RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      유럽과 우리나라의 의무공개매수제도 상 공동행사 개념: 기업의 지속가능성 제고 방안을 중심으로 = The Concepts of ‘Acting in Concert’ in Mandatory Bid Rules of Europe and South Korea: Focused on a Way Enhancing Corporate Sustainability

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109306488

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This article aims to suppress the adverse effect of the Mandatory Bid Rule (“MBR”) while keeping its virtuous function working. The former means the MBR may restrain the shareholders’ collective action seeking to establish sustainable corporate governance, and the latter means the MBR’s original object, which protects remaining shareholders from the pressure to tender even when control over a corporation is changed by shareholder activism. Overseas, shareholders’ collective actions pursuing ESG did not satisfy in just expressing opinions regarding their desire, rather, actually replaced board members of the corporation they invested in early on. From the beginning of shareholder activism, countries that introduced the MBR recognized its critical downside, which likely obligates shareholders to make a mandatory offer even when they try to improve the governance of the company they invested in. This problem originated from the fact that their engagement in the corporation has room to meet the meaning of ‘acting in concert’ under the takeover regulations of each country. To protect shareholders’ collective action, European society has established a mechanism that exempts the actions from the MBR only when the purpose of the engagement is to improve corporate governance, not a board control-seeking. In other words, Europe subdivided the meaning of ‘acting in concert.’ On the other hand, though the concept of ‘acting in concert’ was defined too broadly as its purpose at the time of its first establishment under South Korea’s securities law, the original concept has reached today without any significant changes. Against this background, this article proposes a way to make the concept of ‘acting in concert’ sustainable like those in European countries.
      번역하기

      This article aims to suppress the adverse effect of the Mandatory Bid Rule (“MBR”) while keeping its virtuous function working. The former means the MBR may restrain the shareholders’ collective action seeking to establish sustainable corporate ...

      This article aims to suppress the adverse effect of the Mandatory Bid Rule (“MBR”) while keeping its virtuous function working. The former means the MBR may restrain the shareholders’ collective action seeking to establish sustainable corporate governance, and the latter means the MBR’s original object, which protects remaining shareholders from the pressure to tender even when control over a corporation is changed by shareholder activism. Overseas, shareholders’ collective actions pursuing ESG did not satisfy in just expressing opinions regarding their desire, rather, actually replaced board members of the corporation they invested in early on. From the beginning of shareholder activism, countries that introduced the MBR recognized its critical downside, which likely obligates shareholders to make a mandatory offer even when they try to improve the governance of the company they invested in. This problem originated from the fact that their engagement in the corporation has room to meet the meaning of ‘acting in concert’ under the takeover regulations of each country. To protect shareholders’ collective action, European society has established a mechanism that exempts the actions from the MBR only when the purpose of the engagement is to improve corporate governance, not a board control-seeking. In other words, Europe subdivided the meaning of ‘acting in concert.’ On the other hand, though the concept of ‘acting in concert’ was defined too broadly as its purpose at the time of its first establishment under South Korea’s securities law, the original concept has reached today without any significant changes. Against this background, this article proposes a way to make the concept of ‘acting in concert’ sustainable like those in European countries.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼