RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      「줄리어스 시저」에 나타난 정신에 대해서

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60301149

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This essay explores the ways in which Shakespeare dramatizes the question of spirit in Julius Caesar. By closely reading the scenes in which the word spirit appears, it aims to explicate the fundamental nature of spirit. To be more specific, I argue that spirit is power. Caesar is a case in point. Despite physical limitedness and frailties, he lives in such a way as to overcome and transcend them. He even faces death as if he aspires to live forever as a spirit in the minds of Romans. His life, in a sense, can be read as a kind of process toward the birth of spiritual power and spirit as power. However, what is interesting about the nature of spirit is that anyone who possesses as powerful spirit as Caesar may become the source of power as well, thereby creating a new spirit. This is why revolt is structurally possible; spirit brings about anti-spirit. Brutus’s rebellion against Caesar can be understood in this line of thought. Brutus, as well as Cassius, strives to replace the spirit of Caesar that they defined as tyranny with a new spirit based upon peace, freedom, and liberty. They believe that they would herald a new spirit. Yet their ambition faces an unexpected barrier, as Antony redefines the spirit of Caesar as an emblem of sacrifice and successfully instigates plebeians to riot. Antony revives the spirit of Caesar by bringing the plebeians together, demonstrating that the collective power of people animates spirit. As a result, the conflict between the spirit of Caesar and anti-Caesar spirit escalates to the level of war. Shakespeare, in other words, seems to show that the nature of spirit is fundamentally warfare, as best shown in the employment of fire in the play. By associating spirit with a fire, which both literally and symbolically represents warfare. he is seen to confirm that the power of spirit, or spirit as power, is warfare of fire, which simultaneously inflames itself and others although Romans like us fight for ethical assumptions and values.
      번역하기

      This essay explores the ways in which Shakespeare dramatizes the question of spirit in Julius Caesar. By closely reading the scenes in which the word spirit appears, it aims to explicate the fundamental nature of spirit. To be more specific, I argue t...

      This essay explores the ways in which Shakespeare dramatizes the question of spirit in Julius Caesar. By closely reading the scenes in which the word spirit appears, it aims to explicate the fundamental nature of spirit. To be more specific, I argue that spirit is power. Caesar is a case in point. Despite physical limitedness and frailties, he lives in such a way as to overcome and transcend them. He even faces death as if he aspires to live forever as a spirit in the minds of Romans. His life, in a sense, can be read as a kind of process toward the birth of spiritual power and spirit as power. However, what is interesting about the nature of spirit is that anyone who possesses as powerful spirit as Caesar may become the source of power as well, thereby creating a new spirit. This is why revolt is structurally possible; spirit brings about anti-spirit. Brutus’s rebellion against Caesar can be understood in this line of thought. Brutus, as well as Cassius, strives to replace the spirit of Caesar that they defined as tyranny with a new spirit based upon peace, freedom, and liberty. They believe that they would herald a new spirit. Yet their ambition faces an unexpected barrier, as Antony redefines the spirit of Caesar as an emblem of sacrifice and successfully instigates plebeians to riot. Antony revives the spirit of Caesar by bringing the plebeians together, demonstrating that the collective power of people animates spirit. As a result, the conflict between the spirit of Caesar and anti-Caesar spirit escalates to the level of war. Shakespeare, in other words, seems to show that the nature of spirit is fundamentally warfare, as best shown in the employment of fire in the play. By associating spirit with a fire, which both literally and symbolically represents warfare. he is seen to confirm that the power of spirit, or spirit as power, is warfare of fire, which simultaneously inflames itself and others although Romans like us fight for ethical assumptions and values.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 게오르크 빌헬름 프리드리히 헤겔, "정신현상학" 한길사 2005

      2 박효춘, "『줄리어스 시저』의 이상주의와 현실주의 정치 대립을 통해 본 평민들의 꿈" 한국셰익스피어학회 47 (47): 273-312, 2011

      3 이행수, "『줄리어스 시저』의 거울구조" 한국셰익스피어학회 42 (42): 461-480, 2006

      4 김종환, "『줄리어스 시저』에 나타난 설득과 선동의 언어" 한국셰익스피어학회 47 (47): 563-584, 2011

      5 Mack, Maynard, "The Modernity of Julius Caesar, In Shakespeare’s Early Tragedies: a Collection of Critical Essays" Prentice Hall 199-210, 1995

      6 Knight, G. Wilson, "The Eroticism of Julius Caesar, In Bloom’s Shakespeare Through the Ages: Julius Caesar" Checkmark Books 119-145, 2008

      7 Bloom,Harold, "Shakespeare:the Invention of the Human" Riverhead Books 1998

      8 Ferguson, Francis, "Shakespeare Presents All Characters Sympathetically Tyranny in William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar" Gale 104-110, 2011

      9 Derrida, Jacques, "Of Spirit: Heidegger and the Question" U of Chicago P 1989

      10 Shakespeare, William, "Julius Caesar, In The Complete Works of Shakespeare" Longman 1021-1059, 1997

      1 게오르크 빌헬름 프리드리히 헤겔, "정신현상학" 한길사 2005

      2 박효춘, "『줄리어스 시저』의 이상주의와 현실주의 정치 대립을 통해 본 평민들의 꿈" 한국셰익스피어학회 47 (47): 273-312, 2011

      3 이행수, "『줄리어스 시저』의 거울구조" 한국셰익스피어학회 42 (42): 461-480, 2006

      4 김종환, "『줄리어스 시저』에 나타난 설득과 선동의 언어" 한국셰익스피어학회 47 (47): 563-584, 2011

      5 Mack, Maynard, "The Modernity of Julius Caesar, In Shakespeare’s Early Tragedies: a Collection of Critical Essays" Prentice Hall 199-210, 1995

      6 Knight, G. Wilson, "The Eroticism of Julius Caesar, In Bloom’s Shakespeare Through the Ages: Julius Caesar" Checkmark Books 119-145, 2008

      7 Bloom,Harold, "Shakespeare:the Invention of the Human" Riverhead Books 1998

      8 Ferguson, Francis, "Shakespeare Presents All Characters Sympathetically Tyranny in William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar" Gale 104-110, 2011

      9 Derrida, Jacques, "Of Spirit: Heidegger and the Question" U of Chicago P 1989

      10 Shakespeare, William, "Julius Caesar, In The Complete Works of Shakespeare" Longman 1021-1059, 1997

      11 Dorsch, T. S, "Introduction: Language and Imagery, In Bloom’s Shakespeare Through the Ages: Julius Caesar" Checkmark Books 212-219, 2008

      12 Heidegger, Martin, "Introduction to Metaphysics" Yale UP 2000

      13 Rose, Mark, "Conjuring Caesar: Ceremony, History, and Authority in 1599, In Shakespeare’s Early Tragedies: a Collection of Critical Essays" Prentice Hall 230-240, 1995

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.12 0.12 0.14
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.12 0.11 0.561 0.03
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼