RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    The Emergence of a Novelistic Culture - Modernity and the Perverse Topography of Narrative Desire

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76490857

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In this essay, I attempt to connect the Luk?csian problematic of the God-forsakenness of a world to the breakdown of the premodern regime of patriarchalism in the passage to modernity, and proceed to explore the implications of the demise of patriarchalism for the modern subject by transposing the notion of God-forsakenness to the Lacanian schema of the foreclosure of the Name-of-the-Father. I argue that just as the absence of the symbolic paternity as the signifier of the Other in speech triggers off the psychotic process, the abolishment of patriarchalism in modernity ushers in an analogous process of disalignment and reshaping of signifier, whose end-result is the fundamental alteration in the topography of the subject.<BR>  I turn next to Freud"s theory of intrapsychical agencies, especially his account of defusion of instincts, and to Lacan"s topographical expositions of psychosis, in order to interrogate the implications of the altered structure of the subject for the transition to the modern symbolic. Based on my reading of Freud and Lacan, I develop the hypothesis of generalized perversion in modernity, in which the exorbitant gap between the imaginary ego and the symbolic ego-ideal sets off the two-fold process of desexualization and resexualization, which, I argue, is at the basis of modernity"s narrative desire.<BR>  From this, I proceed to advance a theory of modern narrative form as what founds and underwrites the new representational regime of sexual difference. I show how the antagonistic dialectic between the imaginary ego and the symbolic superego characterizes the modern split subject which replaces the premodern subject safeguarded by paternal authority, and how the modern subject operates by projecting the surfeit of differential flows induced by the paranoid dialectic onto Others-both domestic and colonial-thereby transforming the latter into the phantasmatic objects of desire.
    번역하기

      In this essay, I attempt to connect the Luk?csian problematic of the God-forsakenness of a world to the breakdown of the premodern regime of patriarchalism in the passage to modernity, and proceed to explore the implications of the demis...

      In this essay, I attempt to connect the Luk?csian problematic of the God-forsakenness of a world to the breakdown of the premodern regime of patriarchalism in the passage to modernity, and proceed to explore the implications of the demise of patriarchalism for the modern subject by transposing the notion of God-forsakenness to the Lacanian schema of the foreclosure of the Name-of-the-Father. I argue that just as the absence of the symbolic paternity as the signifier of the Other in speech triggers off the psychotic process, the abolishment of patriarchalism in modernity ushers in an analogous process of disalignment and reshaping of signifier, whose end-result is the fundamental alteration in the topography of the subject.<BR>  I turn next to Freud"s theory of intrapsychical agencies, especially his account of defusion of instincts, and to Lacan"s topographical expositions of psychosis, in order to interrogate the implications of the altered structure of the subject for the transition to the modern symbolic. Based on my reading of Freud and Lacan, I develop the hypothesis of generalized perversion in modernity, in which the exorbitant gap between the imaginary ego and the symbolic ego-ideal sets off the two-fold process of desexualization and resexualization, which, I argue, is at the basis of modernity"s narrative desire.<BR>  From this, I proceed to advance a theory of modern narrative form as what founds and underwrites the new representational regime of sexual difference. I show how the antagonistic dialectic between the imaginary ego and the symbolic superego characterizes the modern split subject which replaces the premodern subject safeguarded by paternal authority, and how the modern subject operates by projecting the surfeit of differential flows induced by the paranoid dialectic onto Others-both domestic and colonial-thereby transforming the latter into the phantasmatic objects of desire.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼