This study examined whether computerized dynamic testing by utilizing a robot would lead to different patterns in children's (aged 6–9 years) potential for learning and strategy use when solving series‐completion tasks. The robot, in a “Wizard ...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=O119362968
2019년
-
0266-4909
1365-2729
SSCI;SCOPUS
학술저널
540-554 [※수록면이 p5 이하이면, Review, Columns, Editor's Note, Abstract 등일 경우가 있습니다.]
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This study examined whether computerized dynamic testing by utilizing a robot would lead to different patterns in children's (aged 6–9 years) potential for learning and strategy use when solving series‐completion tasks. The robot, in a “Wizard ...
This study examined whether computerized dynamic testing by utilizing a robot would lead to different patterns in children's (aged 6–9 years) potential for learning and strategy use when solving series‐completion tasks. The robot, in a “Wizard of Oz” setting, provided instructions and prompts during dynamic testing. It was found that a dynamic training resulted in greater accuracy and more correctly placed pieces at the post‐test than repeated testing only. Moreover, children who were dynamically trained appeared to use more heuristic strategies at the post‐test than their peers who were not trained. In general, observations showed that children were excited to work with the robot. All in all, the study revealed that computerized dynamic testing by means of a robot has much potential in tapping into children's potential for learning and strategy use. The implications of using a robot in educational assessment were stressed further in the discussion.
What is already known about this topic:
○
Computerized dynamic testing provides information on children's potential for learning.
○
Computerized testing can be of help in the fine‐tuning of assessment outcomes.
What this paper adds:
○
Dynamic testing with a peer/table robot provides information on children's potential for learning.
○
Dynamic testing and training by a peer robot results in greater accuracy in solving an inductive reasoning task than repeated testing only.
○
Dynamically trained children show a more advanced use of analytic task solving than their peers who were not trained by a peer robot.
○
Dynamic testing with a peer/table robot provides detailed, step‐by‐step information regarding children's need for instruction during assessment.
○
Children were very eager to work with the peer/table robot.
Computerized dynamic testing provides information on children's potential for learning.
Computerized testing can be of help in the fine‐tuning of assessment outcomes.
Dynamic testing with a peer/table robot provides information on children's potential for learning.
Dynamic testing and training by a peer robot results in greater accuracy in solving an inductive reasoning task than repeated testing only.
Dynamically trained children show a more advanced use of analytic task solving than their peers who were not trained by a peer robot.
Dynamic testing with a peer/table robot provides detailed, step‐by‐step information regarding children's need for instruction during assessment.
Children were very eager to work with the peer/table robot.
Implications for practice and/or policy:
○
Detailed assessment information derived from dynamic testing may be more suitable to inform education.
○
Computerized testing with a peer/table provides a motivating testing environment for children who can work independently, in their own tempo, on a task.
○
In future, a peer/table robot may be of help in teaching/assessment situations in education.
Detailed assessment information derived from dynamic testing may be more suitable to inform education.
Computerized testing with a peer/table provides a motivating testing environment for children who can work independently, in their own tempo, on a task.
In future, a peer/table robot may be of help in teaching/assessment situations in education.
Reflective assessment for epistemic agency of academically low‐achieving students