RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      [일반논문] 안중근의 동양평화론과 그 성격

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75962068

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In his theory of Oriental Peace, Ahn Jung Keun agreed in principle "the Theory of Solidarity among the Three East Asian Countries (i.e., Korea, China, and Japan)". This article is to give an explanation of why Ahn supported the Theory of Solidarity. W...

      In his theory of Oriental Peace, Ahn Jung Keun agreed in principle "the Theory of Solidarity among the Three East Asian Countries (i.e., Korea, China, and Japan)". This article is to give an explanation of why Ahn supported the Theory of Solidarity. With the rationale in Ahn's theory of Oriental Peace that the independence of Korea was a matter of the highest priority, I argue that his support of the Theory of Solidarity was primarily aimed at preventing Russia from advancing southwards. At the same time, I claim that since his theory of Oriental Peace was based on his belief in the capability of the people to make world peace attainable, the range of a collective peace system he proposed could stretch over the whole world.<br/>
      First, examining Ahn's proposal of a permanent peace conference among the three countries, I expatiate on two pretexts for the need for establishing the peace conference. On the one hand, he thought that it would be useful to guard Korea against the aggression of European powers. On the other hand, he wished to make use of it to prevent a quarrel among the three countries. At this juncture, his theory of Oriental Peace appears to be merely parochial.<br/>
      Second, I demonstrate the way in which Ahn's view of the people affected his theory of Oriental Peace. For Ahn, the people were not only inseparable from peace process but also important in achieving Eastern as well as world peace. Ahn hold racism in the first place.<br/>
      However, he perceived that the people all throughout the world were peaceful, whereby' he finally overcome racism.<br/>
      Third, I analyze his view of the West in the theory of Oriental Peace. There are two interwoven policies with respect to the West. In the case that European powers intended to persist in their aggressive policies, Ahn sought to establish a military alliance among the three countries. However, he considered European powers as partners for peace and cooperation to the extent to which he trusted in the actual roles of international laws, international organizations, and inter¬national conferences. Substantially, Ahn's theory of Oriental Peace could be extended to the world if European powers assumed the peaceful.<br/>
      Ahn's theory of Oriental Peace primarily aimed at establishing a peace system among the three countries. Nevertheless, the peace system Ahn proposed in his theory of Oriental Peace was expandable to the Southeastern Asia next and Europe eventually. This analysis challenges arguments that Ahn's theory of Oriental Peace is parochial.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 머리말
      • 2. 안중근의 역사인식
      • 3. 안중근의 동양평화론
      • 4. 맺음말
      • 참고문헌
      • 1. 머리말
      • 2. 안중근의 역사인식
      • 3. 안중근의 동양평화론
      • 4. 맺음말
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2020-04-22 학회명변경 한글명 : 아세아문제연구소 -> 아세아문제연구원
      영문명 : Asiatic Research Center -> Asiatic Research Institute
      KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-10-10 학술지명변경 한글명 : 亞細亞 硏究 -> 아세아연구
      외국어명 : 미등록 -> The Journal of Asiatic Studies
      KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.76 0.76 0.64
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.54 0.56 1.013 0.16
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼